Understanding and calculating household size, wealth, and inequality in the Maya Lowlands

IF 0.9 3区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Adrian S.Z. Chase, Amy E. Thompson, John P. Walden, Gary M. Feinman
{"title":"Understanding and calculating household size, wealth, and inequality in the Maya Lowlands","authors":"Adrian S.Z. Chase, Amy E. Thompson, John P. Walden, Gary M. Feinman","doi":"10.1017/s095653612300024x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inequality is present in all human societies, but building a robust understanding of how that inequality developed and persisted for centuries requires historical and archaeological data. Identifying the degree of inequality (or disparity) in ancient communities can be addressed through a variety of methods. One method becoming standard practice in archaeology evaluates inequality through quantitative analysis of robust settlement data. In this Compact Special Section, we assess household size as a potential reflection of wealth inequality among Classic period (<jats:sc>a.d.</jats:sc> 250–900) Maya settlements. First, we generate house-size data from both pedestrian and remotely sensed LiDAR surveys. Then we use those data to calculate Gini coefficients and Lorenz curves, which provide measures of variation. Gini coefficients range from 0 to 1, where 0 reflects perfect equality and 1 indicates perfect inequality, regardless of the actual values in the distribution. Both area (m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) and volume (m<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>) provide different, complementary metrics to investigate residential size as a metric for wealth inequality among Classic Maya Lowland settlements. Proposed mechanisms that generate inequality include the intergenerational transmission of wealth and differential access to resources; however, addressing these and other pathways for how inequality develops and persists, and how it was maintained in the past provides insight into similar processes of systemic inequality worldwide.","PeriodicalId":46480,"journal":{"name":"Ancient Mesoamerica","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ancient Mesoamerica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s095653612300024x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inequality is present in all human societies, but building a robust understanding of how that inequality developed and persisted for centuries requires historical and archaeological data. Identifying the degree of inequality (or disparity) in ancient communities can be addressed through a variety of methods. One method becoming standard practice in archaeology evaluates inequality through quantitative analysis of robust settlement data. In this Compact Special Section, we assess household size as a potential reflection of wealth inequality among Classic period (a.d. 250–900) Maya settlements. First, we generate house-size data from both pedestrian and remotely sensed LiDAR surveys. Then we use those data to calculate Gini coefficients and Lorenz curves, which provide measures of variation. Gini coefficients range from 0 to 1, where 0 reflects perfect equality and 1 indicates perfect inequality, regardless of the actual values in the distribution. Both area (m2) and volume (m3) provide different, complementary metrics to investigate residential size as a metric for wealth inequality among Classic Maya Lowland settlements. Proposed mechanisms that generate inequality include the intergenerational transmission of wealth and differential access to resources; however, addressing these and other pathways for how inequality develops and persists, and how it was maintained in the past provides insight into similar processes of systemic inequality worldwide.
了解和计算玛雅低地的家庭规模、财富和不平等现象
不平等存在于所有人类社会中,但要深入了解这种不平等是如何发展并持续数百年的,则需要历史和考古数据。确定古代社会的不平等(或差距)程度可以通过多种方法来解决。其中一种方法已成为考古学的标准做法,即通过对可靠的聚落数据进行定量分析来评估不平等程度。在本《契约》特辑中,我们将评估家庭规模,以此作为古典时期(公元 250-900 年)玛雅人聚居地财富不平等的潜在反映。首先,我们从行人和遥感激光雷达调查中生成房屋大小数据。然后,我们利用这些数据计算基尼系数和洛伦兹曲线,以衡量差异。基尼系数的范围从 0 到 1,其中 0 表示完全平等,1 表示完全不平等,与分布中的实际值无关。面积(平方米)和体积(立方米)提供了不同的、互补的衡量标准,以研究作为财富不平等衡量标准的经典玛雅低地聚落的住宅面积。拟议的不平等产生机制包括财富的代代相传和资源的不同获取途径;然而,解决这些问题以及不平等如何发展和持续的其他途径,以及不平等在过去是如何维持的问题,有助于深入了解全球系统性不平等的类似过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ancient Mesoamerica
Ancient Mesoamerica ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Ancient Mesoamerica is the international forum for the method, theory, substance and interpretation of Mesoamerican archaeology, art history and ethnohistory. The journal publishes papers chiefly concerned with the Pre-Columbian archaeology of the Mesoamerican region, but also features articles from other disciplines including ethnohistory, historical archaeology and ethnoarchaeology. Topics covered include the origins of agriculture, the economic base of city states and empires, political organisation from the Formative through the Early Colonial periods, the development and function of early writing, and the use of iconography to reconstruct ancient religious beliefs and practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信