A meta-analytic comparison of scent effect between retailing and hospitality

IF 5.5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Lawrence Hoc Nang Fong, Erin Yirun Wang, Benigno Glenn R. Ricaforte, Rui Augusto Costa
{"title":"A meta-analytic comparison of scent effect between retailing and hospitality","authors":"Lawrence Hoc Nang Fong, Erin Yirun Wang, Benigno Glenn R. Ricaforte, Rui Augusto Costa","doi":"10.1108/ijrdm-08-2023-0508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This meta-analysis aims to examine and compare the pleasant ambient scent effects on consumers’ affective, cognitive and behavioural responses in the retail and hospitality sectors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>55 articles, including 102 effect sizes, are collected from electronic databases and search engines. The effect of pleasant ambient scents on consumer responses is examined using meta-regression analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results show a positive effect of pleasant ambient scent on all responses in both sectors, while the effects on cognitive and behavioural responses are stronger in hospitality than retailing. Moreover, the scent effects in hospitality research vary with method aspects, including sampling frame, research design, setting and location.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The findings provide theoretical insights on the sensory tangibilization of experience and methodological insights on designing scent research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The stronger effect of pleasant ambient scents on cognitive and behavioural responses in a hospitality environment signals that contextual differences should not be neglected. Moreover, hospitality researchers need to stay vigilant to the methodological influence on the findings about scent effects. These findings enrich the sensory marketing literature, in which contextual comparison is scarce.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51402,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-08-2023-0508","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This meta-analysis aims to examine and compare the pleasant ambient scent effects on consumers’ affective, cognitive and behavioural responses in the retail and hospitality sectors.

Design/methodology/approach

55 articles, including 102 effect sizes, are collected from electronic databases and search engines. The effect of pleasant ambient scents on consumer responses is examined using meta-regression analysis.

Findings

The results show a positive effect of pleasant ambient scent on all responses in both sectors, while the effects on cognitive and behavioural responses are stronger in hospitality than retailing. Moreover, the scent effects in hospitality research vary with method aspects, including sampling frame, research design, setting and location.

Research limitations/implications

The findings provide theoretical insights on the sensory tangibilization of experience and methodological insights on designing scent research.

Originality/value

The stronger effect of pleasant ambient scents on cognitive and behavioural responses in a hospitality environment signals that contextual differences should not be neglected. Moreover, hospitality researchers need to stay vigilant to the methodological influence on the findings about scent effects. These findings enrich the sensory marketing literature, in which contextual comparison is scarce.

零售业和酒店业香味效果的元分析比较
目的 本荟萃分析旨在研究和比较宜人的环境香味对零售业和酒店业消费者的情感、认知和行为反应的影响。研究结果表明,怡人的环境香味对两个行业消费者的所有反应都有积极影响,而对认知和行为反应的影响在酒店业要强于零售业。此外,酒店业研究中的香味效应因方法而异,包括抽样框架、研究设计、环境和地点。研究局限/意义研究结果为体验的感官切分提供了理论启示,并为设计香味研究提供了方法论启示。原创性/价值在酒店业环境中,宜人的环境香味对认知和行为反应的影响更大,这表明不应忽视环境差异。此外,酒店业研究人员需要警惕方法论对香味效应研究结果的影响。这些研究结果丰富了感官营销文献,而在感官营销文献中,情境比较还很少见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The competitive retail sector is under pressure to provide efficient services to hold its share of the market. As consumers demand higher levels of service and supply, they are simutaneously wooed by other alternatives like mail order and out of-town-shopping. The International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management provides a link between production and consumer, and by understanding their relationship it allows retail personnel to study operations practice in other organizations, and to compare methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信