The association of the 24-hour activity cycle profiles with cognition in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A cross-sectional study

Guilherme Moraes Balbim, Ryan S Falck, Nárlon Cássio Boa Sorte Silva, Arthur F Kramer, Michelle Voss, Teresa Liu-Ambrose
{"title":"The association of the 24-hour activity cycle profiles with cognition in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Guilherme Moraes Balbim, Ryan S Falck, Nárlon Cássio Boa Sorte Silva, Arthur F Kramer, Michelle Voss, Teresa Liu-Ambrose","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The relationship of cognition and the 24-hour activity cycles (24-HAC), encompassing physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep, in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains uncertain. Distinct combinations of 24-HAC behaviours can characterize unique activity profiles and influence cognition. We aimed to characterize 24-HAC activity profiles in older adults with MCI and assess whether differences in cognition exist across profiles. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis utilizing baseline data from three randomized controlled trials involving 253 community-dwelling older adults (55+ years) with MCI (no functional impairment, dementia diagnosis, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment score <26/30). Using MotionWatch8© wrist-worn actigraphy (+5 days), we captured the 24-HAC. Cognition was indexed by the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Plus (ADAS-Cog-Plus). Compositional data and latent profile analyses identified distinct 24-HAC activity profiles. Analysis of covariance examined whether 24-HAC activity profiles differed in cognition. Results Four distinct activity profiles were identified. Profile 1 (“Average 24-HAC,” n=108) engaged in all 24-HAC behaviours around the sample average. Profile 2 (“Active Chillers,” n=64) depicted lower-than-average engagement in physical activity and higher-than-average sedentary behaviour. Profile 3 (“Physical Activity Masters,” n=56) were the most active and the least sedentary. Profile 4 (“Sedentary Savants,” n=25) were the least active and the most sedentary. Sleep was similar across profiles. There were no significant differences in ADAS-Cog-Plus scores between 24-HAC activity profiles (p>0.05). Conclusion Older adults with MCI exhibited four 24-HAC activity profiles conforming to recommended physical activity and sleep guidelines. Nonetheless, cognition was similar across these profiles.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"208 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The relationship of cognition and the 24-hour activity cycles (24-HAC), encompassing physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep, in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains uncertain. Distinct combinations of 24-HAC behaviours can characterize unique activity profiles and influence cognition. We aimed to characterize 24-HAC activity profiles in older adults with MCI and assess whether differences in cognition exist across profiles. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis utilizing baseline data from three randomized controlled trials involving 253 community-dwelling older adults (55+ years) with MCI (no functional impairment, dementia diagnosis, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment score <26/30). Using MotionWatch8© wrist-worn actigraphy (+5 days), we captured the 24-HAC. Cognition was indexed by the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Plus (ADAS-Cog-Plus). Compositional data and latent profile analyses identified distinct 24-HAC activity profiles. Analysis of covariance examined whether 24-HAC activity profiles differed in cognition. Results Four distinct activity profiles were identified. Profile 1 (“Average 24-HAC,” n=108) engaged in all 24-HAC behaviours around the sample average. Profile 2 (“Active Chillers,” n=64) depicted lower-than-average engagement in physical activity and higher-than-average sedentary behaviour. Profile 3 (“Physical Activity Masters,” n=56) were the most active and the least sedentary. Profile 4 (“Sedentary Savants,” n=25) were the least active and the most sedentary. Sleep was similar across profiles. There were no significant differences in ADAS-Cog-Plus scores between 24-HAC activity profiles (p>0.05). Conclusion Older adults with MCI exhibited four 24-HAC activity profiles conforming to recommended physical activity and sleep guidelines. Nonetheless, cognition was similar across these profiles.
轻度认知障碍老年人的 24 小时活动周期特征与认知能力的关系:横断面研究
背景 患有轻度认知障碍(MCI)的老年人的认知能力与 24 小时活动周期(24-HAC)(包括体力活动、久坐行为和睡眠)之间的关系仍不确定。24-HAC 行为的不同组合可以描述独特的活动特征并影响认知。我们的目的是描述患有 MCI 的老年人的 24-HAC 活动特征,并评估不同特征之间是否存在认知差异。方法 我们利用三项随机对照试验的基线数据进行了横断面分析,这些试验涉及 253 名社区居住的 MCI(无功能障碍、痴呆诊断和蒙特利尔认知评估得分 <26/30 分)老年人(55 岁以上)。我们使用 MotionWatch8© 腕戴式行动记录仪(+5 天)采集了 24-HAC 数据。认知能力由阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知增强版(ADAS-Cog-Plus)进行评估。组成数据和潜在特征分析确定了不同的 24-HAC 活动特征。协方差分析检验了 24-HAC 活动特征在认知方面是否存在差异。结果 确定了四种不同的活动特征。特征 1("24-HAC 平均值",n=108)参与了样本平均值附近的所有 24-HAC 行为。特征 2("活跃的寒冷者",人数=64)参与体育活动的程度低于平均水平,而久坐行为高于平均水平。特征 3("体育锻炼高手",人数=56)是最活跃的人群,也是最不喜欢久坐的人群。特征 4("久坐专家",人数=25)最不爱运动,久坐不动的人最多。各组的睡眠情况相似。24-HAC 活动特征之间的 ADAS-Cog-Plus 评分无明显差异(p>0.05)。结论 患有 MCI 的老年人表现出四种 24-HAC 活动特征,符合推荐的体育锻炼和睡眠指南。尽管如此,这些情况下的认知能力是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信