Numerical study on bearing capacity of geocell-reinforced strip footings resting on slopes

IF 1.827 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Mohammad Hossein Vahedi, Mohammad Reza Arvin, Jim Shiau
{"title":"Numerical study on bearing capacity of geocell-reinforced strip footings resting on slopes","authors":"Mohammad Hossein Vahedi,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Arvin,&nbsp;Jim Shiau","doi":"10.1007/s12517-024-11958-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most research studies on the behavior of footings on geocell-reinforced slopes were conducted using experimental model tests on small-scale slopes. Very few studies can be found in relation to 3D analyses using detailed geocell structures. It is, therefore, the aim of the present study to investigate this problem by using a 3D finite element analysis. The study begins with verifying the accuracy of the applied finite element method using the results of the experimental model tests on the unreinforced and geocell-reinforced footings on slopes. It continues with studying the effects of main design factors such as the slope angle (<i>β</i>), the depth of the geocell mattress (<i>u</i>), the soil internal friction angle (<i>ϕ</i>), and the footing setback (<i>a</i>) on the bearing capacity of the geocell-reinforced footings. Numerical results suggest that an increase in soil internal friction angle and a decrease in slope angle would both enhance the bearing capacity of unreinforced and reinforced footings. The geocell reinforcement proves to be more effective in improving the bearing capacity of steeper slopes with small friction angles. In addition, the optimum depth of the geocell placement was found to be 0.1 times the footing width (0.1<i>B</i>) regardless of the <i>β</i> and<i> ϕ</i>. Irrespective of the <i>β</i>, the optimum footing setback ratio (<i>a/B</i>) was obtained at 0.5. As <i>a/B</i> ˃ 2, the effect on bearing capacity vanishes. At a constant footing setback ratio (<i>a/B</i> &lt; 2), the use of geocell reinforcement is more effective for steeper slopes. The findings in this numerical study are of practical significance to the geotechnical engineering community.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":476,"journal":{"name":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8270,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arabian Journal of Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12517-024-11958-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most research studies on the behavior of footings on geocell-reinforced slopes were conducted using experimental model tests on small-scale slopes. Very few studies can be found in relation to 3D analyses using detailed geocell structures. It is, therefore, the aim of the present study to investigate this problem by using a 3D finite element analysis. The study begins with verifying the accuracy of the applied finite element method using the results of the experimental model tests on the unreinforced and geocell-reinforced footings on slopes. It continues with studying the effects of main design factors such as the slope angle (β), the depth of the geocell mattress (u), the soil internal friction angle (ϕ), and the footing setback (a) on the bearing capacity of the geocell-reinforced footings. Numerical results suggest that an increase in soil internal friction angle and a decrease in slope angle would both enhance the bearing capacity of unreinforced and reinforced footings. The geocell reinforcement proves to be more effective in improving the bearing capacity of steeper slopes with small friction angles. In addition, the optimum depth of the geocell placement was found to be 0.1 times the footing width (0.1B) regardless of the β and ϕ. Irrespective of the β, the optimum footing setback ratio (a/B) was obtained at 0.5. As a/B ˃ 2, the effect on bearing capacity vanishes. At a constant footing setback ratio (a/B < 2), the use of geocell reinforcement is more effective for steeper slopes. The findings in this numerical study are of practical significance to the geotechnical engineering community.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

斜坡上土工格室加固条形基脚承载力的数值研究
关于土工格室加固斜坡上基脚行为的大多数研究都是在小规模斜坡上通过实验模型试验进行的。与使用详细土工格室结构进行三维分析有关的研究很少。因此,本研究旨在通过三维有限元分析来研究这一问题。研究首先利用斜坡上未加固和土工格室加固基脚的实验模型试验结果来验证所应用的有限元方法的准确性。接着,研究了坡角(β)、土工格室褥垫深度(u)、土壤内摩擦角(j)和坡脚后移(a)等主要设计因素对土工格室加固坡脚承载力的影响。数值结果表明,土壤内摩擦角的增大和坡角的减小都会提高未加固和加固基脚的承载能力。事实证明,土工格室加固在提高摩擦角较小的陡坡的承载能力方面更为有效。此外,还发现土工格室的最佳放置深度为基脚宽度的 0.1 倍(0.1B),与 β 和 ϕ 无关。与 β 无关,最佳基脚后退比(a/B)为 0.5。当 a/B ˃ 2 时,对承载力的影响消失。在恒定的坡脚后退比(a/B <2)下,使用土工格室加固对较陡的斜坡更为有效。这项数值研究的结果对岩土工程界具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
Arabian Journal of Geosciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1587
审稿时长
6.7 months
期刊介绍: The Arabian Journal of Geosciences is the official journal of the Saudi Society for Geosciences and publishes peer-reviewed original and review articles on the entire range of Earth Science themes, focused on, but not limited to, those that have regional significance to the Middle East and the Euro-Mediterranean Zone. Key topics therefore include; geology, hydrogeology, earth system science, petroleum sciences, geophysics, seismology and crustal structures, tectonics, sedimentology, palaeontology, metamorphic and igneous petrology, natural hazards, environmental sciences and sustainable development, geoarchaeology, geomorphology, paleo-environment studies, oceanography, atmospheric sciences, GIS and remote sensing, geodesy, mineralogy, volcanology, geochemistry and metallogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信