Lactic acid bacteria and manganese-based additives for improved lucerne, perennial grass, and perennial grass-white clover preservation as silage

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Ivana Nikodinoska, Eva Wambacq, Sofie Landschoot, Colm A. Moran
{"title":"Lactic acid bacteria and manganese-based additives for improved lucerne, perennial grass, and perennial grass-white clover preservation as silage","authors":"Ivana Nikodinoska,&nbsp;Eva Wambacq,&nbsp;Sofie Landschoot,&nbsp;Colm A. Moran","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are commonly used as silage inoculants. Manganese sulphate (MnSO<sub>4</sub>) has been proposed to protect certain LAB during oxygen exposure and improve silage aerobic stability (ASTA). The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of inoculants in preservation of different forages. A short-term screening trial investigated the effect of 24 additive treatments, compared to a negative control, on ensiling perennial grass in mini-silos (2.75 L) for 7 d. The additive treatments comprised different ratios of <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> [IMI 507026, IMI 507027, and IMI 507028] and <i>Pediococcus pentacaceus</i> [IMI 507024 and IMI 507025], with or without MnSO<sub>4</sub>. Target parameters, such as low levels of fresh matter loss, pH, acetic acid, ammonia-nitrogen fraction (NH<sub>3</sub>–N/Total N), and high levels of lactic acid and ASTA, were considered for treatment selection. Eight treatments were selected based on a principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering of the target parameters. These selected treatments subsequently underwent a 100 d long-term trial using lucerne, perennial grass, and perennial grass-white clover forages. All silages treated with the eight additives exhibited an improved homolactic fermentation and a lower (<i>p</i> &lt; .001) pH, acetic acid, and ethanol content than the control. Although DM losses and ASTA markedly improved in the treatments containing MnSO<sub>4</sub> in the short-term trial, these effects were not observed in the long-term trial. These outcomes suggest that the selected additives can improve silage fermentation quality across a broad range of forages, but further studies are required to assess the impact of MnSO<sub>4</sub> on ASTA.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gfs.12668","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12668","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are commonly used as silage inoculants. Manganese sulphate (MnSO4) has been proposed to protect certain LAB during oxygen exposure and improve silage aerobic stability (ASTA). The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of inoculants in preservation of different forages. A short-term screening trial investigated the effect of 24 additive treatments, compared to a negative control, on ensiling perennial grass in mini-silos (2.75 L) for 7 d. The additive treatments comprised different ratios of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum [IMI 507026, IMI 507027, and IMI 507028] and Pediococcus pentacaceus [IMI 507024 and IMI 507025], with or without MnSO4. Target parameters, such as low levels of fresh matter loss, pH, acetic acid, ammonia-nitrogen fraction (NH3–N/Total N), and high levels of lactic acid and ASTA, were considered for treatment selection. Eight treatments were selected based on a principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering of the target parameters. These selected treatments subsequently underwent a 100 d long-term trial using lucerne, perennial grass, and perennial grass-white clover forages. All silages treated with the eight additives exhibited an improved homolactic fermentation and a lower (p < .001) pH, acetic acid, and ethanol content than the control. Although DM losses and ASTA markedly improved in the treatments containing MnSO4 in the short-term trial, these effects were not observed in the long-term trial. These outcomes suggest that the selected additives can improve silage fermentation quality across a broad range of forages, but further studies are required to assess the impact of MnSO4 on ASTA.

Abstract Image

乳酸菌和锰基添加剂用于改善苜蓿、多年生牧草和多年生牧草-白三叶作为青贮饲料的保存效果
乳酸菌(LAB)通常用作青贮饲料接种剂。硫酸锰(MnSO4)被认为可以在氧气暴露时保护某些乳酸菌,并提高青贮饲料的有氧稳定性(ASTA)。本研究旨在评估接种剂在保存不同饲草方面的功效。一项短期筛选试验调查了 24 种添加剂处理与阴性对照相比对在微型青贮窖(2.75 升)中贮藏多年生牧草 7 天的影响。添加剂处理包括不同比例的植物乳杆菌[IMI 507026、IMI 507027 和 IMI 507028]和五谷乳杆菌[IMI 507024 和 IMI 507025],添加或不添加硫酸锰。在选择处理时考虑了目标参数,如低水平的新鲜物质损失、pH 值、乙酸、氨氮组分(NH3-N/总氮)以及高水平的乳酸和 ASTA。根据目标参数的主成分分析和分层聚类,选出了八个处理。这些选定的处理随后使用苜蓿、多年生禾本科牧草和多年生禾本科-白三叶牧草进行了 100 天的长期试验。与对照组相比,使用这八种添加剂处理的所有青贮饲料都改善了同乳酸发酵,pH值、乙酸和乙醇含量也更低(p < .001)。虽然在短期试验中,含有硫酸锰的处理明显改善了 DM 损失和 ASTA,但在长期试验中却没有观察到这些效果。这些结果表明,所选添加剂可改善多种饲草的青贮发酵质量,但还需要进一步研究以评估硫酸锰对 ASTA 的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信