Lateral load response and collapse probability of reinforced concrete shear walls retrofitted for repairability

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Pinar Okumus, Sina Basereh, Sriram Aaleti
{"title":"Lateral load response and collapse probability of reinforced concrete shear walls retrofitted for repairability","authors":"Pinar Okumus,&nbsp;Sina Basereh,&nbsp;Sriram Aaleti","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper demonstrates the efficacy of a new reinforced concrete shear wall seismic retrofit method through a series of nonlinear static and incremental dynamic analyses. Unlike traditional retrofit methods, the method investigated aims to convert conventional walls into self-centering walls whose behavior is governed by rocking and flexure. The retrofit involves creating a cold joint at the foundation–wall interface, cutting some reinforcing bars to allow rocking, adding external post-tensioning to enable self-centering, and externally confining wall toes to prevent concrete crushing. The retrofit was applied to two building archetypes, each with two different shear wall designs. The four walls were retrofitted by varying retrofit parameters (portion of the vertical reinforcement bars cut, and external post-tensioning amount). Nonlinear static and nonlinear response history analyses were performed using experimentally validated, computationally efficient models that simulate walls with fiber-based beam–column elements. Incremental dynamic analysis was used to create collapse fragility functions for pre- and post-retrofit walls. The results show that the retrofit is effective when some vertical reinforcement bars are left uncut across the foundation–wall interface. The retrofit is more effective for walls with vertical reinforcement distributed across cross-section as compared to walls with reinforcement concentrated near boundary elements and for walls with structurally efficient amounts of reinforcement as compared to walls with higher amounts of reinforcement. This is attributed to the larger amount of reinforcement bars cut in walls with concentrated reinforcement layouts or heavy reinforcement amounts, leading to a larger loss of strength, recovery of which requires larger amounts of post-tensioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the efficacy of a new reinforced concrete shear wall seismic retrofit method through a series of nonlinear static and incremental dynamic analyses. Unlike traditional retrofit methods, the method investigated aims to convert conventional walls into self-centering walls whose behavior is governed by rocking and flexure. The retrofit involves creating a cold joint at the foundation–wall interface, cutting some reinforcing bars to allow rocking, adding external post-tensioning to enable self-centering, and externally confining wall toes to prevent concrete crushing. The retrofit was applied to two building archetypes, each with two different shear wall designs. The four walls were retrofitted by varying retrofit parameters (portion of the vertical reinforcement bars cut, and external post-tensioning amount). Nonlinear static and nonlinear response history analyses were performed using experimentally validated, computationally efficient models that simulate walls with fiber-based beam–column elements. Incremental dynamic analysis was used to create collapse fragility functions for pre- and post-retrofit walls. The results show that the retrofit is effective when some vertical reinforcement bars are left uncut across the foundation–wall interface. The retrofit is more effective for walls with vertical reinforcement distributed across cross-section as compared to walls with reinforcement concentrated near boundary elements and for walls with structurally efficient amounts of reinforcement as compared to walls with higher amounts of reinforcement. This is attributed to the larger amount of reinforcement bars cut in walls with concentrated reinforcement layouts or heavy reinforcement amounts, leading to a larger loss of strength, recovery of which requires larger amounts of post-tensioning.

钢筋混凝土剪力墙的侧向荷载响应和倒塌概率
本文通过一系列非线性静态和增量动态分析,展示了一种新型钢筋混凝土剪力墙抗震改造方法的功效。与传统的改造方法不同,所研究的方法旨在将传统墙体改造为自定心墙体,其行为受摇晃和弯曲控制。改造方法包括在地基与墙体交接处创建冷缝,切断部分钢筋以允许摇晃,增加外部后张力以实现自定心,以及外部约束墙趾以防止混凝土破碎。改造工程适用于两种建筑原型,每种原型都有两种不同的剪力墙设计。通过改变改造参数(切割垂直钢筋的部分和外部后张力的数量)对四面墙进行了改造。非线性静态和非线性响应历史分析是使用经过实验验证、计算效率高的模型进行的,该模型使用基于纤维的梁柱元素模拟墙体。增量动态分析用于创建改造前和改造后墙体的坍塌脆性函数。结果表明,当一些竖向钢筋在地基-墙体界面上未被切断时,改造是有效的。与钢筋集中在边界构件附近的墙体相比,垂直钢筋分布在整个横截面上的墙体的改造效果更好;与钢筋数量较多的墙体相比,结构有效钢筋数量较多的墙体的改造效果更好。这是因为在钢筋集中布置或钢筋数量较多的墙体中,切割的钢筋数量较多,导致强度损失较大,而要恢复强度则需要较大数量的后张力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信