Ultrasound-assisted isolation: A new method to isolate stromal vascular fraction

Yiming Gao , Xiaojie Zhang , Poh-Ching Tan , Yun Xie , Peiqi Zhang , Tianyu Zhang , Qingfeng Li , Shuangbai Zhou
{"title":"Ultrasound-assisted isolation: A new method to isolate stromal vascular fraction","authors":"Yiming Gao ,&nbsp;Xiaojie Zhang ,&nbsp;Poh-Ching Tan ,&nbsp;Yun Xie ,&nbsp;Peiqi Zhang ,&nbsp;Tianyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Qingfeng Li ,&nbsp;Shuangbai Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.cjprs.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The stromal vascular fraction (SVF), a cluster of stem and progenitor cells isolated from adipose tissue, holds significant promise for application in regenerative medicine. However, the existing methods for SVF isolation are time-consuming and expensive. Thus, in this study, we explored a new method of SVF extraction—ultrasound-assisted SVF isolation (USASI)—and compared the viability and characteristics of SVF isolated using different methods.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>SVF extraction methods using different combinations of ultrasound power, ultrasound time, collagenase dosage, and collagenase digestion time were compared with those of the control group (collagenase digestion method). The cell yield and vitality of the SVF were evaluated via cell counting and trypan blue staining. The cell components and immunophenotypes of freshly isolated SVF were analyzed using flow cytometry. The proliferative capacity and differentiation potential of the SVF were also identified.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ultrasonication at 95 ​W-20 kHz for 30 ​s followed by digestion with 0.15% collagenase for 30 ​min was identified as the most suitable parameter for the USASI method in isolating SVF, as recommended based on the evaluation of various tested conditions. The USASI method significantly reduced the collagenase dosage and shortened the digestion time. Compared to the collagenase digestion method, the USASI method had a higher cell yield and cell viability, with no adverse effects on cell components, proliferative capacity, or multipotential differentiation capacity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>With reduced processing time, lower collagenase dosage, and increased cell yield without impairing the viability and characteristics of SVF, USASI holds the potential to emerge as a time-saving and cost-effective method for future clinical applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":65600,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 8-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096691124000153/pdfft?md5=e2be2911229d92e3aa6f7c19085c366f&pid=1-s2.0-S2096691124000153-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096691124000153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The stromal vascular fraction (SVF), a cluster of stem and progenitor cells isolated from adipose tissue, holds significant promise for application in regenerative medicine. However, the existing methods for SVF isolation are time-consuming and expensive. Thus, in this study, we explored a new method of SVF extraction—ultrasound-assisted SVF isolation (USASI)—and compared the viability and characteristics of SVF isolated using different methods.

Methods

SVF extraction methods using different combinations of ultrasound power, ultrasound time, collagenase dosage, and collagenase digestion time were compared with those of the control group (collagenase digestion method). The cell yield and vitality of the SVF were evaluated via cell counting and trypan blue staining. The cell components and immunophenotypes of freshly isolated SVF were analyzed using flow cytometry. The proliferative capacity and differentiation potential of the SVF were also identified.

Results

Ultrasonication at 95 ​W-20 kHz for 30 ​s followed by digestion with 0.15% collagenase for 30 ​min was identified as the most suitable parameter for the USASI method in isolating SVF, as recommended based on the evaluation of various tested conditions. The USASI method significantly reduced the collagenase dosage and shortened the digestion time. Compared to the collagenase digestion method, the USASI method had a higher cell yield and cell viability, with no adverse effects on cell components, proliferative capacity, or multipotential differentiation capacity.

Conclusion

With reduced processing time, lower collagenase dosage, and increased cell yield without impairing the viability and characteristics of SVF, USASI holds the potential to emerge as a time-saving and cost-effective method for future clinical applications.

超声辅助分离:分离基质血管部分的新方法
背景基质血管成分(SVF)是从脂肪组织中分离出来的干细胞和祖细胞群,它在再生医学中的应用前景十分广阔。然而,现有的 SVF 分离方法既费时又昂贵。因此,在本研究中,我们探索了一种新的 SVF 提取方法--超声辅助 SVF 分离(USASI),并比较了用不同方法分离的 SVF 的活力和特征。方法将不同超声功率、超声时间、胶原酶剂量和胶原酶消化时间组合的 SVF 提取方法与对照组(胶原酶消化法)的 SVF 提取方法进行了比较。通过细胞计数和胰蓝染色评估了 SVF 的细胞产量和活力。流式细胞术分析了新鲜分离 SVF 的细胞成分和免疫分型。结果根据对各种测试条件的评估,确定 95 W-20 kHz 超声波 30 秒,然后用 0.15% 胶原酶消化 30 分钟是 USASI 法分离 SVF 的最合适参数。USASI 法大大减少了胶原酶的用量,缩短了消化时间。与胶原酶消化法相比,USASI 法具有更高的细胞产量和细胞活力,对细胞成分、增殖能力和多潜能分化能力没有不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Pathology and Medical Technology, Transplantation
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信