Concomitant use of Pre-emptive analgesia with Local and General Anesthesia in Rat Uterine Surgical Pain Model

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Saima Mumtaz, Najma Baseer, Syed Hamid Habib
{"title":"Concomitant use of Pre-emptive analgesia with Local and General Anesthesia in Rat Uterine Surgical Pain Model","authors":"Saima Mumtaz, Najma Baseer, Syed Hamid Habib","doi":"10.1177/17448069241252385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preemptive analgesia is used for postoperative pain management, providing pain relief with few adverse effects. In this study, the effect of a preemptive regime on rat behavior and c-fos expression in the spinal cord of the uterine surgical pain model was evaluated.
 Method: It was a lab-based experimental study in which sixty female Sprague-Dawley rats; eight to ten weeks old, weighing 150–300 gm were used. The rats were divided into three main groups: i) Control group (CG), ii) superficial pain group (SG) (with skin incision only), iii) deep pain group (with skin and uterine incisions). Each group was further divided into three subgroups based on the type of preemptive analgesia administered i.e., “tramadol, buprenorphine, and saline subgroups.” Pain behavior was evaluated using the “Rat Grimace Scale” (RGS) at 2, 4, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-surgery. Additionally, c-fos immunohistochemistry was performed on sections from the spinal dorsal horn (T12-L2), and its expression was evaluated using optical density and mean cell count two hours postoperatively. 
 Results: Significant reduction in the RGS was noted in both the superficial and deep pain groups within the tramadol and buprenorphine subgroups when compared to the saline subgroup (p≤0.05). There was a significant decrease in c-fos expression both in terms of number of c-fos positive cells and the optical density across the superficial laminae and lamina X of the spinal dorsal horn in both SD and DG (p≤0.05). In contrast, the saline group exhibited c-fos expression primarily in laminae I-II and III-IV for both superficial and deep pain groups and lamina X in the deep pain group only (p≤0.05).
 Conclusion: A preemptive regimen results in significant suppression of both superficial and deep components of pain transmission. These findings provide compelling evidence of the analgesic efficacy of preemptive treatment in alleviating pain response associated with uterine surgery.","PeriodicalId":19010,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17448069241252385","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preemptive analgesia is used for postoperative pain management, providing pain relief with few adverse effects. In this study, the effect of a preemptive regime on rat behavior and c-fos expression in the spinal cord of the uterine surgical pain model was evaluated. Method: It was a lab-based experimental study in which sixty female Sprague-Dawley rats; eight to ten weeks old, weighing 150–300 gm were used. The rats were divided into three main groups: i) Control group (CG), ii) superficial pain group (SG) (with skin incision only), iii) deep pain group (with skin and uterine incisions). Each group was further divided into three subgroups based on the type of preemptive analgesia administered i.e., “tramadol, buprenorphine, and saline subgroups.” Pain behavior was evaluated using the “Rat Grimace Scale” (RGS) at 2, 4, 6, 9 and 24 hours post-surgery. Additionally, c-fos immunohistochemistry was performed on sections from the spinal dorsal horn (T12-L2), and its expression was evaluated using optical density and mean cell count two hours postoperatively. Results: Significant reduction in the RGS was noted in both the superficial and deep pain groups within the tramadol and buprenorphine subgroups when compared to the saline subgroup (p≤0.05). There was a significant decrease in c-fos expression both in terms of number of c-fos positive cells and the optical density across the superficial laminae and lamina X of the spinal dorsal horn in both SD and DG (p≤0.05). In contrast, the saline group exhibited c-fos expression primarily in laminae I-II and III-IV for both superficial and deep pain groups and lamina X in the deep pain group only (p≤0.05). Conclusion: A preemptive regimen results in significant suppression of both superficial and deep components of pain transmission. These findings provide compelling evidence of the analgesic efficacy of preemptive treatment in alleviating pain response associated with uterine surgery.
在大鼠子宫手术疼痛模型中同时使用局部和全身麻醉的预先镇痛法
抢先镇痛用于术后疼痛治疗,可缓解疼痛,且不良反应少。本研究评估了抢先镇痛对子宫手术疼痛模型大鼠行为和脊髓中 c-fos 表达的影响:这是一项以实验室为基础的实验研究,使用了 60 只雌性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠;8 至 10 周大,体重 150 至 300 克。大鼠分为三大组:i) 对照组(CG);ii) 浅痛组(SG)(仅皮肤切口);iii) 深痛组(皮肤和子宫切口)。根据预先镇痛的类型,每组又分为三个亚组,即 "曲马多亚组、丁丙诺啡亚组和生理盐水亚组"。在手术后 2、4、6、9 和 24 小时,使用 "大鼠痛苦量表"(RGS)对疼痛行为进行评估。此外,还对脊髓背角(T12-L2)切片进行了 c-fos 免疫组化,并在术后两小时用光密度和平均细胞数评估其表达:与生理盐水亚组相比,曲马多和丁丙诺啡亚组中浅痛和深痛组的 RGS 均显著减少(p≤0.05)。在 SD 组和 DG 组中,c-fos 阳性细胞的数量以及脊髓背角浅层和 X 层的光密度均明显减少(p≤0.05)。相比之下,生理盐水组的c-fos表达主要集中在浅层和深层疼痛组的I-II和III-IV层,深层疼痛组仅在X层(p≤0.05):抢先治疗可显著抑制疼痛传递的表层和深层成分。这些研究结果提供了令人信服的证据,证明抢先治疗在减轻子宫手术相关疼痛反应方面具有镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Pain
Molecular Pain 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Pain is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that considers manuscripts in pain research at the cellular, subcellular and molecular levels. Molecular Pain provides a forum for molecular pain scientists to communicate their research findings in a targeted manner to others in this important and growing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信