Beyond prevention: Unveiling the benefits of triple vaccination on COVID-19 severity and resource utilization in solid organ transplant recipients

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
Jared R. Zhang , John C. Johnson , Richard G. Preble , Muhammad Mujtaba , A. Scott Lea , Heather L. Stevenson , Michael Kueht
{"title":"Beyond prevention: Unveiling the benefits of triple vaccination on COVID-19 severity and resource utilization in solid organ transplant recipients","authors":"Jared R. Zhang ,&nbsp;John C. Johnson ,&nbsp;Richard G. Preble ,&nbsp;Muhammad Mujtaba ,&nbsp;A. Scott Lea ,&nbsp;Heather L. Stevenson ,&nbsp;Michael Kueht","doi":"10.1016/j.trim.2024.102048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Despite the widespread reduction in COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality attributed to vaccination in the general population, vaccine efficacy in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) remains under-characterized. This study aimed to investigate clinically relevant outcomes on double and triple-vaccinated versus unvaccinated SOTR with COVID-19.</p></div><div><h3>Study design and setting</h3><p>A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study was performed utilizing data from the US Collaborative Network Database within TriNetX (<em>n</em> = 117,905,631). We recruited vaccinated and unvaccinated (matched controls) SOTR with COVID-19 over two time periods to control for vaccine availability: December 2020 to October 2022 (bi-dose, double-dose vaccine effectiveness) and December 2020 to April 2023 (tri-dose, triple-dose vaccine effectiveness). A total of 42 factors associated with COVID-19 disease severity were controlled for including age, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension. We monitored 30-day outcomes including acute respiratory failure, intubation, and death following a diagnosis of COVID-19.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Subjects were categorized into two cohorts based on the two time periods: bi-dose cohort (vaccinated, <em>n</em> = 462; unvaccinated, <em>n</em> = 20,998); tri-dose cohort (vaccinated, <em>n</em> = 517; unvaccinated, <em>n</em> = 23,061).Compared to unvaccinated SOTR, 30-day mortality was significantly lower for vaccinated subjects in both cohorts: tri-dose (2.0% vs 7.5%, HR = 0.22 [95% CI: 0.11, 0.46]); bi-dose (3.7% vs 8.2%, HR = 0.43 [95% CI: 0.24, 0.76]). Hospital admission rates were similar between bi-dose vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects (33.1% vs 28.6%, HR = 1.2 [95% CI: 0.95, 1.52]). In contrast, tri-dose vaccinated subjects had a significantly lower likelihood of hospital admission (29.4% vs 36.6%, HR = 0.74 [95% CI: 0.6, 0.91]). Intubation rates were significantly lower for triple-vaccinated- (2.3% vs 5.2%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), but not double-vaccinated subjects (3.0% vs 5.2%, <em>p</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19, triple vaccination, but not double vaccination, against SARS-CoV-2 was associated with significantly less hospital resource utilization, decreased disease severity, and fewer short-term complications. These real-world data from extensively matched controls support the protective effects of COVID-19 vaccination with boosters in this vulnerable population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23304,"journal":{"name":"Transplant immunology","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 102048"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966327424000649","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Despite the widespread reduction in COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality attributed to vaccination in the general population, vaccine efficacy in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) remains under-characterized. This study aimed to investigate clinically relevant outcomes on double and triple-vaccinated versus unvaccinated SOTR with COVID-19.

Study design and setting

A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study was performed utilizing data from the US Collaborative Network Database within TriNetX (n = 117,905,631). We recruited vaccinated and unvaccinated (matched controls) SOTR with COVID-19 over two time periods to control for vaccine availability: December 2020 to October 2022 (bi-dose, double-dose vaccine effectiveness) and December 2020 to April 2023 (tri-dose, triple-dose vaccine effectiveness). A total of 42 factors associated with COVID-19 disease severity were controlled for including age, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension. We monitored 30-day outcomes including acute respiratory failure, intubation, and death following a diagnosis of COVID-19.

Results

Subjects were categorized into two cohorts based on the two time periods: bi-dose cohort (vaccinated, n = 462; unvaccinated, n = 20,998); tri-dose cohort (vaccinated, n = 517; unvaccinated, n = 23,061).Compared to unvaccinated SOTR, 30-day mortality was significantly lower for vaccinated subjects in both cohorts: tri-dose (2.0% vs 7.5%, HR = 0.22 [95% CI: 0.11, 0.46]); bi-dose (3.7% vs 8.2%, HR = 0.43 [95% CI: 0.24, 0.76]). Hospital admission rates were similar between bi-dose vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects (33.1% vs 28.6%, HR = 1.2 [95% CI: 0.95, 1.52]). In contrast, tri-dose vaccinated subjects had a significantly lower likelihood of hospital admission (29.4% vs 36.6%, HR = 0.74 [95% CI: 0.6, 0.91]). Intubation rates were significantly lower for triple-vaccinated- (2.3% vs 5.2%, p < 0.05), but not double-vaccinated subjects (3.0% vs 5.2%, p > 0.05).

Conclusion

In solid organ transplant recipients with COVID-19, triple vaccination, but not double vaccination, against SARS-CoV-2 was associated with significantly less hospital resource utilization, decreased disease severity, and fewer short-term complications. These real-world data from extensively matched controls support the protective effects of COVID-19 vaccination with boosters in this vulnerable population.

超越预防:揭示三联疫苗接种对COVID-19严重程度和实体器官移植受者资源利用率的益处
目的尽管在普通人群中接种疫苗后,COVID-19 相关的发病率和死亡率普遍下降,但疫苗在实体器官移植受者 (SOTR) 中的疗效仍未得到充分描述。本研究旨在调查接种COVID-19双联和三联疫苗与未接种COVID-19的SOTR的临床相关结果。研究设计和背景利用TriNetX中的美国协作网络数据库(n = 117,905,631)中的数据,进行了一项倾向得分匹配队列回顾性研究。我们在两个时间段内招募了接种和未接种 COVID-19 的 SOTR(匹配对照),以控制疫苗的可用性:2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 10 月(双剂,双剂量疫苗效果)和 2020 年 12 月至 2023 年 4 月(三剂,三剂量疫苗效果)。共控制了 42 个与 COVID-19 疾病严重程度相关的因素,包括年龄、肥胖、糖尿病和高血压。我们监测了 30 天的结果,包括诊断为 COVID-19 后的急性呼吸衰竭、插管和死亡。结果根据两个时间段将受试者分为两个队列:双剂量队列(已接种疫苗,n = 462;未接种疫苗,n = 20998);三剂量队列(已接种疫苗,n = 517;未接种疫苗,n = 23061)。与未接种 SOTR 相比,两个队列中接种疫苗者的 30 天死亡率均显著降低:三剂量(2.0% vs 7.5%,HR = 0.22 [95% CI:0.11, 0.46]);双剂量(3.7% vs 8.2%,HR = 0.43 [95% CI:0.24, 0.76])。接种双剂量疫苗和未接种疫苗的受试者入院率相似(33.1% vs 28.6%,HR = 1.2 [95% CI:0.95, 1.52])。相比之下,接种三剂疫苗的受试者入院的可能性明显较低(29.4% vs 36.6%,HR = 0.74 [95% CI:0.6, 0.91])。结论在患有 COVID-19 的实体器官移植受者中,接种三联疫苗(而非二联疫苗)与显著减少医院资源使用、降低疾病严重程度和减少短期并发症有关。这些来自广泛匹配的对照组的实际数据支持 COVID-19 疫苗接种和加强免疫对这一易感人群的保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant immunology
Transplant immunology 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
198
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Transplant Immunology will publish up-to-date information on all aspects of the broad field it encompasses. The journal will be directed at (basic) scientists, tissue typers, transplant physicians and surgeons, and research and data on all immunological aspects of organ-, tissue- and (haematopoietic) stem cell transplantation are of potential interest to the readers of Transplant Immunology. Original papers, Review articles and Hypotheses will be considered for publication and submitted manuscripts will be rapidly peer-reviewed and published. They will be judged on the basis of scientific merit, originality, timeliness and quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信