Wellbeing does not predict change in parenting behaviours among mothers of young children at elevated likelihood of autism

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Melinda Madarevic, Karla Van Leeuwen, Petra Warreyn, Lotte van Esch, Floor Moerman, Julie Segers, Maurits Masselink, Herbert Roeyers, Ilse Noens
{"title":"Wellbeing does not predict change in parenting behaviours among mothers of young children at elevated likelihood of autism","authors":"Melinda Madarevic, Karla Van Leeuwen, Petra Warreyn, Lotte van Esch, Floor Moerman, Julie Segers, Maurits Masselink, Herbert Roeyers, Ilse Noens","doi":"10.1007/s10826-024-02826-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Previous research has generally found lower wellbeing levels among parents of autistic children that were related to fewer positive and more negative parenting behaviours. However, these relationships have not yet been studied before a formal autism diagnosis is given. The present study investigates wellbeing (including positive mood, vitality, and general interest) and its relationships with a range of parenting behaviours among two groups of mothers with children at elevated likelihood (EL) of autism: mothers of younger siblings of children on the autism spectrum (‘siblings’; <i>n</i> = 81) and very or extremely prematurely born children (‘preterms’; <i>n</i> = 40). Growth curves were modelled to investigate whether wellbeing and EL group were associated with (change in) reported parenting behaviours between 10 and 24 months of child’s age. As expected, we found more stability than change in parenting behaviours, and more similarities than group differences in parenting behaviours and wellbeing. Mothers generally reported more disciplinary behaviours when their child grew older, in line with general population findings. Initial levels of supportive behaviours were equally high among mothers of siblings and preterms, but only mothers of preterms reported an increase over time. Wellbeing levels were largely comparable to those of a matched subsample from the general population, contradicting previous findings. Contrary to our hypotheses, wellbeing was not associated with fewer positive or more negative parenting behaviours. This is encouraging, as all children benefit from supportive and responsive behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":48362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child and Family Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child and Family Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-024-02826-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has generally found lower wellbeing levels among parents of autistic children that were related to fewer positive and more negative parenting behaviours. However, these relationships have not yet been studied before a formal autism diagnosis is given. The present study investigates wellbeing (including positive mood, vitality, and general interest) and its relationships with a range of parenting behaviours among two groups of mothers with children at elevated likelihood (EL) of autism: mothers of younger siblings of children on the autism spectrum (‘siblings’; n = 81) and very or extremely prematurely born children (‘preterms’; n = 40). Growth curves were modelled to investigate whether wellbeing and EL group were associated with (change in) reported parenting behaviours between 10 and 24 months of child’s age. As expected, we found more stability than change in parenting behaviours, and more similarities than group differences in parenting behaviours and wellbeing. Mothers generally reported more disciplinary behaviours when their child grew older, in line with general population findings. Initial levels of supportive behaviours were equally high among mothers of siblings and preterms, but only mothers of preterms reported an increase over time. Wellbeing levels were largely comparable to those of a matched subsample from the general population, contradicting previous findings. Contrary to our hypotheses, wellbeing was not associated with fewer positive or more negative parenting behaviours. This is encouraging, as all children benefit from supportive and responsive behaviours.

Abstract Image

幸福感并不能预测自闭症儿童母亲养育行为的变化
以往的研究普遍发现,自闭症儿童家长的幸福感水平较低,这与较少积极和较多消极的养育行为有关。然而,这些关系尚未在正式诊断自闭症之前进行过研究。本研究调查了两组有自闭症儿童的母亲的幸福感(包括积极情绪、活力和一般兴趣)及其与一系列养育行为的关系:自闭症谱系中儿童的弟弟妹妹("弟弟妹妹";n = 81)和极早产或极早产儿("早产儿";n = 40)的母亲。我们对成长曲线进行了建模,以研究福利和 EL 组别是否与儿童 10 个月至 24 个月期间所报告的养育行为(变化)有关。不出所料,我们发现育儿行为的稳定性多于变化性,育儿行为和幸福感的相似性多于群体差异。随着孩子年龄的增长,母亲们普遍报告了更多的管教行为,这与一般人群的调查结果一致。有兄弟姐妹和早产儿的母亲最初的支持行为水平同样高,但只有早产儿的母亲报告说随着时间的推移支持行为水平有所提高。幸福感水平在很大程度上与来自普通人群的匹配子样本的幸福感水平相当,这与之前的研究结果相矛盾。与我们的假设相反,幸福感与正面或负面育儿行为的减少无关。这是令人鼓舞的,因为所有儿童都能从支持性和回应性的行为中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: Journal of Child and Family Studies (JCFS) international, peer-reviewed forum for topical issues pertaining to the behavioral health and well-being of children, adolescents, and their families. Interdisciplinary and ecological in approach, the journal focuses on individual, family, and community contexts that influence child, youth, and family well-being and translates research results into practical applications for providers, program implementers, and policymakers. Original papers address applied and translational research, program evaluation, service delivery, and policy matters that affect child, youth, and family well-being. Topic areas include but are not limited to: enhancing child, youth/young adult, parent, caregiver, and/or family functioning; prevention and intervention related to social, emotional, or behavioral functioning in children, youth, and families; cumulative effects of risk and protective factors on behavioral health, development, and well-being; the effects both of exposure to adverse childhood events and assets/protective factors; child abuse and neglect, housing instability and homelessness, and related ecological factors influencing child and family outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信