The emergence and historical evolution of innovation networks: On the factors promoting and hampering patent collaboration in technological lagging economies

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Sergio Barbosa , Patricio Sáiz , José L. Zofío
{"title":"The emergence and historical evolution of innovation networks: On the factors promoting and hampering patent collaboration in technological lagging economies","authors":"Sergio Barbosa ,&nbsp;Patricio Sáiz ,&nbsp;José L. Zofío","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.104990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Collaboration and research networks are nowadays central to innovation because they favor knowledge interactions and complex approaches to challenging problems. This study explores the factors underlying the emergence and evolution of innovation networks in the past, using as example the case of Spain, a backward country regarding R&amp;D performance. Combining, for the first time, historical patent data, social network analysis, and discrete choice regression techniques we test distinct institutional, geographical, and sectoral factors that triggered or hampered collaboration over the long term, i.e., the growth in the connections of individual co-patentees within innovation groups. The findings are relevant and demonstrate, inter alia, that in the Spanish case the length of intellectual monopolies did not foster collaboration, while geographical/technological diversification was key to enhance collaborative patterns in the past. The analysis also demonstrates that the likelihood of increasing collaboration over time depended on the initial level of connections (degree) the patentee had, confirming the existence of preferential attachment, even within the context of an emerging and disconnected network. However, belonging to larger innovation groups (size of the network components) did not promote <em>per se</em> greater interactions, suggesting that institutional weaknesses and backward innovation trends prevented the existence of positive payoffs from increased connectivity. The results have direct R&amp;D policy implications for both nowadays developing countries and innovation leaders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"53 5","pages":"Article 104990"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324000398/pdfft?md5=997c8a953fe5371cc4fa421a43ca9fac&pid=1-s2.0-S0048733324000398-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324000398","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaboration and research networks are nowadays central to innovation because they favor knowledge interactions and complex approaches to challenging problems. This study explores the factors underlying the emergence and evolution of innovation networks in the past, using as example the case of Spain, a backward country regarding R&D performance. Combining, for the first time, historical patent data, social network analysis, and discrete choice regression techniques we test distinct institutional, geographical, and sectoral factors that triggered or hampered collaboration over the long term, i.e., the growth in the connections of individual co-patentees within innovation groups. The findings are relevant and demonstrate, inter alia, that in the Spanish case the length of intellectual monopolies did not foster collaboration, while geographical/technological diversification was key to enhance collaborative patterns in the past. The analysis also demonstrates that the likelihood of increasing collaboration over time depended on the initial level of connections (degree) the patentee had, confirming the existence of preferential attachment, even within the context of an emerging and disconnected network. However, belonging to larger innovation groups (size of the network components) did not promote per se greater interactions, suggesting that institutional weaknesses and backward innovation trends prevented the existence of positive payoffs from increased connectivity. The results have direct R&D policy implications for both nowadays developing countries and innovation leaders.

创新网络的出现和历史演变:技术落后经济体中促进和阻碍专利合作的因素
如今,合作与研究网络已成为创新的核心,因为它们有利于知识的互动和解决挑战性问题的复杂方法。本研究以研发落后国家西班牙为例,探讨了过去创新网络出现和演变的基本因素。我们首次将历史专利数据、社会网络分析和离散选择回归技术相结合,测试了引发或阻碍长期合作的不同制度、地理和部门因素,即创新团体中共同专利人个人联系的增长情况。研究结果具有相关性,尤其表明在西班牙的案例中,知识垄断的时间长短并不能促进合作,而地理/技术多样化则是过去加强合作模式的关键。分析还表明,随着时间的推移,合作增加的可能性取决于专利权人最初的联系水平(程度),这证实了优先依附关系的存在,即使是在新兴的、互不关联的网络背景下也是如此。然而,隶属于更大的创新群体(网络组成部分的规模)本身并不能促进更多的互动,这表明体制上的弱点和落后的创新趋势阻碍了增加连通性所带来的积极回报。研究结果对当今的发展中国家和创新领导者都有直接的研发政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信