Olivier Corbeil, Élizabeth Anderson, Laurent Béchard, Charles Desmeules, Maxime Huot-Lavoie, Lauryann Bachand, Sébastien Brodeur, Pierre-Hugues Carmichael, Christian Jacques, Marco Solmi, Isabelle Giroux, Michel Dorval, Marie-France Demers, Marc-André Roy
{"title":"Problem gambling in psychotic disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence","authors":"Olivier Corbeil, Élizabeth Anderson, Laurent Béchard, Charles Desmeules, Maxime Huot-Lavoie, Lauryann Bachand, Sébastien Brodeur, Pierre-Hugues Carmichael, Christian Jacques, Marco Solmi, Isabelle Giroux, Michel Dorval, Marie-France Demers, Marc-André Roy","doi":"10.1111/acps.13686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Problem gambling (PBG) is more common in people with mental health disorders, including substance use, bipolar, and personality disorders, than in the general population. Although individuals with psychotic disorders might be expected to be more vulnerable to PBG, fewer studies have focused on this comorbidity. The aim of this review was to estimate the prevalence of PBG in people with psychotic disorders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Medline (Ovid), EMBASE, PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of science, and ProQuest were searched on November 1, 2023, without language restrictions. Observational and experimental studies including individuals with psychotic disorders and reporting the prevalence of PBG were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal for systematic reviews of prevalence data. The pooled prevalence of PBG was calculated using a fixed effects generalized linear mixed model and presented through forest plots.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 1271 records screened, 12 studies (<i>n</i> = 3443) were included. The overall prevalence of PBG was 8.7% (95% CI = 7.8%–9.7%, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 69%). A lower prevalence was found in studies with a low risk of bias (5.6%; 95% CI = 4.4%–7.0%) compared with studies with a moderate risk of bias (10.4%; 95% CI = 9.2%–11.7%). Different methods used to assess PBG also contributed to the heterogeneity found.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This meta-analysis found substantial heterogeneity, partly due to the risk of bias of the included studies and a lack of uniformity in PBG assessment. Although more research is needed to identify those at increased risk for PBG, its relatively high prevalence warrants routine screening for gambling in clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":"149 6","pages":"445-457"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acps.13686","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acps.13686","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Problem gambling (PBG) is more common in people with mental health disorders, including substance use, bipolar, and personality disorders, than in the general population. Although individuals with psychotic disorders might be expected to be more vulnerable to PBG, fewer studies have focused on this comorbidity. The aim of this review was to estimate the prevalence of PBG in people with psychotic disorders.
Methods
Medline (Ovid), EMBASE, PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of science, and ProQuest were searched on November 1, 2023, without language restrictions. Observational and experimental studies including individuals with psychotic disorders and reporting the prevalence of PBG were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal for systematic reviews of prevalence data. The pooled prevalence of PBG was calculated using a fixed effects generalized linear mixed model and presented through forest plots.
Results
Of 1271 records screened, 12 studies (n = 3443) were included. The overall prevalence of PBG was 8.7% (95% CI = 7.8%–9.7%, I2 = 69%). A lower prevalence was found in studies with a low risk of bias (5.6%; 95% CI = 4.4%–7.0%) compared with studies with a moderate risk of bias (10.4%; 95% CI = 9.2%–11.7%). Different methods used to assess PBG also contributed to the heterogeneity found.
Conclusion
This meta-analysis found substantial heterogeneity, partly due to the risk of bias of the included studies and a lack of uniformity in PBG assessment. Although more research is needed to identify those at increased risk for PBG, its relatively high prevalence warrants routine screening for gambling in clinical practice.
期刊介绍：
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers.
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
