Gender identity importance in cisgender and gender diverse adolescents in the US and Canada

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Natalie M. Wittlin, Natalie M. Gallagher, Kristina R. Olson
{"title":"Gender identity importance in cisgender and gender diverse adolescents in the US and Canada","authors":"Natalie M. Wittlin, Natalie M. Gallagher, Kristina R. Olson","doi":"10.1111/bjdp.12485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transgender adolescents often categorize themselves in the same way that cisgender adolescents do—that is, as girls/women and boys/men. Potential differences in the extent to which these self‐categorizations matter to transgender and cisgender adolescents, however, have yet to be explored, as has the relative importance transgender adolescents place on their gender compared to their transgender self‐categorization. In the current study, we explored self‐reported identity importance in a sample of 392 primarily White (70%) and multiracial/ethnic (20%) 12–18‐year‐old (<jats:italic>M</jats:italic> = 15.02) binary transgender (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 130), binary cisgender (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 236), and nonbinary (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 26) adolescents in the United States and Canada. Results revealed that binary transgender adolescents considered their gender self‐categorization to be more important to them than both binary cisgender and nonbinary adolescents did. Most binary transgender adolescents rated their gender self‐categorization as maximally important to them. Additionally, transgender adolescents considered their gender self‐categorization to be more important to them than their transgender self‐categorization (that is, their identification with the label “transgender”). These findings demonstrate that the identities that are often denied to binary transgender adolescents may be the very identities that are most important to them. Results also suggest that gender diverse adolescents with different gender identities may differ in the importance they place on these identities.","PeriodicalId":51418,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Developmental Psychology","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12485","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transgender adolescents often categorize themselves in the same way that cisgender adolescents do—that is, as girls/women and boys/men. Potential differences in the extent to which these self‐categorizations matter to transgender and cisgender adolescents, however, have yet to be explored, as has the relative importance transgender adolescents place on their gender compared to their transgender self‐categorization. In the current study, we explored self‐reported identity importance in a sample of 392 primarily White (70%) and multiracial/ethnic (20%) 12–18‐year‐old (M = 15.02) binary transgender (n = 130), binary cisgender (n = 236), and nonbinary (n = 26) adolescents in the United States and Canada. Results revealed that binary transgender adolescents considered their gender self‐categorization to be more important to them than both binary cisgender and nonbinary adolescents did. Most binary transgender adolescents rated their gender self‐categorization as maximally important to them. Additionally, transgender adolescents considered their gender self‐categorization to be more important to them than their transgender self‐categorization (that is, their identification with the label “transgender”). These findings demonstrate that the identities that are often denied to binary transgender adolescents may be the very identities that are most important to them. Results also suggest that gender diverse adolescents with different gender identities may differ in the importance they place on these identities.
美国和加拿大同性和异性青少年性别认同的重要性
变性青少年通常会以与同性青少年相同的方式对自己进行分类,即女孩/女人和男孩/男人。然而,这些自我分类对跨性别青少年和顺性别青少年的重要程度的潜在差异,以及跨性别青少年对其性别的相对重视程度与他们的跨性别自我分类相比,还有待探索。在本研究中,我们对美国和加拿大 392 名主要为白人(70%)和多种族/族裔(20%)的 12-18 岁(中=15.02)二元跨性别(n = 130)、二元顺性别(n = 236)和非二元(n = 26)青少年的自我报告身份重要性进行了探讨。结果显示,二元变性青少年比二元顺性青少年和非二元青少年更重视性别自我分类。大多数二元变性青少年认为他们的性别自我分类对他们来说是最重要的。此外,变性青少年认为他们的性别自我分类比他们的变性自我分类(即他们对 "变性 "标签的认同)更重要。这些结果表明,二元变性青少年经常被否认的身份可能正是对他们最重要的身份。研究结果还表明,具有不同性别认同的跨性别青少年对这些认同的重视程度可能有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Developmental Psychology
British Journal of Developmental Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Developmental Psychology publishes full-length, empirical, conceptual, review and discussion papers, as well as brief reports, in all of the following areas: - motor, perceptual, cognitive, social and emotional development in infancy; - social, emotional and personality development in childhood, adolescence and adulthood; - cognitive and socio-cognitive development in childhood, adolescence and adulthood, including the development of language, mathematics, theory of mind, drawings, spatial cognition, biological and societal understanding; - atypical development, including developmental disorders, learning difficulties/disabilities and sensory impairments;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信