Ana Clara Souza-Oliveira, Marco Aurélio Benini Paschoal, Thiago Rezende, Rachel Alvarenga-Brant, Mauro Henrique Nogueira Abreu, Carolina Castro Martins-Pfeifer
{"title":"Adhesive restorations in primary dentition: A retrospective analysis of survival rate and associated factors","authors":"Ana Clara Souza-Oliveira, Marco Aurélio Benini Paschoal, Thiago Rezende, Rachel Alvarenga-Brant, Mauro Henrique Nogueira Abreu, Carolina Castro Martins-Pfeifer","doi":"10.1111/ipd.13190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Several clinical and individual factors may play a role in the survival rate of dental restorations, such as characteristics related to the child’s age and oral hygiene, and factors associated with the tooth, such as the type of material and number of surfaces to be restored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To analyse the survival rate of adhesive restorations on primary teeth and factors associated with restoration survival.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>The study included dental records of children aged 3–12 years having received adhesive restorations on primary teeth at a Brazilian dental school between 2009 and 2019. A Kaplan–Meier survival curve was used to plot survival rates using the log-rank test. A multivariate Cox regression model was run to identify individual and dental factors associated with restoration failure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Result<b>s</b></h3>\n \n <p>The sample comprised 269 restored teeth in 111 children. Survival curves were similar for all materials (<i>p</i> = .20) and types of isolation (<i>p</i> = .05). The annual failure rate was 3.60% for glass ionomer cement, 1.23% for resin-modified glass ionomer cement and 0.40% for composite resin. The following variables were associated with more failures: Class II restoration compared with Class I (HR = 1.96; 95%CI: 1.28–2.99, <i>p</i> < .001), proportion of decayed teeth (HR = 11.89; 95%CI: 2.80–50.57, <i>p</i> < .001) and child's age (HR = 1.17; 95%CI: 1.06–1.29, <i>p</i> < .001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The different materials and types of isolation had similar survival rates. Children with more decayed teeth have an increased risk of restoration failure.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14268,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":"34 6","pages":"906-914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ipd.13190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Several clinical and individual factors may play a role in the survival rate of dental restorations, such as characteristics related to the child’s age and oral hygiene, and factors associated with the tooth, such as the type of material and number of surfaces to be restored.
Aim
To analyse the survival rate of adhesive restorations on primary teeth and factors associated with restoration survival.
Design
The study included dental records of children aged 3–12 years having received adhesive restorations on primary teeth at a Brazilian dental school between 2009 and 2019. A Kaplan–Meier survival curve was used to plot survival rates using the log-rank test. A multivariate Cox regression model was run to identify individual and dental factors associated with restoration failure.
Results
The sample comprised 269 restored teeth in 111 children. Survival curves were similar for all materials (p = .20) and types of isolation (p = .05). The annual failure rate was 3.60% for glass ionomer cement, 1.23% for resin-modified glass ionomer cement and 0.40% for composite resin. The following variables were associated with more failures: Class II restoration compared with Class I (HR = 1.96; 95%CI: 1.28–2.99, p < .001), proportion of decayed teeth (HR = 11.89; 95%CI: 2.80–50.57, p < .001) and child's age (HR = 1.17; 95%CI: 1.06–1.29, p < .001).
Conclusion
The different materials and types of isolation had similar survival rates. Children with more decayed teeth have an increased risk of restoration failure.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry was formed in 1991 by the merger of the Journals of the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry and the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry and is published bi-monthly. It has true international scope and aims to promote the highest standard of education, practice and research in paediatric dentistry world-wide.
International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry publishes papers on all aspects of paediatric dentistry including: growth and development, behaviour management, diagnosis, prevention, restorative treatment and issue relating to medically compromised children or those with disabilities. This peer-reviewed journal features scientific articles, reviews, case reports, clinical techniques, short communications and abstracts of current paediatric dental research. Analytical studies with a scientific novelty value are preferred to descriptive studies. Case reports illustrating unusual conditions and clinically relevant observations are acceptable but must be of sufficiently high quality to be considered for publication; particularly the illustrative material must be of the highest quality.