Evaluating the Causal Structure of the Relationship Between Belonging and Academic Self-Efficacy in Community College: An Application of Direction Dependence Analysis

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Christopher D. Slaten, Wolfgang Wiedermann, Michael Steven Williams, Bini Sebastian
{"title":"Evaluating the Causal Structure of the Relationship Between Belonging and Academic Self-Efficacy in Community College: An Application of Direction Dependence Analysis","authors":"Christopher D. Slaten, Wolfgang Wiedermann, Michael Steven Williams, Bini Sebastian","doi":"10.1007/s10755-024-09707-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Student persistence and retention in community colleges concern scholars, policymakers, and academics in higher education at large. Previous literature suggests that a strong sense of belonging in higher education and at the institution the student is attending may be one significant factor that impacts persistence and retention. However, belonging on campus in community college settings is complex given the nature of open enrollment, lack of on-campus housing, employment status of most students, and the limited amount of time students stay at the institution. Furthermore, previous correlational studies linking a sense of belonging and academic outcomes leave scholars wondering about causation without the science to support the inquiries. Standard statistical methods of association do not allow scholars to draw causal conclusions. Direction dependence analysis (DDA) provides a new way of statistically examining the causal directionality of relationships between constructs. The current study introduces principles of direction dependence modeling and examines the causal direction of the relationship between belonging and academic self-efficacy in a large community college setting. DDA results suggest that there is evidence to suggest a causal relationship between belonging and academic self-efficacy, a strong indication that belonging causes academic motivation rather than the other way around. Implications for higher education research and potential limitations of DDA are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47065,"journal":{"name":"Innovative Higher Education","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovative Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09707-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Student persistence and retention in community colleges concern scholars, policymakers, and academics in higher education at large. Previous literature suggests that a strong sense of belonging in higher education and at the institution the student is attending may be one significant factor that impacts persistence and retention. However, belonging on campus in community college settings is complex given the nature of open enrollment, lack of on-campus housing, employment status of most students, and the limited amount of time students stay at the institution. Furthermore, previous correlational studies linking a sense of belonging and academic outcomes leave scholars wondering about causation without the science to support the inquiries. Standard statistical methods of association do not allow scholars to draw causal conclusions. Direction dependence analysis (DDA) provides a new way of statistically examining the causal directionality of relationships between constructs. The current study introduces principles of direction dependence modeling and examines the causal direction of the relationship between belonging and academic self-efficacy in a large community college setting. DDA results suggest that there is evidence to suggest a causal relationship between belonging and academic self-efficacy, a strong indication that belonging causes academic motivation rather than the other way around. Implications for higher education research and potential limitations of DDA are discussed.

Abstract Image

评估社区学院中归属感与学业自我效能感之间关系的因果结构:方向依赖分析法的应用
社区学院学生的继续就读和保留学籍问题引起了广大高等教育学者、政策制定者和学术界的关注。以往的文献表明,学生对高等教育和所就读院校的强烈归属感可能是影响学生继续就读和保留学籍的一个重要因素。然而,鉴于社区学院的开放式招生、缺乏校内宿舍、大多数学生的就业状况以及学生在校学习时间有限等特点,社区学院学生的校园归属感非常复杂。此外,以往将归属感与学业成绩联系起来的相关研究让学者们对因果关系产生了疑问,却没有科学依据来支持这些疑问。标准的关联统计方法无法让学者们得出因果结论。方向依存分析(Direction dependence analysis,DDA)提供了一种新的方法,可以从统计学的角度来检验构件之间关系的因果方向性。本研究介绍了方向依存模型的原理,并考察了大型社区学院中归属感与学业自我效能感之间关系的因果方向。DDA 结果表明,有证据表明归属感与学业自我效能感之间存在因果关系,这有力地说明了归属感会导致学业动力,而不是相反。本文讨论了 DDA 对高等教育研究的影响和潜在局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovative Higher Education
Innovative Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Innovative Higher Education is a refereed scholarly journal that strives to package fresh ideas in higher education in a straightforward and readable fashion. The four main purposes of Innovative Higher Education are: (1) to present descriptions and evaluations of current innovations and provocative new ideas with relevance for action beyond the immediate context in higher education; (2) to focus on the effect of such innovations on teaching and students; (3) to be open to diverse forms of scholarship and research methods by maintaining flexibility in the selection of topics deemed appropriate for the journal; and (4) to strike a balance between practice and theory by presenting manuscripts in a readable and scholarly manner to both faculty and administrators in the academic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信