Exploring the impact of perceived social media agility on co-creation opportunities and brand attachment: the moderating role of technology reflectiveness

IF 5.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Emma Welch, David Gligor, Sıddık Bozkurt
{"title":"Exploring the impact of perceived social media agility on co-creation opportunities and brand attachment: the moderating role of technology reflectiveness","authors":"Emma Welch, David Gligor, Sıddık Bozkurt","doi":"10.1108/jpbm-12-2022-4275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to address how perceived social media agility can promulgate co-creation processes, such as co-production and value-in-use, and how it impacts brand-related outcomes. This study also addresses calls for marketing scholars to investigate the types of personality traits that affect these potential relationships by accounting for the impact of technology reflectiveness.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This paper conducted an online survey with 321 adult subjects. The direct, indirect and conditional (moderation) effects were assessed using multivariate regression, various PROCESS models and the Johnson–Neyman technique (to probe the interaction terms). Additional supplemental analyses were conducted via PROCESS models.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results show that perceived social media agility directly and indirectly (through co-production and value-in-use) positively influences brand attachment and that the order of these two processes matters (co-production followed by value-in-use). Results also show that the positive impact of perceived social media agility on co-production and value-in-use deviates for customers high in technology reflectiveness but can be manipulated according to which process comes first.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper expounds on the new construct of perceived social media agility by uniquely linking perceived social media agility to two distinct value co-creation processes (co-production and value-in-use) and brand-related outcomes while highlighting how consumer-specific traits can affect this relationship in a social media setting.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product and Brand Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product and Brand Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-12-2022-4275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to address how perceived social media agility can promulgate co-creation processes, such as co-production and value-in-use, and how it impacts brand-related outcomes. This study also addresses calls for marketing scholars to investigate the types of personality traits that affect these potential relationships by accounting for the impact of technology reflectiveness.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper conducted an online survey with 321 adult subjects. The direct, indirect and conditional (moderation) effects were assessed using multivariate regression, various PROCESS models and the Johnson–Neyman technique (to probe the interaction terms). Additional supplemental analyses were conducted via PROCESS models.

Findings

The results show that perceived social media agility directly and indirectly (through co-production and value-in-use) positively influences brand attachment and that the order of these two processes matters (co-production followed by value-in-use). Results also show that the positive impact of perceived social media agility on co-production and value-in-use deviates for customers high in technology reflectiveness but can be manipulated according to which process comes first.

Originality/value

This paper expounds on the new construct of perceived social media agility by uniquely linking perceived social media agility to two distinct value co-creation processes (co-production and value-in-use) and brand-related outcomes while highlighting how consumer-specific traits can affect this relationship in a social media setting.

探索感知到的社交媒体敏捷性对共同创造机会和品牌依恋的影响:技术反思的调节作用
目的 本文旨在探讨感知到的社交媒体敏捷性如何促进共同创造过程,如共同生产和使用价值,以及它如何影响品牌相关结果。本研究还呼吁营销学者通过考虑技术反思性的影响来调查影响这些潜在关系的人格特质类型。设计/方法/途径本文对 321 名成年受试者进行了在线调查。采用多元回归、各种 PROCESS 模型和约翰逊-奈曼技术(探究交互项)对直接、间接和条件(调节)效应进行了评估。结果表明,感知到的社交媒体敏捷性直接和间接(通过共同生产和使用价值)对品牌依恋产生积极影响,而且这两个过程的顺序很重要(先共同生产后使用价值)。结果还显示,对于技术反思能力较强的客户,感知到的社交媒体敏捷性对共同生产和使用价值的积极影响存在偏差,但可以根据哪个过程优先来进行调节。 原创性/价值 本文通过将感知到的社交媒体敏捷性与两个不同的价值共同创造过程(共同生产和使用价值)和品牌相关结果独特地联系起来,阐述了感知到的社交媒体敏捷性这一新概念,同时强调了在社交媒体环境下,消费者的特定特征会如何影响这种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Branding has evolved and organizations are facing a lot of new challenges when managing their brand reputations, an activity that has become strategic and interdisciplinary. The Journal of Product and Brand Management (JPBM) advances the theoretical and managerial knowledge of products and brands. Manuscripts may either report results based on rigorously analysed qualitative/quantitative data or be purely conceptual. All manuscripts must offer significant research findings and insights and offer meaningful implications for the real world. This journal is proudly international and inter-disciplinary. We publish manuscripts which compare international markets and encourage submissions approaching branding and product management from any discipline. We focus on all aspects of branding and product management from development to dilution. This includes areas as broad as person, place or political brands.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信