Impact of left atrial wall motion assumptions in fluid simulations on proposed predictors of thrombus formation

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Henrik A. Kjeldsberg, Carlos Albors, Jordi Mill, David Viladés Medel, Oscar Camara, Joakim Sundnes, Kristian Valen-Sendstad
{"title":"Impact of left atrial wall motion assumptions in fluid simulations on proposed predictors of thrombus formation","authors":"Henrik A. Kjeldsberg,&nbsp;Carlos Albors,&nbsp;Jordi Mill,&nbsp;David Viladés Medel,&nbsp;Oscar Camara,&nbsp;Joakim Sundnes,&nbsp;Kristian Valen-Sendstad","doi":"10.1002/cnm.3825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) poses a significant risk of stroke due to thrombus formation, which primarily occurs in the left atrial appendage (LAA). Medical image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations can provide valuable insight into patient-specific hemodynamics and could potentially enhance personalized assessment of thrombus risk. However, the importance of accurately representing the left atrial (LA) wall dynamics has not been fully resolved. In this study, we compared four modeling scenarios; rigid walls, a generic wall motion based on a reference motion, a semi-generic wall motion based on patient-specific motion, and patient-specific wall motion based on medical images. We considered a LA geometry acquired from 4D computed tomography during AF, systematically performed convergence tests to assess the numerical accuracy of our solution strategy, and quantified the differences between the four approaches. The results revealed that wall motion had no discernible impact on LA cavity hemodynamics, nor on the markers that indicate thrombus formation. However, the flow patterns within the LAA deviated significantly in the rigid model, indicating that the assumption of rigid walls may lead to errors in the estimated risk factors. In contrast, the generic, semi-generic, and patient-specific cases were qualitatively similar. The results highlight the crucial role of wall motion on hemodynamics and predictors of thrombus formation, and also demonstrate the potential of using a generic motion model as a surrogate for the more complex patient-specific motion. While the present study considered a single case, the employed CFD framework is entirely open-source and designed for adaptability, allowing for integration of additional models and generic motions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50349,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"40 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cnm.3825","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cnm.3825","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) poses a significant risk of stroke due to thrombus formation, which primarily occurs in the left atrial appendage (LAA). Medical image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations can provide valuable insight into patient-specific hemodynamics and could potentially enhance personalized assessment of thrombus risk. However, the importance of accurately representing the left atrial (LA) wall dynamics has not been fully resolved. In this study, we compared four modeling scenarios; rigid walls, a generic wall motion based on a reference motion, a semi-generic wall motion based on patient-specific motion, and patient-specific wall motion based on medical images. We considered a LA geometry acquired from 4D computed tomography during AF, systematically performed convergence tests to assess the numerical accuracy of our solution strategy, and quantified the differences between the four approaches. The results revealed that wall motion had no discernible impact on LA cavity hemodynamics, nor on the markers that indicate thrombus formation. However, the flow patterns within the LAA deviated significantly in the rigid model, indicating that the assumption of rigid walls may lead to errors in the estimated risk factors. In contrast, the generic, semi-generic, and patient-specific cases were qualitatively similar. The results highlight the crucial role of wall motion on hemodynamics and predictors of thrombus formation, and also demonstrate the potential of using a generic motion model as a surrogate for the more complex patient-specific motion. While the present study considered a single case, the employed CFD framework is entirely open-source and designed for adaptability, allowing for integration of additional models and generic motions.

Abstract Image

流体模拟中左心房壁运动假设对血栓形成预测指标的影响
心房颤动(房颤)主要发生在左心房阑尾(LAA),其血栓形成会导致中风的重大风险。基于医学影像的计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟可为患者特定的血液动力学提供有价值的见解,并有可能提高血栓风险的个性化评估。然而,准确反映左心房(LA)壁动态的重要性尚未完全解决。在这项研究中,我们比较了四种建模方案:刚性壁、基于参考运动的通用壁运动、基于患者特定运动的半通用壁运动和基于医学影像的患者特定壁运动。我们考虑了房颤期间从四维计算机断层扫描中获取的 LA 几何图形,系统地进行了收敛测试以评估我们的求解策略的数值精度,并量化了四种方法之间的差异。结果显示,室壁运动对 LA 腔血流动力学和血栓形成的标志物没有明显影响。然而,在刚性模型中,LAA 腔内的血流模式出现了明显偏差,这表明刚性腔壁的假设可能会导致估计的风险因素出现误差。相比之下,通用模型、半通用模型和患者特异性模型在质量上是相似的。研究结果凸显了室壁运动对血流动力学和血栓形成预测因素的关键作用,同时也证明了使用通用运动模型替代更复杂的患者特异性运动的潜力。虽然本研究只考虑了一个病例,但所采用的 CFD 框架完全开源,设计具有适应性,可以整合其他模型和通用运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: All differential equation based models for biomedical applications and their novel solutions (using either established numerical methods such as finite difference, finite element and finite volume methods or new numerical methods) are within the scope of this journal. Manuscripts with experimental and analytical themes are also welcome if a component of the paper deals with numerical methods. Special cases that may not involve differential equations such as image processing, meshing and artificial intelligence are within the scope. Any research that is broadly linked to the wellbeing of the human body, either directly or indirectly, is also within the scope of this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信