The effect of continuous bilateral parasternal block with lidocaine on patient-controlled analgesia opioid requirement and recovery after open heart surgery: a double-blind randomised controlled trial

Mark Larsson , Ulrik Sartipy , Anders Franco-Cereceda , Anders Öwall , Jan Jakobsson
{"title":"The effect of continuous bilateral parasternal block with lidocaine on patient-controlled analgesia opioid requirement and recovery after open heart surgery: a double-blind randomised controlled trial","authors":"Mark Larsson ,&nbsp;Ulrik Sartipy ,&nbsp;Anders Franco-Cereceda ,&nbsp;Anders Öwall ,&nbsp;Jan Jakobsson","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We hypothesised that a continuous 72-h bilateral parasternal infusion of lidocaine at 2×35 mg h<sup>−1</sup> would decrease pain and the inflammatory response after sternotomy for open heart surgery, subsequently improving quality of recovery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We randomly allocated 45 participants to a 72-h bilateral parasternal infusion of lidocaine or saline commencing after wound closure. The primary outcome was the cumulative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine consumption at 72 h. Secondary outcomes included total morphine requirement, pain, peak expiratory flow, and serum interleukin-6 concentration. In addition, we used an eHealth platform for a 3-month follow-up of pain, analgesic use, and Quality of Recovery-15 scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The 72-h PCA morphine requirement was significantly lower in the lidocaine than the saline group (10 mg [inter-quartile range: 5–19 mg] and 28.2 mg [inter-quartile range: 16–42.5 mg], respectively; <em>P</em>=0.014). The total morphine requirement (including morphine administered before the start of PCA) was significantly lower at 24, 48, and 72 h. Pain was well controlled with no difference in pain scores between treatment groups. The peak expiratory flow was lower in the lidocaine group at 72 h. Interleukin-6 concentrations showed no difference at 24, 48, or 72 h. Quality of Recovery-15 scores did not differ between treatment groups at any time during the 3-month follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>After sternotomy for open heart surgery, a 72-h bilateral parasternal lidocaine infusion significantly decreased PCA and total morphine requirement. However, neither signs of decreased inflammatory response nor an improvement in recovery was seen.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><p>EudraCT number 2018-004672-35.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000236/pdfft?md5=d1f87500618cab5e179e57980abf7be1&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609624000236-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

We hypothesised that a continuous 72-h bilateral parasternal infusion of lidocaine at 2×35 mg h−1 would decrease pain and the inflammatory response after sternotomy for open heart surgery, subsequently improving quality of recovery.

Methods

We randomly allocated 45 participants to a 72-h bilateral parasternal infusion of lidocaine or saline commencing after wound closure. The primary outcome was the cumulative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine consumption at 72 h. Secondary outcomes included total morphine requirement, pain, peak expiratory flow, and serum interleukin-6 concentration. In addition, we used an eHealth platform for a 3-month follow-up of pain, analgesic use, and Quality of Recovery-15 scores.

Results

The 72-h PCA morphine requirement was significantly lower in the lidocaine than the saline group (10 mg [inter-quartile range: 5–19 mg] and 28.2 mg [inter-quartile range: 16–42.5 mg], respectively; P=0.014). The total morphine requirement (including morphine administered before the start of PCA) was significantly lower at 24, 48, and 72 h. Pain was well controlled with no difference in pain scores between treatment groups. The peak expiratory flow was lower in the lidocaine group at 72 h. Interleukin-6 concentrations showed no difference at 24, 48, or 72 h. Quality of Recovery-15 scores did not differ between treatment groups at any time during the 3-month follow-up.

Conclusions

After sternotomy for open heart surgery, a 72-h bilateral parasternal lidocaine infusion significantly decreased PCA and total morphine requirement. However, neither signs of decreased inflammatory response nor an improvement in recovery was seen.

Clinical trial registration

EudraCT number 2018-004672-35.

利多卡因持续双侧胸骨旁阻滞对患者自控镇痛阿片类药物需求和开胸手术后恢复的影响:双盲随机对照试验
背景我们假设,持续 72 小时双侧胸骨旁输注 2×35 毫克/小时的利多卡因将减轻开胸手术胸骨切开术后的疼痛和炎症反应,从而改善恢复质量。方法我们随机分配了 45 名参与者,在伤口闭合后开始 72 小时双侧胸骨旁输注利多卡因或生理盐水。次要结果包括吗啡总需求量、疼痛、呼气流量峰值和血清白细胞介素-6浓度。此外,我们还利用电子健康平台对疼痛、镇痛药使用情况和恢复质量-15 评分进行了为期 3 个月的随访。结果利多卡因组的 72 小时 PCA 吗啡需求量显著低于生理盐水组(分别为 10 毫克 [四分位间范围:5-19 毫克] 和 28.2 毫克 [四分位间范围:16-42.5 毫克];P=0.014)。在 24、48 和 72 小时内,总吗啡需求量(包括 PCA 开始前给药的吗啡)显著降低。在 3 个月的随访中,治疗组之间的恢复质量-15 评分在任何时候都没有差异。结论在开胸手术胸骨切开术后,72 小时的双侧胸骨旁利多卡因输注可显著降低 PCA 和吗啡总需求量。临床试验注册EudraCT编号2018-004672-35。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信