Simona Kratochvílová , Klara Maratova , Zdenek Sumnik , Jana Brunová , Zdeněk Hlávka , Peter Girman , František Saudek , Ondrej Soucek
{"title":"Increase in lumbar spine but not distal radius bone mineral density in adults after pancreas kidney transplantation","authors":"Simona Kratochvílová , Klara Maratova , Zdenek Sumnik , Jana Brunová , Zdeněk Hlávka , Peter Girman , František Saudek , Ondrej Soucek","doi":"10.1016/j.bonr.2024.101764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Osteoporosis occurs in every third individual after simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPKT). Currently used bone measures insufficiently predict their fracture risk. Lumbar spine Trabecular bone score (TBS) and distal radius areal and volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) were monitored for the first time in patients with type 1 diabetes and chronic renal failure after SPKT with steroid-sparing protocol. In 33 subjects (mean age 43.4 ± 9.8 years), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography were performed just after SPKT (baseline) and one and three years later. While TBS <em>Z</em>-scores increased (−1.1 ± 1.2 and −0.3 ± 1.0; p˂0.001, at baseline and year three, respectively), trabecular volumetric BMD <em>Z</em>-scores at distal radius metaphysis did not change during the study (−1.3 ± 1.3 and −1.3 ± 1.0; <em>p</em> = 0.38). Similarly, areal BMD <em>Z</em>-scores increased at lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck (all <em>p</em> < 0.01), but not at the distal radius. SPKT induced bone measures' improvement at lumbar spine and hip but not at distal radius. Before suggesting changes in current clinical care, predictive value of individual bone measures or its combination for fracture risk assessment remains to be elucidated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9043,"journal":{"name":"Bone Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187224000317/pdfft?md5=ea1669cb216b320a782fc48940361f42&pid=1-s2.0-S2352187224000317-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187224000317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Osteoporosis occurs in every third individual after simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPKT). Currently used bone measures insufficiently predict their fracture risk. Lumbar spine Trabecular bone score (TBS) and distal radius areal and volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) were monitored for the first time in patients with type 1 diabetes and chronic renal failure after SPKT with steroid-sparing protocol. In 33 subjects (mean age 43.4 ± 9.8 years), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography were performed just after SPKT (baseline) and one and three years later. While TBS Z-scores increased (−1.1 ± 1.2 and −0.3 ± 1.0; p˂0.001, at baseline and year three, respectively), trabecular volumetric BMD Z-scores at distal radius metaphysis did not change during the study (−1.3 ± 1.3 and −1.3 ± 1.0; p = 0.38). Similarly, areal BMD Z-scores increased at lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck (all p < 0.01), but not at the distal radius. SPKT induced bone measures' improvement at lumbar spine and hip but not at distal radius. Before suggesting changes in current clinical care, predictive value of individual bone measures or its combination for fracture risk assessment remains to be elucidated.
Bone ReportsMedicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
444
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍:
Bone Reports is an interdisciplinary forum for the rapid publication of Original Research Articles and Case Reports across basic, translational and clinical aspects of bone and mineral metabolism. The journal publishes papers that are scientifically sound, with the peer review process focused principally on verifying sound methodologies, and correct data analysis and interpretation. We welcome studies either replicating or failing to replicate a previous study, and null findings. We fulfil a critical and current need to enhance research by publishing reproducibility studies and null findings.