Comparison of internal evaluation criteria in hierarchical clustering of categorical data

IF 1.4 4区 计算机科学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Zdenek Sulc, Jaroslav Hornicek, Hana Rezankova, Jana Cibulkova
{"title":"Comparison of internal evaluation criteria in hierarchical clustering of categorical data","authors":"Zdenek Sulc, Jaroslav Hornicek, Hana Rezankova, Jana Cibulkova","doi":"10.1007/s11634-024-00592-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The paper discusses eleven internal evaluation criteria that can be used in the area of hierarchical clustering of categorical data. The criteria are divided into two distinct groups based on how they treat the cluster quality: variability- and distance-based. The paper follows three main aims. The first one is to compare the examined criteria regarding their mutual similarity and dependence on the clustered datasets’ properties and the used similarity measures. The second one is to analyze the relationships between internal and external cluster evaluation to determine how well the internal criteria can recognize the original number of clusters in datasets and to what extent they provide comparable results to the external criteria. The third aim is to propose two new variability-based internal evaluation criteria. In the experiment, 81 types of generated datasets with controlled properties are used. The results show which internal criteria can be recommended for specific tasks, such as judging the cluster quality or the optimal number of clusters determination.</p>","PeriodicalId":49270,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-024-00592-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper discusses eleven internal evaluation criteria that can be used in the area of hierarchical clustering of categorical data. The criteria are divided into two distinct groups based on how they treat the cluster quality: variability- and distance-based. The paper follows three main aims. The first one is to compare the examined criteria regarding their mutual similarity and dependence on the clustered datasets’ properties and the used similarity measures. The second one is to analyze the relationships between internal and external cluster evaluation to determine how well the internal criteria can recognize the original number of clusters in datasets and to what extent they provide comparable results to the external criteria. The third aim is to propose two new variability-based internal evaluation criteria. In the experiment, 81 types of generated datasets with controlled properties are used. The results show which internal criteria can be recommended for specific tasks, such as judging the cluster quality or the optimal number of clusters determination.

Abstract Image

分类数据分层聚类的内部评价标准比较
本文讨论了可用于分类数据分层聚类领域的十一项内部评估标准。这些标准根据其处理聚类质量的方式分为两组:基于变异性的标准和基于距离的标准。本文有三个主要目的。第一个目的是比较所研究的标准在聚类数据集属性和所使用的相似性度量方面的相互相似性和依赖性。第二个目的是分析内部聚类评价和外部聚类评价之间的关系,以确定内部标准能在多大程度上识别数据集中的原始聚类数量,以及它们能在多大程度上提供与外部标准相当的结果。第三个目的是提出两个新的基于可变性的内部评价标准。在实验中,使用了 81 种具有可控属性的生成数据集。实验结果表明,哪些内部标准可推荐用于特定任务,如判断聚类质量或确定最佳聚类数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal Advances in Data Analysis and Classification (ADAC) is designed as a forum for high standard publications on research and applications concerning the extraction of knowable aspects from many types of data. It publishes articles on such topics as structural, quantitative, or statistical approaches for the analysis of data; advances in classification, clustering, and pattern recognition methods; strategies for modeling complex data and mining large data sets; methods for the extraction of knowledge from data, and applications of advanced methods in specific domains of practice. Articles illustrate how new domain-specific knowledge can be made available from data by skillful use of data analysis methods. The journal also publishes survey papers that outline, and illuminate the basic ideas and techniques of special approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信