Adverse impacts in residential aged care facilities: The resident perspective

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Bella St Clair, Amy Nguyen, Mikaela Jorgensen, Andrew Georgiou
{"title":"Adverse impacts in residential aged care facilities: The resident perspective","authors":"Bella St Clair,&nbsp;Amy Nguyen,&nbsp;Mikaela Jorgensen,&nbsp;Andrew Georgiou","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Inclusion of consumer perspectives is a key component to person-centred health-care approaches. While current residential aged care systems focus on recording adverse events to meet the requirements of regulatory reporting, little is known about the views of residents. The aim of this research was to explore residents' responses on the types of incidents that have an adverse impact on them and how they are affected by these incidents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study used a qualitative, inductive approach to derive themes from interviews with 20 permanent residents of aged care facilities in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four main themes surrounding adverse incidents emerged: (i) social relationships and the adverse impacts of lack of meaningful interactions, (ii) adjustment to life in the residential aged care facility and the loss of residents' former life and self-determination, (iii) the impact of COVID-19 lockdowns which meant that residents were not able to go out or interact with others and (iv) acceptance, resignation and resilience in coping with adverse incidents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This research highlights the difference between health-care definition, used for incident management reporting and quality indicators, and the way residents respond when asked to describe an incident that has affected them. Resident responses discuss situations having an adverse effect on them in contrast to the way adverse events and incidents are reported and monitored. The findings suggest that within adverse event and incident management systems and resident governance systems, there is scope for incorporating periods of transitions and well-being measures that capture elements that matter to older people.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":"43 3","pages":"581-590"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajag.13306","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajag.13306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Inclusion of consumer perspectives is a key component to person-centred health-care approaches. While current residential aged care systems focus on recording adverse events to meet the requirements of regulatory reporting, little is known about the views of residents. The aim of this research was to explore residents' responses on the types of incidents that have an adverse impact on them and how they are affected by these incidents.

Methods

The study used a qualitative, inductive approach to derive themes from interviews with 20 permanent residents of aged care facilities in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory.

Results

Four main themes surrounding adverse incidents emerged: (i) social relationships and the adverse impacts of lack of meaningful interactions, (ii) adjustment to life in the residential aged care facility and the loss of residents' former life and self-determination, (iii) the impact of COVID-19 lockdowns which meant that residents were not able to go out or interact with others and (iv) acceptance, resignation and resilience in coping with adverse incidents.

Conclusions

This research highlights the difference between health-care definition, used for incident management reporting and quality indicators, and the way residents respond when asked to describe an incident that has affected them. Resident responses discuss situations having an adverse effect on them in contrast to the way adverse events and incidents are reported and monitored. The findings suggest that within adverse event and incident management systems and resident governance systems, there is scope for incorporating periods of transitions and well-being measures that capture elements that matter to older people.

Abstract Image

养老院中的不良影响:居民的观点
目标纳入消费者观点是以人为本的医疗保健方法的关键组成部分。虽然目前的安老院系统侧重于记录不良事件,以满足监管报告的要求,但对院友的看法却知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨住户对对其产生不良影响的事件类型的反应,以及他们如何受到这些事件的影响。研究方法本研究采用定性归纳法,从对新南威尔士州和澳大利亚首都领地 20 名养老机构长期住户的访谈中得出主题。结果围绕不良事件出现了四个主要的主题:(i) 社会关系以及缺乏有意义的互动所带来的不良影响;(ii) 适应老年护理机构的生活以及居民失去以往的生活和自决权;(iii) COVID-19 封锁的影响,这意味着居民无法外出或与他人交流;以及 (iv) 应对不良事件时的接受、顺从和适应能力。结论这项研究强调了用于事件管理报告和质量指标的医疗定义与居民在被要求描述对其产生影响的事件时的反应方式之间的差异。住院患者在回答中讨论了对他们产生不良影响的情况,这与不良事件和事故的报告和监控方式形成了鲜明对比。研究结果表明,在不良事件和事故管理系统以及居民管理系统中,可以纳入过渡时期和福利措施,以捕捉对老年人重要的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信