Impact of billing reforms on academic hospitalist physician and advanced practice provider collaboration: A qualitative study

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Sara Westergaard MD, MPH, Kasey Bowden MSN, FNP, AG-ACNP, Gopi J. Astik MD, MS, Greg Bowling MD, Angela Keniston PhD, MSPH, Anne Linker MD, Matthew Sakumoto MD, Natalie Schwatka PhD, Andrew Auerbach MD, Marisha Burden MD, MBA
{"title":"Impact of billing reforms on academic hospitalist physician and advanced practice provider collaboration: A qualitative study","authors":"Sara Westergaard MD, MPH,&nbsp;Kasey Bowden MSN, FNP, AG-ACNP,&nbsp;Gopi J. Astik MD, MS,&nbsp;Greg Bowling MD,&nbsp;Angela Keniston PhD, MSPH,&nbsp;Anne Linker MD,&nbsp;Matthew Sakumoto MD,&nbsp;Natalie Schwatka PhD,&nbsp;Andrew Auerbach MD,&nbsp;Marisha Burden MD, MBA","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Medicare previously announced plans for new billing reforms for inpatient visits that are shared by physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) whereby the clinician spending the most time on the patient visit would bill for the visit.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To understand how inpatient hospital medicine teams utilize APPs in patient care and how the proposed billing policies might impact future APP utilization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design, Setting and Participants</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted focus groups with hospitalist physicians, APPs, and other leaders from 21 academic hospitals across the United States. Utilizing rapid qualitative methods, focus groups were analyzed using a mixed inductive and deductive method at the semantic level with templated summaries and matrix analysis. Thirty-three individuals (physicians [<i>n</i> = 21], APPs [<i>n</i> = 10], practice manager [<i>n</i> = 1], and patient representative [<i>n</i> = 1]) participated in six focus groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four themes emerged from the analysis of the focus groups, including: (1) staffing models with APPs are rapidly evolving, (2) these changes were felt to be driven by staffing shortages, financial models, and governance with minimal consideration to teamwork and relationships, (3) time-based billing was perceived to value tasks over cognitive workload, and (4) that the proposed billing changes may create unintended consequences impacting collaboration and professional satisfaction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Physician and APP collaborative care models are increasingly evolving to independent visits often driven by workloads, financial drivers, and local regulations such as medical staff rules and hospital bylaws. Understanding which staffing models produce optimal patient, clinician, and organizational outcomes should inform billing policies rather than the reverse.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhm.13356","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Medicare previously announced plans for new billing reforms for inpatient visits that are shared by physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) whereby the clinician spending the most time on the patient visit would bill for the visit.

Objective

To understand how inpatient hospital medicine teams utilize APPs in patient care and how the proposed billing policies might impact future APP utilization.

Design, Setting and Participants

We conducted focus groups with hospitalist physicians, APPs, and other leaders from 21 academic hospitals across the United States. Utilizing rapid qualitative methods, focus groups were analyzed using a mixed inductive and deductive method at the semantic level with templated summaries and matrix analysis. Thirty-three individuals (physicians [n = 21], APPs [n = 10], practice manager [n = 1], and patient representative [n = 1]) participated in six focus groups.

Results

Four themes emerged from the analysis of the focus groups, including: (1) staffing models with APPs are rapidly evolving, (2) these changes were felt to be driven by staffing shortages, financial models, and governance with minimal consideration to teamwork and relationships, (3) time-based billing was perceived to value tasks over cognitive workload, and (4) that the proposed billing changes may create unintended consequences impacting collaboration and professional satisfaction.

Conclusions

Physician and APP collaborative care models are increasingly evolving to independent visits often driven by workloads, financial drivers, and local regulations such as medical staff rules and hospital bylaws. Understanding which staffing models produce optimal patient, clinician, and organizational outcomes should inform billing policies rather than the reverse.

Abstract Image

计费改革对学术医院医生和高级医疗服务提供者合作的影响:定性研究
此前,医疗保险计划对由医生和高级医疗服务提供者(APP)共同承担的住院病人就诊费用进行新的计费改革,即由在病人就诊过程中花费时间最长的临床医生支付就诊费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信