Posterior Nasal Nerve Ablation as a Viable Treatment Option for the Primary Symptom of Postnasal Drip

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Aatin K. Dhanda, Daniel Gorelik, Najm Khan, Masayoshi Takashima, Patrick Bishara, Edward D. McCoul, Aria Jafari, Omar G. Ahmed
{"title":"Posterior Nasal Nerve Ablation as a Viable Treatment Option for the Primary Symptom of Postnasal Drip","authors":"Aatin K. Dhanda, Daniel Gorelik, Najm Khan, Masayoshi Takashima, Patrick Bishara, Edward D. McCoul, Aria Jafari, Omar G. Ahmed","doi":"10.1177/19458924241247107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundPostnasal drip (PND) syndrome is a prevalent complaint encountered in otolaryngology practices. PND may be refractory to medical therapy, and surgical treatments are complicated by side effects.ObjectiveWhile posterior nasal nerve (PNN) ablation has demonstrated efficacy for chronic rhinitis overall, we sought to examine the effect of PNN ablation for patients with PND as their primary complaint.MethodsThis is a retrospective case series study of 40 chronic rhinitis (CR) patients with a primary complaint of PND. Included patients had to have failed medical therapy such as anti-cholinergic nasal sprays, reflux treatments, and/or nasal steroids. Primary outcome measures included 22 item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) PND component and Total Nasal Symptom Score. Secondary outcome measure was subjective improvement, defined as a > 30% improvement in PND symptoms.ResultsMedian follow-up was 138 days (interquartile range: 72-193). 72.5% (29/40) of patients reported at least a 30% improvement in PND symptoms. Mean PND SNOT-22 scores were 4.2/5 (SD = 0.8) pre-procedure versus 1.9/5 (SD = 1.3) post-procedure ( P = .001). PNN ablation response did not correlate to ipratropium bromide nasal spray response, although younger and non-smoker patients had better response rates.ConclusionThis exploratory study of PNN ablation for the primary symptom of PND demonstrates efficacy as assessed by the PND component of SNOT-22 and subjective improvement. These results can be useful in guiding physician–patient discussions in determining treatment options for medically refractory PND.","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924241247107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPostnasal drip (PND) syndrome is a prevalent complaint encountered in otolaryngology practices. PND may be refractory to medical therapy, and surgical treatments are complicated by side effects.ObjectiveWhile posterior nasal nerve (PNN) ablation has demonstrated efficacy for chronic rhinitis overall, we sought to examine the effect of PNN ablation for patients with PND as their primary complaint.MethodsThis is a retrospective case series study of 40 chronic rhinitis (CR) patients with a primary complaint of PND. Included patients had to have failed medical therapy such as anti-cholinergic nasal sprays, reflux treatments, and/or nasal steroids. Primary outcome measures included 22 item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) PND component and Total Nasal Symptom Score. Secondary outcome measure was subjective improvement, defined as a > 30% improvement in PND symptoms.ResultsMedian follow-up was 138 days (interquartile range: 72-193). 72.5% (29/40) of patients reported at least a 30% improvement in PND symptoms. Mean PND SNOT-22 scores were 4.2/5 (SD = 0.8) pre-procedure versus 1.9/5 (SD = 1.3) post-procedure ( P = .001). PNN ablation response did not correlate to ipratropium bromide nasal spray response, although younger and non-smoker patients had better response rates.ConclusionThis exploratory study of PNN ablation for the primary symptom of PND demonstrates efficacy as assessed by the PND component of SNOT-22 and subjective improvement. These results can be useful in guiding physician–patient discussions in determining treatment options for medically refractory PND.
将后鼻神经消融术作为鼻后滴流主症的可行治疗方案
背景鼻后滴流(PND)综合征是耳鼻喉科常见的主诉病症。虽然后鼻孔神经(PNN)消融术对慢性鼻炎具有整体疗效,但我们试图研究 PNN 消融术对以 PND 为主要主诉的患者的效果。研究对象必须是抗胆碱能鼻喷雾剂、反流治疗和/或鼻用类固醇等药物治疗无效的患者。主要结果指标包括 22 项鼻功能测试(SNOT-22)PND 部分和鼻部症状总分。次要结果指标为主观改善,即 PND 症状改善 30%。结果中位随访 138 天(四分位间范围:72-193)。72.5%的患者(29/40)表示 PND 症状至少改善了 30%。术前 PND SNOT-22 评分平均为 4.2/5(SD = 0.8),术后为 1.9/5(SD = 1.3)(P = .001)。PNN 消融反应与异丙托溴铵鼻喷雾剂反应无关,但年轻和非吸烟患者的反应率更高。 结论:这项针对 PND 主要症状的 PNN 消融探索性研究显示,SNOT-22 的 PND 部分和主观改善评估了疗效。这些结果有助于指导医患讨论,确定药物难治性 PND 的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信