Single missing molar with wide mesiodistal length restored using a single or double implant-supported crown: A self-controlled case report and 3D finite element analysis

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Iohong Wong, Zhengchuan Zhang, Xiaobing Dang, Xiaoran Yu, Xiaoxuan Lin, Yiming Li, Feilong Deng, Ruogu Xu
{"title":"Single missing molar with wide mesiodistal length restored using a single or double implant-supported crown: A self-controlled case report and 3D finite element analysis","authors":"Iohong Wong, Zhengchuan Zhang, Xiaobing Dang, Xiaoran Yu, Xiaoxuan Lin, Yiming Li, Feilong Deng, Ruogu Xu","doi":"10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_23_00278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Based on a self-controlled case, this study evaluated the finite element analysis (FEA) results of a single missing molar with wide mesiodistal length (MDL) restored by a single or double implant-supported crown.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> A case of a missing bilateral mandibular first molar with wide MDL was restored using a single or double implant-supported crown. The implant survival and peri-implant bone were compared. FEA was conducted in coordination with the case using eight models with different MDLs (12, 13, 14, and 15 mm). Von Mises stress was calculated in the FEA to evaluate the biomechanical responses of the implants under increasing vertical and lateral loading, including the stress values of the implant, abutment, screw, crown, and cortical bone.</p><p><b>Results:</b> The restorations on the left and right sides supported by double implants have been used for 6 and 12 years, respectively, and so far have shown excellent osseointegration radiographically.</p><p>The von Mises stress calculated in the FEA showed that when the MDL was &gt;14 mm, both the bone and prosthetic components bore more stress in the single implant-supported strategy. The strength was 188.62–201.37 MPa and 201.85–215.9 MPa when the MDL was 14 mm and 15 mm, respectively, which significantly exceeded the allowable yield stress (180 MPa).</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Compared with the single implant-supported crown, the double implant-supported crown reduced peri-implant bone stress and produced a more appropriate stress transfer model at the implant-bone interface when the MDL of the single missing molar was ≥14 mm.</p>\n<p></p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_23_00278","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Based on a self-controlled case, this study evaluated the finite element analysis (FEA) results of a single missing molar with wide mesiodistal length (MDL) restored by a single or double implant-supported crown.

Methods: A case of a missing bilateral mandibular first molar with wide MDL was restored using a single or double implant-supported crown. The implant survival and peri-implant bone were compared. FEA was conducted in coordination with the case using eight models with different MDLs (12, 13, 14, and 15 mm). Von Mises stress was calculated in the FEA to evaluate the biomechanical responses of the implants under increasing vertical and lateral loading, including the stress values of the implant, abutment, screw, crown, and cortical bone.

Results: The restorations on the left and right sides supported by double implants have been used for 6 and 12 years, respectively, and so far have shown excellent osseointegration radiographically.

The von Mises stress calculated in the FEA showed that when the MDL was >14 mm, both the bone and prosthetic components bore more stress in the single implant-supported strategy. The strength was 188.62–201.37 MPa and 201.85–215.9 MPa when the MDL was 14 mm and 15 mm, respectively, which significantly exceeded the allowable yield stress (180 MPa).

Conclusions: Compared with the single implant-supported crown, the double implant-supported crown reduced peri-implant bone stress and produced a more appropriate stress transfer model at the implant-bone interface when the MDL of the single missing molar was ≥14 mm.

使用单种植体或双种植体支撑冠修复牙周中宽的单缺失臼齿:自控病例报告和 3D 有限元分析
目的:本研究基于一个自控病例,评估了单颗缺失臼齿的有限元分析(FEA)结果,该缺失臼齿的中髁间长度(MDL)较宽,采用单种植体支撑冠或双种植体支撑冠修复:对一例双侧下颌第一磨牙缺失且MDL较宽的病例采用单种植体支持冠或双种植体支持冠进行修复。比较了种植体的存活率和种植体周围的骨量。结合该病例,使用不同 MDL(12、13、14 和 15 毫米)的八个模型进行了有限元分析。在有限元分析中计算了 Von Mises 应力,以评估种植体在不断增加的垂直和横向负荷下的生物力学反应,包括种植体、基台、螺钉、牙冠和皮质骨的应力值:有限元分析计算出的 von Mises 应力显示,当 MDL 为 14 mm 时,单种植体支持策略下骨质和修复体承受的应力更大。当 MDL 为 14 mm 和 15 mm 时,强度分别为 188.62-201.37 MPa 和 201.85-215.9MPa,大大超过了允许屈服应力(180 MPa):与单种植体支持冠相比,当单颗缺失磨牙的MDL≥14 mm时,双种植体支持冠降低了种植体周围的骨应力,并在种植体-骨界面产生了更合适的应力传递模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信