Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID)—Looking beyond the eating disorder lens?

IF 3.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Fiona Duffy, Emma Willmott, Emy Nimbley, Andrew Lawton, Helen Sharpe, Kyle Buchan, Karri Gillespie-Smith
{"title":"Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID)—Looking beyond the eating disorder lens?","authors":"Fiona Duffy,&nbsp;Emma Willmott,&nbsp;Emy Nimbley,&nbsp;Andrew Lawton,&nbsp;Helen Sharpe,&nbsp;Kyle Buchan,&nbsp;Karri Gillespie-Smith","doi":"10.1002/erv.3093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) was first included as a diagnostic category in 2013, and over the past 10 years has been adopted by the international eating disorder community. While greater awareness of these difficulties has increased identification, demand and enabled advocacy for clinical services, the heterogeneous nature of ARFID poses unique challenges for eating disorder clinicians and researchers. This commentary aims to reflect on some of these challenges, focussing specifically on the risk of viewing ARFID through an eating disorder lens. This includes potential biases in the literature as most recent research has been conducted in specialist child and adolescent eating disorder clinic settings, bringing in to question the generalisability of findings to the broad spectrum of individuals affected by ARFID. We also consider whether viewing ARFID predominantly through an eating disorder lens risks us as a field being blinkered to the range of effective skills our multi-disciplinary feeding colleagues may bring. There are opportunities that may come with the eating disorder field navigating treatment pathways for ARFID, including more joined up working with multi-disciplinary colleagues, the ability to transfer skills used in ARFID treatment to individuals with eating disorder presentations, and most notably an opportunity to provide more effective treatment and service pathways for individuals with ARFID and their families. However, these opportunities will only be realised if eating disorder clinicians and researchers step out of their current silos.</p>","PeriodicalId":48117,"journal":{"name":"European Eating Disorders Review","volume":"32 4","pages":"824-827"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/erv.3093","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Eating Disorders Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/erv.3093","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) was first included as a diagnostic category in 2013, and over the past 10 years has been adopted by the international eating disorder community. While greater awareness of these difficulties has increased identification, demand and enabled advocacy for clinical services, the heterogeneous nature of ARFID poses unique challenges for eating disorder clinicians and researchers. This commentary aims to reflect on some of these challenges, focussing specifically on the risk of viewing ARFID through an eating disorder lens. This includes potential biases in the literature as most recent research has been conducted in specialist child and adolescent eating disorder clinic settings, bringing in to question the generalisability of findings to the broad spectrum of individuals affected by ARFID. We also consider whether viewing ARFID predominantly through an eating disorder lens risks us as a field being blinkered to the range of effective skills our multi-disciplinary feeding colleagues may bring. There are opportunities that may come with the eating disorder field navigating treatment pathways for ARFID, including more joined up working with multi-disciplinary colleagues, the ability to transfer skills used in ARFID treatment to individuals with eating disorder presentations, and most notably an opportunity to provide more effective treatment and service pathways for individuals with ARFID and their families. However, these opportunities will only be realised if eating disorder clinicians and researchers step out of their current silos.

回避型限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)--超越饮食失调的视角?
回避型限制性食物摄入障碍(ARFID)于 2013 年首次被列为诊断类别,在过去 10 年中已被国际进食障碍界所采用。虽然对这些困难的进一步认识增加了对临床服务的识别、需求和宣传,但 ARFID 的异质性为进食障碍临床医生和研究人员带来了独特的挑战。本评论旨在反思其中的一些挑战,特别关注从饮食失调的角度看待 ARFID 的风险。这包括文献中可能存在的偏见,因为最近的大多数研究都是在儿童和青少年饮食失调症专科门诊环境中进行的,这就使研究结果是否能普遍适用于受 ARFID 影响的广泛人群成为疑问。我们还考虑到,如果主要从饮食失调的角度来看待 ARFID,那么作为一个领域,我们是否有可能对我们的多学科喂养同事可能带来的一系列有效技能视而不见。饮食失调领域在探索ARFID的治疗途径时可能会遇到一些机遇,包括与多学科同事进行更多的联合工作,能够将ARFID治疗中使用的技能传授给有饮食失调表现的个体,最值得注意的是,有机会为ARFID患者及其家庭提供更有效的治疗和服务途径。然而,只有当饮食失调症临床医生和研究人员走出目前的孤岛,这些机会才能实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Eating Disorders Review
European Eating Disorders Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
7.50%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: European Eating Disorders Review publishes authoritative and accessible articles, from all over the world, which review or report original research that has implications for the treatment and care of people with eating disorders, and articles which report innovations and experience in the clinical management of eating disorders. The journal focuses on implications for best practice in diagnosis and treatment. The journal also provides a forum for discussion of the causes and prevention of eating disorders, and related health policy. The aims of the journal are to offer a channel of communication between researchers, practitioners, administrators and policymakers who need to report and understand developments in the field of eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信