The effect of a STEM integrated curriculum on design thinking dispositions in middle school students

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Dina Thomason, Pei-Ling Hsu
{"title":"The effect of a STEM integrated curriculum on design thinking dispositions in middle school students","authors":"Dina Thomason, Pei-Ling Hsu","doi":"10.1007/s10798-024-09894-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>STEM, the integration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics subjects is a popular topic as schools grapple with how to best prepare students for an ever-evolving society. As societal and technological challenges emerge, design thinking has been lauded as a method to enable people to help tackle those challenges. The steps of the design thinking process, <i>empathize, define, ideate, prototype</i> and <i>test</i> align with engineering design and can be used as a problem-solving method in classrooms to help promote creativity, critical thinking, and collaboration. The purpose of this explanatory sequential mixed methods study was to better understand if a STEM integrated curriculum helps promote design thinking in middle schoolers. The study compared two middle school groups, one that uses an integrated STEM curriculum and one that does not. Quantitative data was collected using the design thinking disposition survey through pre and post testing. Qualitative data was collected through free response questions and student and teacher interviews. There was no difference found in the change of design thinking dispositions between students at the two schools, however both groups scored lowest on the design thinking disposition of <i>prototype.</i> Free response questions showed that students at the STEM integrated school perceived an increased ability to design solutions to problems. Student and teacher interviews highlighted benefits of using a STEM integrated curriculum including providing collaborative opportunities to solve hands-on, open-ended problems. How a STEM integrated curriculum can develop design thinking should continue to be examined.</p>","PeriodicalId":50286,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology and Design Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology and Design Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09894-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

STEM, the integration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics subjects is a popular topic as schools grapple with how to best prepare students for an ever-evolving society. As societal and technological challenges emerge, design thinking has been lauded as a method to enable people to help tackle those challenges. The steps of the design thinking process, empathize, define, ideate, prototype and test align with engineering design and can be used as a problem-solving method in classrooms to help promote creativity, critical thinking, and collaboration. The purpose of this explanatory sequential mixed methods study was to better understand if a STEM integrated curriculum helps promote design thinking in middle schoolers. The study compared two middle school groups, one that uses an integrated STEM curriculum and one that does not. Quantitative data was collected using the design thinking disposition survey through pre and post testing. Qualitative data was collected through free response questions and student and teacher interviews. There was no difference found in the change of design thinking dispositions between students at the two schools, however both groups scored lowest on the design thinking disposition of prototype. Free response questions showed that students at the STEM integrated school perceived an increased ability to design solutions to problems. Student and teacher interviews highlighted benefits of using a STEM integrated curriculum including providing collaborative opportunities to solve hands-on, open-ended problems. How a STEM integrated curriculum can develop design thinking should continue to be examined.

Abstract Image

STEM 综合课程对中学生设计思维能力的影响
STEM,即科学、技术、工程和数学学科的整合,是一个热门话题,因为学校正在努力研究如何让学生为不断发展的社会做好最充分的准备。随着社会和技术挑战的出现,设计思维作为一种使人们能够帮助应对这些挑战的方法而备受推崇。设计思维过程中的 "移情、定义、构思、原型和测试 "等步骤与工程设计相吻合,可在课堂上用作解决问题的方法,以帮助促进创造力、批判性思维和协作。这项解释性顺序混合方法研究旨在更好地了解 STEM 综合课程是否有助于促进初中生的设计思维。研究比较了两个中学小组,一个使用 STEM 综合课程,另一个没有使用。通过前后测试,使用设计思维处置调查收集定量数据。定性数据是通过自由回答问题以及学生和教师访谈收集的。两所学校的学生在设计思维倾向的变化上没有差异,但两组学生在原型设计思维倾向上的得分都最低。自由回答问题显示,STEM 综合学校的学生认为设计问题解决方案的能力有所提高。对学生和教师的访谈强调了使用 STEM 综合课程的好处,包括提供合作机会来解决实践性、开放性问题。应继续研究 STEM 综合课程如何培养设计思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Technology and Design Education seeks to encourage research and scholarly writing about any aspect of technology and design education. Critical, review, and comparative studies are particularly prominent, as are contributions which draw upon other literatures, such as those derived from historical, philosophical, sociological or psychological studies of technology or design, in order to address issues of concern to technology and design education. One of the most significant developments of recent years has been the emergence of technology and design education as an integral part of general education in many parts of the world. Its distinctive curriculum features are technological literacy and capability and it highlights the importance of `knowledge in action'', of `doing'' as well as `understanding''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信