Sharmin Akter, Carol A. Wilson, Anwar Hossain Bhuiyan, Syed Humayun Akhter, Michael S. Steckler, Md. Masud Rana
{"title":"Elevation Dynamics Between Polders and the Natural Sundarbans of the Ganges-Brahmaputra Delta Plain","authors":"Sharmin Akter, Carol A. Wilson, Anwar Hossain Bhuiyan, Syed Humayun Akhter, Michael S. Steckler, Md. Masud Rana","doi":"10.1007/s12237-024-01349-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Ganges-Brahmaputra Delta (GBD) in Bangladesh exists at a nexus of stability and vulnerability, as the rivers annually carry ~ 800–1000 MT of sediment from the Himalayan Mountains, yet coastal poldering and sediment extraction within the rivers remove elevation capital from the low-lying delta plain. Recent research in the GBD has begun to unravel how the world’s largest fluvio-deltaic mangrove forest—the Sundarbans—is keeping pace with sea level rise (SLR); however, this is contingent on adequate sediment supply delivered to the platform during semi-diurnal tides and the seasonal monsoon. Little is known about the elevation dynamics within human-modified polders by comparison, other than an elevation deficit of 1–1.5 m exists. In this study, seasonal data from Rod Surface Elevation Tables (RSETs) installed within a polder in the southwest region (Polder 32) are compared to the Sundarbans. Over ~ 8 years, results show that surface elevation is gaining within the Sundarbans at a more significant rate (~ 58.4%), and this is due to the higher vertical accretion rates measured in the Sundarbans (~ 67%) from abundant sources of allochthonous material. Elevation gain in the polder, particularly close to the embankment, appears to be attributed to sediment supplied from eroded embankments and local sluice gates, in addition to seasonal subsurface clay swelling during the monsoon. Shallow subsidence within both study areas appears to take place seasonally, but with less delivery of new sediment, the rate of shallow subsidence is lower in the polder compared to the Sundarbans. Despite seasonal shallow subsidence, the elevation change is net positive in both study areas if taken as a whole; however, interior poldered regions exhibit net elevation loss. This comparison in change of elevation, vertical accretion, and shallow subsidence shows how human modification has drastically changed the natural processes. Furthermore, our results are compared to rates of relative and effective SLR, which show that the Sundarbans is keeping pace in this region, while Polder 32 is not. These results are vital to inform embankment mitigation and flood risk in this dynamic delta system.</p>","PeriodicalId":11921,"journal":{"name":"Estuaries and Coasts","volume":"147 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estuaries and Coasts","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-024-01349-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Ganges-Brahmaputra Delta (GBD) in Bangladesh exists at a nexus of stability and vulnerability, as the rivers annually carry ~ 800–1000 MT of sediment from the Himalayan Mountains, yet coastal poldering and sediment extraction within the rivers remove elevation capital from the low-lying delta plain. Recent research in the GBD has begun to unravel how the world’s largest fluvio-deltaic mangrove forest—the Sundarbans—is keeping pace with sea level rise (SLR); however, this is contingent on adequate sediment supply delivered to the platform during semi-diurnal tides and the seasonal monsoon. Little is known about the elevation dynamics within human-modified polders by comparison, other than an elevation deficit of 1–1.5 m exists. In this study, seasonal data from Rod Surface Elevation Tables (RSETs) installed within a polder in the southwest region (Polder 32) are compared to the Sundarbans. Over ~ 8 years, results show that surface elevation is gaining within the Sundarbans at a more significant rate (~ 58.4%), and this is due to the higher vertical accretion rates measured in the Sundarbans (~ 67%) from abundant sources of allochthonous material. Elevation gain in the polder, particularly close to the embankment, appears to be attributed to sediment supplied from eroded embankments and local sluice gates, in addition to seasonal subsurface clay swelling during the monsoon. Shallow subsidence within both study areas appears to take place seasonally, but with less delivery of new sediment, the rate of shallow subsidence is lower in the polder compared to the Sundarbans. Despite seasonal shallow subsidence, the elevation change is net positive in both study areas if taken as a whole; however, interior poldered regions exhibit net elevation loss. This comparison in change of elevation, vertical accretion, and shallow subsidence shows how human modification has drastically changed the natural processes. Furthermore, our results are compared to rates of relative and effective SLR, which show that the Sundarbans is keeping pace in this region, while Polder 32 is not. These results are vital to inform embankment mitigation and flood risk in this dynamic delta system.
期刊介绍:
Estuaries and Coasts is the journal of the Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation (CERF). Begun in 1977 as Chesapeake Science, the journal has gradually expanded its scope and circulation. Today, the journal publishes scholarly manuscripts on estuarine and near coastal ecosystems at the interface between the land and the sea where there are tidal fluctuations or sea water is diluted by fresh water. The interface is broadly defined to include estuaries and nearshore coastal waters including lagoons, wetlands, tidal fresh water, shores and beaches, but not the continental shelf. The journal covers research on physical, chemical, geological or biological processes, as well as applications to management of estuaries and coasts. The journal publishes original research findings, reviews and perspectives, techniques, comments, and management applications. Estuaries and Coasts will consider properly carried out studies that present inconclusive findings or document a failed replication of previously published work. Submissions that are primarily descriptive, strongly place-based, or only report on development of models or new methods without detailing their applications fall outside the scope of the journal.