How karmic beliefs and beliefs in a just world interact to trigger consumer’s pro-environmental consumption behavior: does gender matter?

IF 2.3 Q3 BUSINESS
Cong Doanh Duong, Xuan Hau Doan, Thi Huyen Nguyen, Van Thanh Dao, Thi Phuong Thu Nguyen
{"title":"How karmic beliefs and beliefs in a just world interact to trigger consumer’s pro-environmental consumption behavior: does gender matter?","authors":"Cong Doanh Duong, Xuan Hau Doan, Thi Huyen Nguyen, Van Thanh Dao, Thi Phuong Thu Nguyen","doi":"10.1108/jabs-09-2023-0373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Little is known about how religious-related beliefs (i.e. karmic beliefs and beliefs in a just world) might affect consumers to engage in more environmentally friendly behavior. Drawing on the justice motive theory, this study aims to explore the individual, complementary, congruent and incongruent impacts of karmic beliefs and belief in a just world on consumers’ proenvironmental consumption.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A sample of 736 consumers was recruited by means of a mall-intercept survey in the most populus cities in Vietnam. An advanced technique – polynomial regression with response surface analysis – was used to test the hypothesized model, whereas the PROCESS macro approach was used to estimate indirect effects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings indicate that while karmic beliefs do not directly affect proenvironmental consumption, they can inspire environmentally friendly behaviors through belief in a just world. High levels of both beliefs enhance proenvironmental consumption, but imbalanced levels erode such behaviors. Importantly, the findings revealed gender differences concerning the role of religious beliefs in influencing proenvironmental consumption among male and female consumers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The findings of this study offered several theoretical and managerial implications for proenvironmental consumption.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The research provides new insights into how religious beliefs (karmic beliefs and belief in a just world) affect, interact, balance and imbalance with each other to trigger proenvironmental consumption. The research also contributes to the sustainable consumption literature by indicating the mediation roles of belief in a just world and proenvironmental consumption intention in the relationship between beliefs in karma and actual proenvironmental consumption behavior, as well as offering empirical evidence about the gender differences regarding these relationships.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46138,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asia Business Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asia Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jabs-09-2023-0373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Little is known about how religious-related beliefs (i.e. karmic beliefs and beliefs in a just world) might affect consumers to engage in more environmentally friendly behavior. Drawing on the justice motive theory, this study aims to explore the individual, complementary, congruent and incongruent impacts of karmic beliefs and belief in a just world on consumers’ proenvironmental consumption.

Design/methodology/approach

A sample of 736 consumers was recruited by means of a mall-intercept survey in the most populus cities in Vietnam. An advanced technique – polynomial regression with response surface analysis – was used to test the hypothesized model, whereas the PROCESS macro approach was used to estimate indirect effects.

Findings

The findings indicate that while karmic beliefs do not directly affect proenvironmental consumption, they can inspire environmentally friendly behaviors through belief in a just world. High levels of both beliefs enhance proenvironmental consumption, but imbalanced levels erode such behaviors. Importantly, the findings revealed gender differences concerning the role of religious beliefs in influencing proenvironmental consumption among male and female consumers.

Practical implications

The findings of this study offered several theoretical and managerial implications for proenvironmental consumption.

Originality/value

The research provides new insights into how religious beliefs (karmic beliefs and belief in a just world) affect, interact, balance and imbalance with each other to trigger proenvironmental consumption. The research also contributes to the sustainable consumption literature by indicating the mediation roles of belief in a just world and proenvironmental consumption intention in the relationship between beliefs in karma and actual proenvironmental consumption behavior, as well as offering empirical evidence about the gender differences regarding these relationships.

因果报应信念和对公正世界的信念如何相互作用,引发消费者的环保消费行为:性别是否重要?
目的 人们对与宗教有关的信仰(即因果报应信仰和对公正世界的信仰)如何影响消费者的环保行为知之甚少。本研究以正义动机理论为基础,旨在探讨因果报应信仰和正义世界信仰对消费者环保消费的个体影响、互补影响、一致影响和不一致影响。研究结果研究结果表明,虽然因果报应信念并不直接影响亲环境消费,但它可以通过对公正世界的信念激发亲环境行为。这两种信念的高水平都会促进亲环境消费,但不平衡的水平则会削弱这种行为。重要的是,研究结果揭示了宗教信仰在影响男性和女性消费者的亲环境消费方面的性别差异。原创性/价值这项研究为宗教信仰(因果报应信仰和对公正世界的信仰)如何相互影响、相互作用、平衡和失衡以引发亲环境消费提供了新的见解。研究还指出了在因果报应信仰与实际环保消费行为之间的关系中,对公正世界的信仰和环保消费意向所起的中介作用,并就这些关系中的性别差异提供了实证证据,从而为可持续消费文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信