Interrelatedness of Family and Parenting Risk Factors for Juvenile Delinquency: A Network Study in U.S. and Dutch Juveniles

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q3 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Claudia E. van der Put, Mark Assink
{"title":"Interrelatedness of Family and Parenting Risk Factors for Juvenile Delinquency: A Network Study in U.S. and Dutch Juveniles","authors":"Claudia E. van der Put, Mark Assink","doi":"10.1177/0306624x241240697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Family interventions that address a diversity of family and parenting factors are often used to prevent juvenile delinquency, but are effective to only a limited extent. This study applied a network approach to risk factors for juvenile delinquency and examined the interrelatedness of specifically family and parenting risk factors in a U.S. and separate Dutch sample of juveniles and their family members. Differences in interrelatedness between these samples were examined as well. Secondary analyses were conducted on data collected in the United States with the Washington State Juvenile Court Assessment (WSJCA) and on data collected in the Netherlands with a Dutch-adapted translation of the WSJCA. Network analyses were performed, separately for the U.S. ( N = 13,613) and Dutch ( N = 3,630) sample, on seven risk factors that were assessed with a three-point Likert scale ranging from each factor’s protective side to a corresponding risk side. In the U.S. sample network, “inadequate parental punishment” and “lack of parental supervision” that both refer to an authoritarian parenting style were the most “central” factors and had the strongest associations with the other risk factors. In the Dutch sample network, “the family not providing opportunities” and “inadequate parental reward” were the most “central” factors, which refer to an authoritative parenting style. The family and parenting factors identified as most central in the networks may be promising to address in family interventions, as it can be expected that both the directly addressed problems and their correlated problems will improve. The current results may inform attempts to strengthen family interventions for juvenile delinquency in the United States and the Netherlands.","PeriodicalId":48041,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x241240697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Family interventions that address a diversity of family and parenting factors are often used to prevent juvenile delinquency, but are effective to only a limited extent. This study applied a network approach to risk factors for juvenile delinquency and examined the interrelatedness of specifically family and parenting risk factors in a U.S. and separate Dutch sample of juveniles and their family members. Differences in interrelatedness between these samples were examined as well. Secondary analyses were conducted on data collected in the United States with the Washington State Juvenile Court Assessment (WSJCA) and on data collected in the Netherlands with a Dutch-adapted translation of the WSJCA. Network analyses were performed, separately for the U.S. ( N = 13,613) and Dutch ( N = 3,630) sample, on seven risk factors that were assessed with a three-point Likert scale ranging from each factor’s protective side to a corresponding risk side. In the U.S. sample network, “inadequate parental punishment” and “lack of parental supervision” that both refer to an authoritarian parenting style were the most “central” factors and had the strongest associations with the other risk factors. In the Dutch sample network, “the family not providing opportunities” and “inadequate parental reward” were the most “central” factors, which refer to an authoritative parenting style. The family and parenting factors identified as most central in the networks may be promising to address in family interventions, as it can be expected that both the directly addressed problems and their correlated problems will improve. The current results may inform attempts to strengthen family interventions for juvenile delinquency in the United States and the Netherlands.
青少年犯罪的家庭和父母风险因素的相互关联性:美国和荷兰青少年网络研究
针对各种家庭和养育因素的家庭干预措施经常被用来预防青少年犯罪,但效果有限。本研究对青少年犯罪的风险因素采用了网络方法,并在美国和荷兰的青少年及其家庭成员样本中研究了具体的家庭和养育风险因素之间的相互关联性。此外,还研究了这些样本之间相互关联性的差异。我们对在美国通过华盛顿州少年法庭评估(Washington State Juvenile Court Assessment,WSJCA)收集到的数据和在荷兰通过荷兰语翻译的WSJCA收集到的数据进行了二次分析。对美国样本(13,613 人)和荷兰样本(3,630 人)的七项风险因素分别进行了网络分析。在美国的样本网络中,"父母惩罚不足 "和 "父母缺乏监督 "都是指专制的养育方式,是最 "核心 "的因素,与其他风险因素的关联性最强。在荷兰的样本网络中,"家庭不提供机会 "和 "父母奖励不足 "是最 "核心 "的因素,它们指的是专制型的养育方式。在网络中被确定为最核心的家庭和养育因素可能是家庭干预中有望解决的问题,因为可以预期直接解决的问题及其相关问题都将得到改善。目前的研究结果可为美国和荷兰加强对青少年犯罪的家庭干预提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Press/Politics is an interdisciplinary journal for the analysis and discussion of the role of the press and politics in a globalized world. The Journal is interested in theoretical and empirical research on the linkages between the news media and political processes and actors. Special attention is given to the following subjects: the press and political institutions (e.g. the state, government, political parties, social movements, unions, interest groups, business), the politics of media coverage of social and cultural issues (e.g. race, language, health, environment, gender, nationhood, migration, labor), the dynamics and effects of political communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信