Yes, It Is Polyphony and a Map: Revisiting the 72 Verses of St. Martial

IF 0.3 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Arts Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.3390/arts13020073
Laura Steenberge
{"title":"Yes, It Is Polyphony and a Map: Revisiting the 72 Verses of St. Martial","authors":"Laura Steenberge","doi":"10.3390/arts13020073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The enigmatic 72 Verses for St. Martial is one of the many works by Ademar de Chabannes (989–1034) crafted to promote the false narrative that St. Martial of Limoges, rather than being a third-century bishop, was actually a first-century apostle. The composition is visually striking due to the acrostic formed from the first letter of each tercet, MARCIALIS APOSTOLVS XRISTI, and its two overlapping melodies, one in black ink and the other in red. The relationship between the two notations is the subject of debate: Paul Hooreman’s conclusion that they are two variations of the same monophonic chant is countered by Manuel Pedro Ferreira, who argues that Hooreman’s reasoning is insufficient to rule out polyphony. I use Ferreira’s assessment as a jumping-off point for the current analysis, which investigates the compositional processes underlying the creation of the 72 Verses. Hooreman describes many details in the chant as subject to disorganization, scribal error, lack of ability, etc., but when the chant is analyzed polyphonically, these problems resolve. Beyond the music itself, the chant’s unusual polyphonic structure features reveals that the chant is structured around medieval maps, moving between a mappa mundi and the celestial spheres.","PeriodicalId":30547,"journal":{"name":"Arts","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/arts13020073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The enigmatic 72 Verses for St. Martial is one of the many works by Ademar de Chabannes (989–1034) crafted to promote the false narrative that St. Martial of Limoges, rather than being a third-century bishop, was actually a first-century apostle. The composition is visually striking due to the acrostic formed from the first letter of each tercet, MARCIALIS APOSTOLVS XRISTI, and its two overlapping melodies, one in black ink and the other in red. The relationship between the two notations is the subject of debate: Paul Hooreman’s conclusion that they are two variations of the same monophonic chant is countered by Manuel Pedro Ferreira, who argues that Hooreman’s reasoning is insufficient to rule out polyphony. I use Ferreira’s assessment as a jumping-off point for the current analysis, which investigates the compositional processes underlying the creation of the 72 Verses. Hooreman describes many details in the chant as subject to disorganization, scribal error, lack of ability, etc., but when the chant is analyzed polyphonically, these problems resolve. Beyond the music itself, the chant’s unusual polyphonic structure features reveals that the chant is structured around medieval maps, moving between a mappa mundi and the celestial spheres.
是的,这是复调和地图:重温圣马蒂亚尔的 72 首诗歌
神秘的《圣马蒂亚尔 72 首诗歌》是阿德马尔-德-沙班纳(Ademar de Chabannes,989-1034 年)为宣传利摩日的圣马蒂亚尔(St. Martial of Limoges,而非三世纪的主教,实际上是一世纪的使徒)这一虚假说法而精心创作的众多作品之一。这首曲子极具视觉冲击力,因为每个小节的第一个字母 "MARCIALIS APOSTOLVS XRISTI "和两个重叠的旋律(一个用黑色墨水书写,另一个用红色墨水书写)形成了一个缩略词。这两种记谱法之间的关系备受争议:保罗-胡尔曼(Paul Hooreman)认为它们是同一单音圣咏的两种变体,曼努埃尔-佩德罗-费雷拉(Manuel Pedro Ferreira)则认为胡尔曼的推理不足以排除复调的可能性。我将费雷拉的评价作为当前分析的起点,研究 72 首诗歌的创作过程。胡尔曼指出,圣咏中的许多细节都存在混乱、抄写错误、能力不足等问题,但如果对圣咏进行复调分析,这些问题就会迎刃而解。除了音乐本身,圣咏不同寻常的复调结构特征还揭示了圣咏的结构是围绕中世纪地图展开的,在世界地图和天球之间游走。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arts
Arts HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
40.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信