Stratospheric Gravity Waves Impact on Infrasound Transmission Losses Across the International Monitoring System

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
C. Listowski, C. C. Stephan, A. Le Pichon, A. Hauchecorne, Y.-H. Kim, U. Achatz, G. Bölöni
{"title":"Stratospheric Gravity Waves Impact on Infrasound Transmission Losses Across the International Monitoring System","authors":"C. Listowski, C. C. Stephan, A. Le Pichon, A. Hauchecorne, Y.-H. Kim, U. Achatz, G. Bölöni","doi":"10.1007/s00024-024-03467-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The international monitoring system (IMS) has been put in place to monitor compliance with the comprehensive nuclear-test-ban treaty (CTBT). Its infrasound component, dedicated to the monitoring of atmospheric events, gives also room to civil applications (e.g. monitoring of volcanic eruptions, meteorites, severe weather). Infrasound detection capabilities are largely determined by the state of the middle atmosphere. This requires an accurate knowledge of the atmospheric processes at play. More particularly internal gravity waves (GW) pose a challenge to atmospheric modelling because of unresolved processes. Using high-resolution simulation outputs over winter 2020 (20 January–1 March) we present a method to assess the impact of GW on infrasound surface transmission losses across the IMS. We validate the method by comparing simulated GW perturbations to GW lidar observations at Observatoire de Haute-Provence in France, and satellite-based GW energy estimations globally. We perform propagation simulations using atmospheric specifications where GW are filtered out and kept in, respectively. We demonstrate that the largest impact of GW across the IMS is not where GW activity is the largest, but rather where GW activity combines with infrasound waveguides not firmly set in a given direction. In northern winter, the largest variations of transmission losses at 1 Hz due to GW occur in the southern (summer) hemisphere in the direction of the main guide (westward propagation), with average values ranging between 10 and 25 dB in the first shadow zone. It corresponds to an average signal amplification of at least a factor 5 to 15, while this amplification is around 2 to 5 for the main guide in the northern winter hemisphere (eastward propagation).</p>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-024-03467-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The international monitoring system (IMS) has been put in place to monitor compliance with the comprehensive nuclear-test-ban treaty (CTBT). Its infrasound component, dedicated to the monitoring of atmospheric events, gives also room to civil applications (e.g. monitoring of volcanic eruptions, meteorites, severe weather). Infrasound detection capabilities are largely determined by the state of the middle atmosphere. This requires an accurate knowledge of the atmospheric processes at play. More particularly internal gravity waves (GW) pose a challenge to atmospheric modelling because of unresolved processes. Using high-resolution simulation outputs over winter 2020 (20 January–1 March) we present a method to assess the impact of GW on infrasound surface transmission losses across the IMS. We validate the method by comparing simulated GW perturbations to GW lidar observations at Observatoire de Haute-Provence in France, and satellite-based GW energy estimations globally. We perform propagation simulations using atmospheric specifications where GW are filtered out and kept in, respectively. We demonstrate that the largest impact of GW across the IMS is not where GW activity is the largest, but rather where GW activity combines with infrasound waveguides not firmly set in a given direction. In northern winter, the largest variations of transmission losses at 1 Hz due to GW occur in the southern (summer) hemisphere in the direction of the main guide (westward propagation), with average values ranging between 10 and 25 dB in the first shadow zone. It corresponds to an average signal amplification of at least a factor 5 to 15, while this amplification is around 2 to 5 for the main guide in the northern winter hemisphere (eastward propagation).

Abstract Image

平流层重力波对整个国际监测系统次声波传输损耗的影响
国际监测系统(IMS)的建立是为了监测全面禁止核试验条约(CTBT)的遵守情况。该系统的次声部分专门用于监测大气事件,也可用于民用(如监测火山爆发、陨石、恶劣天气)。次声探测能力在很大程度上取决于中层大气的状态。这就需要准确了解大气的变化过程。尤其是内部重力波(GW),由于其过程尚未解决,对大气建模构成了挑战。利用 2020 年冬季(1 月 20 日至 3 月 1 日)的高分辨率模拟输出,我们提出了一种方法来评估内重力波对中层大气次声表面传输损失的影响。我们将模拟的全球大气扰动与法国上普罗旺斯天文台的全球大气扰动激光雷达观测结果以及基于卫星的全球大气扰动能量估算结果进行了比较,从而验证了该方法的有效性。我们使用大气规范进行了传播模拟,其中分别滤除和保留了全球瓦。我们证明,全球瓦对整个国际监测系统的最大影响并不是在全球瓦活动量最大的地方,而是在全球瓦活动量与次声波导结合在一起,而次声波导没有牢固地设置在特定方向上的地方。在北方的冬季,全球瓦导致的 1 赫兹传输损耗的最大变化发生在南半球(夏季)的主导波方向(向西传播),在第一阴影区的平均值在 10 到 25 dB 之间。这相当于平均信号放大了至少 5 到 15 倍,而在北半球冬季(向东传播)的主向导方向,信号放大率约为 2 到 5 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
pure and applied geophysics
pure and applied geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
240
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys. Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信