Exposure to Smoke From Wildfire, Prescribed, and Agricultural Burns Among At-Risk Populations Across Washington, Oregon, and California

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Geohealth Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1029/2023GH000961
C. L. Schollaert, M. E. Marlier, J. D. Marshall, J. T. Spector, T. Busch Isaksen
{"title":"Exposure to Smoke From Wildfire, Prescribed, and Agricultural Burns Among At-Risk Populations Across Washington, Oregon, and California","authors":"C. L. Schollaert,&nbsp;M. E. Marlier,&nbsp;J. D. Marshall,&nbsp;J. T. Spector,&nbsp;T. Busch Isaksen","doi":"10.1029/2023GH000961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wildfires, prescribed burns, and agricultural burns all impact ambient air quality across the Western U.S.; however, little is known about how communities across the region are differentially exposed to smoke from each of these fire types. To address this gap, we quantify smoke exposure stemming from wildfire, prescribed, and agricultural burns across Washington, Oregon, and California from 2014 to 2020 using a fire type-specific biomass burning emissions inventory and the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model. We examine fire type-specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and in relation to the Center for Disease Control's Social Vulnerability Index. Overall, population-weighted PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations are greater from wildfires than from prescribed and from agricultural burns. While we found limited evidence of exposure disparities among sub-groups across the full study area, we did observe disproportionately higher exposures to wildfire-specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposures among Native communities in all three states and, in California, higher agricultural burn-specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposures among lower socioeconomic groups. We also identified, for all three states, areas of significant spatial clustering of smoke exposures from all fire types and increased social vulnerability. These results provide a first look at the differential contributions of smoke from wildfires, prescribed burns, and agricultural burns to PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposures among demographic subgroups, which can be used to inform more tailored exposure reduction strategies across sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":48618,"journal":{"name":"Geohealth","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023GH000961","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GH000961","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wildfires, prescribed burns, and agricultural burns all impact ambient air quality across the Western U.S.; however, little is known about how communities across the region are differentially exposed to smoke from each of these fire types. To address this gap, we quantify smoke exposure stemming from wildfire, prescribed, and agricultural burns across Washington, Oregon, and California from 2014 to 2020 using a fire type-specific biomass burning emissions inventory and the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model. We examine fire type-specific PM2.5 concentration by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and in relation to the Center for Disease Control's Social Vulnerability Index. Overall, population-weighted PM2.5 concentrations are greater from wildfires than from prescribed and from agricultural burns. While we found limited evidence of exposure disparities among sub-groups across the full study area, we did observe disproportionately higher exposures to wildfire-specific PM2.5 exposures among Native communities in all three states and, in California, higher agricultural burn-specific PM2.5 exposures among lower socioeconomic groups. We also identified, for all three states, areas of significant spatial clustering of smoke exposures from all fire types and increased social vulnerability. These results provide a first look at the differential contributions of smoke from wildfires, prescribed burns, and agricultural burns to PM2.5 exposures among demographic subgroups, which can be used to inform more tailored exposure reduction strategies across sources.

Abstract Image

华盛顿州、俄勒冈州和加利福尼亚州高危人群暴露于野火、规定烧毁和农业烧毁烟雾的情况
野火、规定的燃烧和农业焚烧都会影响美国西部的环境空气质量;然而,人们对整个地区的社区如何不同程度地暴露于这些火灾类型产生的烟雾却知之甚少。为了填补这一空白,我们使用特定火灾类型的生物质燃烧排放清单和 GEOS-Chem 化学传输模型,量化了 2014 年至 2020 年华盛顿州、俄勒冈州和加利福尼亚州的野火、规定烧荒和农业烧荒产生的烟雾暴露。我们按种族/人种、社会经济状况以及疾病控制中心的社会脆弱性指数对特定火灾类型的 PM2.5 浓度进行了研究。总体而言,野火产生的人口加权 PM2.5 浓度要高于处方焚烧和农业焚烧产生的 PM2.5 浓度。虽然我们在整个研究区域内发现的亚群体间暴露差异的证据有限,但我们确实观察到在所有三个州的原住民社区中,野火特有的 PM2.5 暴露过高,而在加利福尼亚州,社会经济地位较低的群体中,农业焚烧特有的 PM2.5 暴露较高。我们还发现,在所有三个州中,所有火灾类型造成的烟雾暴露都有明显的空间聚集区域,社会脆弱性也有所增加。这些结果首次揭示了野火、规定焚烧和农业焚烧产生的烟雾在不同人口亚群中对 PM2.5 暴露的不同贡献,这些结果可用于制定更有针对性的减少各种来源暴露的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geohealth
Geohealth Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: GeoHealth will publish original research, reviews, policy discussions, and commentaries that cover the growing science on the interface among the Earth, atmospheric, oceans and environmental sciences, ecology, and the agricultural and health sciences. The journal will cover a wide variety of global and local issues including the impacts of climate change on human, agricultural, and ecosystem health, air and water pollution, environmental persistence of herbicides and pesticides, radiation and health, geomedicine, and the health effects of disasters. Many of these topics and others are of critical importance in the developing world and all require bringing together leading research across multiple disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信