Riverine aquatic plants trap propagules and fine sediment: Implications for ecosystem engineering and management under contrasting land uses

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Scott Alexander McKendrick, Matthew James Burns, Moss Imberger, Kathryn Lesley Russell, Joe Greet
{"title":"Riverine aquatic plants trap propagules and fine sediment: Implications for ecosystem engineering and management under contrasting land uses","authors":"Scott Alexander McKendrick,&nbsp;Matthew James Burns,&nbsp;Moss Imberger,&nbsp;Kathryn Lesley Russell,&nbsp;Joe Greet","doi":"10.1002/esp.5844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plants in streams act as physical ecosystem engineers, both influencing and responding to hydrogeomorphic processes such as fine sediment retention. Instream vegetation may also influence propagule dispersal and retention, shaping plant community dynamics. These plant-sediment interactions may result in synergistic feedback promoting hydrogeomorphic complexity and biogeomorphic succession. However, the role of aquatic plants (submerged or mostly submerged) in trapping propagules, fine sediment and organic matter in degraded lowland streams is uncertain. In this study, we sampled sediment (≤5 cm depth) from eight streams ranging in land use from rural to urban, including within patches of aquatic vegetation and unvegetated locations. We conducted a propagule bank trial to identify the abundance and diversity of propagules and analysed the particle size and organic matter composition of the samples. A total of 8,365 seedlings from 113 plant species were recorded with a range of hydrological tolerances. Aquatic plants retained 56% more propagules and 32% more species, and marginal vegetation retained 250% more propagules and 48% more species, than open channel locations (the least retentive location). Similar patterns were found for fine sediment and organic matter retention. Propagule bank communities were different across land-use types but not sampling locations. The trapping effect of aquatic vegetation diminished as catchments became more urbanised. This study provides evidence that aquatic plants retain more propagules and species, and fine sediment and organic matter than vegetation-free channel locations. Improving aquatic vegetation in streams may be an important early step in restoring hydrogeomorphic complexity and propagule retention, and the facilitation of biogeomorphic succession in degraded streams. Unfortunately, heavily urbanised streams with flashy flow regimes are unlikely to benefit from this function unless catchment-scale hydrology is addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11408,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/esp.5844","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.5844","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plants in streams act as physical ecosystem engineers, both influencing and responding to hydrogeomorphic processes such as fine sediment retention. Instream vegetation may also influence propagule dispersal and retention, shaping plant community dynamics. These plant-sediment interactions may result in synergistic feedback promoting hydrogeomorphic complexity and biogeomorphic succession. However, the role of aquatic plants (submerged or mostly submerged) in trapping propagules, fine sediment and organic matter in degraded lowland streams is uncertain. In this study, we sampled sediment (≤5 cm depth) from eight streams ranging in land use from rural to urban, including within patches of aquatic vegetation and unvegetated locations. We conducted a propagule bank trial to identify the abundance and diversity of propagules and analysed the particle size and organic matter composition of the samples. A total of 8,365 seedlings from 113 plant species were recorded with a range of hydrological tolerances. Aquatic plants retained 56% more propagules and 32% more species, and marginal vegetation retained 250% more propagules and 48% more species, than open channel locations (the least retentive location). Similar patterns were found for fine sediment and organic matter retention. Propagule bank communities were different across land-use types but not sampling locations. The trapping effect of aquatic vegetation diminished as catchments became more urbanised. This study provides evidence that aquatic plants retain more propagules and species, and fine sediment and organic matter than vegetation-free channel locations. Improving aquatic vegetation in streams may be an important early step in restoring hydrogeomorphic complexity and propagule retention, and the facilitation of biogeomorphic succession in degraded streams. Unfortunately, heavily urbanised streams with flashy flow regimes are unlikely to benefit from this function unless catchment-scale hydrology is addressed.

Abstract Image

河流水生植物捕获繁殖体和细小沉积物:不同土地用途下的生态系统工程与管理的意义
溪流中的植物是物理生态系统的工程师,既能影响水文地质过程,也能对其做出反应,如细小沉积物的滞留。溪流中的植被还可能影响繁殖体的传播和滞留,从而影响植物群落的动态。这些植物与泥沙的相互作用可能会产生协同反馈,促进水文地质的复杂性和生物地貌的演替。然而,水生植物(沉水植物或大部分沉水植物)在退化的低地溪流中截留繁殖体、细沉积物和有机物的作用尚不确定。在这项研究中,我们对 8 条溪流的沉积物(≤5 厘米深)进行了取样,这些溪流的土地利用范围从农村到城市,包括水生植被区和无植被区。我们进行了繁殖体库试验,以确定繁殖体的丰度和多样性,并分析了样本的颗粒大小和有机物成分。共记录了 113 种植物的 8365 株幼苗,它们的水文耐受性各不相同。水生植物保留的繁殖体和物种分别比明渠地点(保留最少的地点)多 56% 和 32%,边缘植被保留的繁殖体和物种分别比明渠地点多 250% 和 48%。在细沉积物和有机物保留方面也发现了类似的模式。不同土地利用类型的繁殖体库群落各不相同,但取样地点不同。随着集水区的城市化程度越来越高,水生植物的截留作用也在减弱。这项研究提供的证据表明,与没有植被的河道地点相比,水生植物能保留更多的繁殖体和物种以及细小沉积物和有机物。改善溪流中的水生植被可能是恢复水文地质复杂性和繁殖体保留以及促进退化溪流生物地貌演替的重要早期步骤。遗憾的是,除非集水尺度的水文问题得到解决,否则严重城市化、水流湍急的溪流不太可能从这一功能中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
215
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms is an interdisciplinary international journal concerned with: the interactions between surface processes and landforms and landscapes; that lead to physical, chemical and biological changes; and which in turn create; current landscapes and the geological record of past landscapes. Its focus is core to both physical geographical and geological communities, and also the wider geosciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信