Gendered experiences in professional military education: Implications for diversity, equity, and inclusion

Stephanie Erwin, Brandy Jenner, Megan J. Hennessey, Brett Weigle
{"title":"Gendered experiences in professional military education: Implications for diversity, equity, and inclusion","authors":"Stephanie Erwin, Brandy Jenner, Megan J. Hennessey, Brett Weigle","doi":"10.1111/gwao.13131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This multi‐year, cross‐sectional qualitative study investigates gendered experiences of students and faculty at one master's degree‐granting military education institution in the United States. Findings from a grounded theory exploration into institutional climate using focus groups and classroom observations include themes of underrepresentation, tokenization, and dismissal during class conversations, and mischaracterization of diversity of thought. The studied institution responded to these findings by adopting a new gender‐blind class assignment process for students. The authors examined the resultant changes in the learning environment with regards to gender representation in classrooms that had zero, one, two, or three women. A next round of findings reflects students' conformance to gender norms, the prevalence of gatekeeping in class discussion, and the creation of affinity groups as a coping mechanism for underrepresented students. Findings also indicate the burden of intersectional representation falls disproportionately on women students; 73% of women students reflected two or more underrepresented‐group identities compared to just 7% of men students. Encompassing 114 h of classroom observations and 47 interviews with faculty and students, this research represents a rigorous and unprecedented cross‐sectional empirical inquiry into gendered experiences of a master's degree‐granting professional learning environment and has implications for scholars and practitioners working in male‐dominated organizations.","PeriodicalId":501466,"journal":{"name":"Gender, Work & Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender, Work & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This multi‐year, cross‐sectional qualitative study investigates gendered experiences of students and faculty at one master's degree‐granting military education institution in the United States. Findings from a grounded theory exploration into institutional climate using focus groups and classroom observations include themes of underrepresentation, tokenization, and dismissal during class conversations, and mischaracterization of diversity of thought. The studied institution responded to these findings by adopting a new gender‐blind class assignment process for students. The authors examined the resultant changes in the learning environment with regards to gender representation in classrooms that had zero, one, two, or three women. A next round of findings reflects students' conformance to gender norms, the prevalence of gatekeeping in class discussion, and the creation of affinity groups as a coping mechanism for underrepresented students. Findings also indicate the burden of intersectional representation falls disproportionately on women students; 73% of women students reflected two or more underrepresented‐group identities compared to just 7% of men students. Encompassing 114 h of classroom observations and 47 interviews with faculty and students, this research represents a rigorous and unprecedented cross‐sectional empirical inquiry into gendered experiences of a master's degree‐granting professional learning environment and has implications for scholars and practitioners working in male‐dominated organizations.
职业军事教育中的性别体验:对多样性、公平性和包容性的影响
这项多年横断面定性研究调查了美国一所授予硕士学位的军事教育机构的师生的性别体验。通过焦点小组和课堂观察对院校氛围进行了基础理论探索,研究结果包括课堂对话中的代表性不足、象征化和排斥,以及对思想多样性的错误描述等主题。所研究的院校针对这些发现,为学生采用了新的性别盲班分配程序。作者研究了由此带来的学习环境的变化,即在零名、一名、两名或三名女性的课堂上的性别代表性。下一轮研究结果反映了学生对性别规范的遵从、课堂讨论中普遍存在的把关现象,以及作为代表性不足的学生的一种应对机制的亲和小组的建立。研究结果还表明,女学生承担了过重的交叉代表负担;73% 的女学生反映出两种或两种以上的代表不足群体身份,而男学生中只有 7%。这项研究包括 114 小时的课堂观察和 47 次对教师和学生的访谈,是对授予硕士学位的专业学习环境中的性别体验进行的一次严谨而前所未有的横断面实证调查,对在男性主导的组织中工作的学者和从业人员具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信