Controlling response order without relying on stimulus order – evidence for flexible representations of task order

Jens Kürten, Tilo Strobach, Lynn Huestegge
{"title":"Controlling response order without relying on stimulus order – evidence for flexible representations of task order","authors":"Jens Kürten, Tilo Strobach, Lynn Huestegge","doi":"10.1007/s00426-024-01953-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In dual-task situations, both component tasks are typically not executed simultaneously but rather one after another. Task order is usually determined based on bottom-up information provided by stimulus presentation order, but also affected by top-down factors such as instructions and/or differentially dominant component tasks (e.g., oculomotor task prioritization). Recent research demonstrated that in the context of a randomly switching stimulus order, task order representations can be integrated with specific component task information rather than being coded in a purely abstract fashion (i.e., by containing only generic order information). This conclusion was derived from observing consistently smaller task-order switch costs for a preferred (e.g., oculomotor-manual) versus a non-preferred (e.g., manual-oculomotor) task order (i.e., order-switch cost asymmetries). Since such a representational format might have been especially promoted by the sequential stimulus presentation employed, we investigated task-order representations in situations without any bottom-up influence of stimulus order. To this end, we presented task stimuli simultaneously and cued the required task-order in advance. Experiment 1 employed abstract order transition cues that only indicated a task-order repetition (vs. switch) relative to the previous trial, while Experiment 2 used explicit cues that unambiguously indicated the task-order. Experiment 1 revealed significant task-order switch costs <i>only</i> for the second task (of either task order) and no order-switch cost asymmetries, indicating a rather generic representation of task order. Experiment 2 revealed task-order switch costs in <i>both</i> component tasks with a trend toward order-switch cost asymmetries, indicating an integration of task order representations with component task information. These findings highlight an astonishing flexibility of mental task-order representations during task-order control.</p>","PeriodicalId":501681,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01953-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In dual-task situations, both component tasks are typically not executed simultaneously but rather one after another. Task order is usually determined based on bottom-up information provided by stimulus presentation order, but also affected by top-down factors such as instructions and/or differentially dominant component tasks (e.g., oculomotor task prioritization). Recent research demonstrated that in the context of a randomly switching stimulus order, task order representations can be integrated with specific component task information rather than being coded in a purely abstract fashion (i.e., by containing only generic order information). This conclusion was derived from observing consistently smaller task-order switch costs for a preferred (e.g., oculomotor-manual) versus a non-preferred (e.g., manual-oculomotor) task order (i.e., order-switch cost asymmetries). Since such a representational format might have been especially promoted by the sequential stimulus presentation employed, we investigated task-order representations in situations without any bottom-up influence of stimulus order. To this end, we presented task stimuli simultaneously and cued the required task-order in advance. Experiment 1 employed abstract order transition cues that only indicated a task-order repetition (vs. switch) relative to the previous trial, while Experiment 2 used explicit cues that unambiguously indicated the task-order. Experiment 1 revealed significant task-order switch costs only for the second task (of either task order) and no order-switch cost asymmetries, indicating a rather generic representation of task order. Experiment 2 revealed task-order switch costs in both component tasks with a trend toward order-switch cost asymmetries, indicating an integration of task order representations with component task information. These findings highlight an astonishing flexibility of mental task-order representations during task-order control.

Abstract Image

不依赖刺激顺序控制反应顺序--任务顺序灵活表征的证据
在双任务情况下,两个任务通常不是同时执行,而是相继执行。任务顺序通常是根据刺激呈现顺序所提供的自下而上的信息来决定的,但也会受到自上而下的因素影响,如指令和/或不同的主导成分任务(如眼动任务优先级)。最近的研究表明,在随机切换刺激顺序的情况下,任务顺序表征可以与特定的组成任务信息相结合,而不是以纯抽象的方式进行编码(即只包含一般的顺序信息)。这一结论来自于观察到优先任务顺序(如眼动-手动)与非优先任务顺序(如手动-眼动)的任务顺序切换成本一直较小(即顺序切换成本不对称)。由于这种表征形式可能特别受到所采用的顺序刺激呈现方式的影响,因此我们研究了在不受刺激顺序自下而上影响的情况下的任务顺序表征。为此,我们同时呈现任务刺激,并提前提示所需的任务顺序。实验 1 采用了抽象的顺序转换提示,只表示相对于上一次试验的任务顺序重复(与转换),而实验 2 则采用了明确的提示,毫不含糊地表示任务顺序。实验 1 显示,只有第二项任务(任一任务顺序)的任务顺序转换成本显著,而且没有顺序转换成本的不对称性,这表明任务顺序的表征相当通用。实验 2 显示,在两个任务中都存在任务顺序转换成本,而且存在顺序转换成本不对称的趋势,这表明任务顺序表征与任务信息整合在一起。这些发现凸显了心理任务顺序表征在任务顺序控制过程中惊人的灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信