Underlying Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive Improvement in Fronto-striatal Response Inhibition in People Living with HIV Switching Off Efavirenz: A Randomized Controlled BOLD fMRI Trial

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Patrick G. A. Oomen, Charlotte S. Hakkers, Joop E. Arends, Guido E. L. van der Berk, Pascal Pas, Andy I. M. Hoepelman, Berend J. van Welzen, Stefan du Plessis
{"title":"Underlying Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive Improvement in Fronto-striatal Response Inhibition in People Living with HIV Switching Off Efavirenz: A Randomized Controlled BOLD fMRI Trial","authors":"Patrick G. A. Oomen, Charlotte S. Hakkers, Joop E. Arends, Guido E. L. van der Berk, Pascal Pas, Andy I. M. Hoepelman, Berend J. van Welzen, Stefan du Plessis","doi":"10.1007/s40121-024-00966-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>It is unclear whether neurotoxicity due to the antiretroviral drug efavirenz (EFV) results in neurocognitive impairment in people living with HIV (PLWH). Previously, we found that discontinuing EFV was associated with improved processing speed and attention on neuropsychological assessment. In this imaging study, we investigate potential neural mechanisms underlying this cognitive improvement using a BOLD fMRI task assessing cortical and subcortical functioning.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Asymptomatic adult PLWH stable on emtricitabine/tenofovirdisoproxil/efavirenz were randomly (1:2) assigned to continue their regimen (<i>n</i> = 12) or to switch to emtricitabine/tenofovirdisoproxil/rilpivirine (<i>n</i> = 28). At baseline and after 12 weeks, both groups performed the Stop-Signal Anticipation Task, which tests reactive and proactive inhibition (indicative of subcortical and cortical functioning, respectively), involving executive functioning, working memory, and attention. Behavior and BOLD fMRI activation levels related to processing speed and attention Z-scores were assessed in 17 pre-defined brain regions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Both groups had comparable patient and clinical characteristics. Reactive inhibition behavioral responses improved for both groups on week 12, with other responses unchanged. Between-group activation did not differ significantly. For reactive inhibition, positive Pearson coefficients were observed for the change in BOLD fMRI activation levels and change in processing speed and attention Z-scores in all 17 regions in participants switched to emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil/rilpivirine, whereas in the control group, negative correlation coefficients were observed in 10/17 and 13/17 regions, respectively. No differential pattern was observed for proactive inhibition.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Potential neural mechanisms underlying cognitive improvement after discontinuing EFV in PLWH were found in subcortical functioning, with our findings suggesting that EFV’s effect on attention and processing speed is, at least partially, mediated by reactive inhibition.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Trial Registration</h3><p>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier [NCT02308332].</p>","PeriodicalId":13592,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-024-00966-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

It is unclear whether neurotoxicity due to the antiretroviral drug efavirenz (EFV) results in neurocognitive impairment in people living with HIV (PLWH). Previously, we found that discontinuing EFV was associated with improved processing speed and attention on neuropsychological assessment. In this imaging study, we investigate potential neural mechanisms underlying this cognitive improvement using a BOLD fMRI task assessing cortical and subcortical functioning.

Methods

Asymptomatic adult PLWH stable on emtricitabine/tenofovirdisoproxil/efavirenz were randomly (1:2) assigned to continue their regimen (n = 12) or to switch to emtricitabine/tenofovirdisoproxil/rilpivirine (n = 28). At baseline and after 12 weeks, both groups performed the Stop-Signal Anticipation Task, which tests reactive and proactive inhibition (indicative of subcortical and cortical functioning, respectively), involving executive functioning, working memory, and attention. Behavior and BOLD fMRI activation levels related to processing speed and attention Z-scores were assessed in 17 pre-defined brain regions.

Results

Both groups had comparable patient and clinical characteristics. Reactive inhibition behavioral responses improved for both groups on week 12, with other responses unchanged. Between-group activation did not differ significantly. For reactive inhibition, positive Pearson coefficients were observed for the change in BOLD fMRI activation levels and change in processing speed and attention Z-scores in all 17 regions in participants switched to emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil/rilpivirine, whereas in the control group, negative correlation coefficients were observed in 10/17 and 13/17 regions, respectively. No differential pattern was observed for proactive inhibition.

Conclusion

Potential neural mechanisms underlying cognitive improvement after discontinuing EFV in PLWH were found in subcortical functioning, with our findings suggesting that EFV’s effect on attention and processing speed is, at least partially, mediated by reactive inhibition.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier [NCT02308332].

Abstract Image

艾滋病病毒感染者停用依非韦伦后前纹状体反应抑制认知改善的潜在神经机制:随机对照 BOLD fMRI 试验
引言 目前尚不清楚抗逆转录病毒药物依非韦伦(EFV)的神经毒性是否会导致艾滋病病毒感染者(PLWH)出现神经认知障碍。此前,我们发现停用 EFV 与神经心理学评估中处理速度和注意力的改善有关。在这项成像研究中,我们使用评估皮层和皮层下功能的 BOLD fMRI 任务来研究这种认知改善的潜在神经机制。方法将稳定服用恩曲他滨/替诺福韦酯/依非韦伦的无症状成年艾滋病病毒感染者随机(1:2)分配到继续服用其治疗方案(n = 12)或改用恩曲他滨/替诺福韦酯/利匹韦林(n = 28)。在基线和12周后,两组患者都进行了停止信号预期任务,该任务测试反应性和主动性抑制(分别表明皮层下和皮层功能),涉及执行功能、工作记忆和注意力。在 17 个预先确定的脑区评估了与处理速度和注意力 Z 评分相关的行为和 BOLD fMRI 激活水平。第 12 周时,两组患者的反应性抑制行为反应均有所改善,其他反应保持不变。组间激活没有显著差异。在反应性抑制方面,改用恩曲他滨/替诺福韦二吡呋酯/利匹韦林治疗的患者在所有17个区域的BOLD fMRI激活水平变化与处理速度和注意力Z分数变化的皮尔逊系数均为正,而对照组分别在10/17和13/17个区域观察到负相关系数。结论在皮层下功能中发现了PLWH患者停用EFV后认知能力改善的潜在神经机制,我们的研究结果表明EFV对注意力和处理速度的影响至少部分是由反应性抑制介导的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of infectious disease therapies and interventions, including vaccines and devices. Studies relating to diagnostic products and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, bacterial and fungal infections, viral infections (including HIV/AIDS and hepatitis), parasitological diseases, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, vaccinations and other interventions, and drug-resistance, chronic infections, epidemiology and tropical, emergent, pediatric, dermal and sexually-transmitted diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信