The European Organisation of External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM) Statement: guidelines for publishing about interlaboratory comparison studies (PubILC)

IF 6.6 2区医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY

Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1080/10408363.2024.2335202

Christoph Buchta, Gro Gidske, Gitte M. Henriksen, Tony Badrick, on behalf of the European Organisation of External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM)

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data and results from interlaboratory comparison (ILC) studies, external quality assessment (EQA) and proficiency testing (PT) activities are important and valuable contributions both to the furthe...

查看原文本刊更多论文

欧洲实验室医学外部质量保证提供者组织（EQALM）声明：实验室间比对研究（PubILC）发布指南

实验室间比对（ILC）研究、外部质量评估（EQA）和能力验证（PT）活动的数据和结果对于进一步提高实验室的能力和质量都具有重要而宝贵的贡献。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences 医学-医学实验技术

CiteScore

20.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.