Striving to support the supporters: A mixed methods evaluation of the strive support groups for caregivers of individuals with an eating disorder

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Aviva Margaret Lefkovits, Genevieve Pepin, Andrea Phillipou, Sarah Giles, Jane Rowan, Isabel Krug
{"title":"Striving to support the supporters: A mixed methods evaluation of the strive support groups for caregivers of individuals with an eating disorder","authors":"Aviva Margaret Lefkovits,&nbsp;Genevieve Pepin,&nbsp;Andrea Phillipou,&nbsp;Sarah Giles,&nbsp;Jane Rowan,&nbsp;Isabel Krug","doi":"10.1002/erv.3090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This mixed-methods study evaluated a peer-led support group for ED caregivers; the Eating Disorders Families Australia <i>strive</i> support groups. Quantitatively, 110 past or current <i>strive</i> attendees completed an online survey assessing their own and their care recipients' demographic profiles, <i>strive's</i> impact on caregiving experiences, and caregivers' psychological distress, burden, caregiving skills and self-efficacy. Qualitative assessment comprised open-ended survey questions about caregivers' <i>strive</i> experiences, reinforced by in-depth focus group assessment of nine participants. Quantitative analyses revealed that participants felt more confident and supported, and less isolated in their caregiving since attending <i>strive</i>. Caregivers displayed mid-range psychological distress and caregiver burden, and moderate caregiver skills and self-efficacy. Qualitatively, the most helpful aspects of <i>strive</i> were the shared experience among participants, education, and support. The most difficult elements were emotional distress and overly dominant members. Reflections discussed the necessity of caregiver support and factors impacting <i>strive</i> attendance. Participants recommended resuming face-to-face contact and differentiating groups based on participant characteristics (e.g. care recipients' age/stage of illness). The current findings provide support for the importance and overall positive contribution of support groups led by caregivers, such as <i>strive</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":"32 5","pages":"880-897"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/erv.3090","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/erv.3090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This mixed-methods study evaluated a peer-led support group for ED caregivers; the Eating Disorders Families Australia strive support groups. Quantitatively, 110 past or current strive attendees completed an online survey assessing their own and their care recipients' demographic profiles, strive's impact on caregiving experiences, and caregivers' psychological distress, burden, caregiving skills and self-efficacy. Qualitative assessment comprised open-ended survey questions about caregivers' strive experiences, reinforced by in-depth focus group assessment of nine participants. Quantitative analyses revealed that participants felt more confident and supported, and less isolated in their caregiving since attending strive. Caregivers displayed mid-range psychological distress and caregiver burden, and moderate caregiver skills and self-efficacy. Qualitatively, the most helpful aspects of strive were the shared experience among participants, education, and support. The most difficult elements were emotional distress and overly dominant members. Reflections discussed the necessity of caregiver support and factors impacting strive attendance. Participants recommended resuming face-to-face contact and differentiating groups based on participant characteristics (e.g. care recipients' age/stage of illness). The current findings provide support for the importance and overall positive contribution of support groups led by caregivers, such as strive.

Abstract Image

努力支持支持者:以混合方法评估饮食失调患者照顾者的努力支持小组
这项混合方法研究评估了一个由同伴领导的 ED 护理人员支持小组,即澳大利亚饮食失调症家庭支持小组(Eating Disorders Families Australia strive support groups)。在定量方面,110 名曾经或目前参加过努力的人完成了一项在线调查,评估了他们自己及其护理对象的人口统计学特征、努力对护理经验的影响,以及护理者的心理困扰、负担、护理技能和自我效能。定性评估包括有关护理人员努力经验的开放式调查问题,并通过对九名参与者进行深入的焦点小组评估来加强。定量分析显示,参与者在参加努力之后,在护理工作中感到更有信心和支持,并减少了孤独感。护理人员的心理压力和护理负担处于中等水平,护理技能和自我效能处于中等水平。从定性角度看,参加努力最有帮助的方面是参与者之间的经验分享、教育和支持。最困难的因素是情绪困扰和过于强势的成员。反思讨论了照顾者支持的必要性和影响参加努力的因素。参与者建议恢复面对面的联系,并根据参与者的特点(如护理对象的年龄/疾病阶段)区分不同的小组。目前的研究结果证明了由照顾者领导的支持小组(如努力小组)的重要性和总体积极贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Eating Disorders Review
European Eating Disorders Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信