Unravelling the lung cancer diagnostic pathway: identifying gaps and opportunities for improvement

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Mateja Marc Malovrh, Katja Adamic
{"title":"Unravelling the lung cancer diagnostic pathway: identifying gaps and opportunities for improvement","authors":"Mateja Marc Malovrh, Katja Adamic","doi":"10.2478/raon-2024-0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background A fast and well-organized complex diagnostic process is important for better success in the treatment of lung cancer patients. The aim of our study was to reveal the gaps and inefficiencies in the diagnostic process and to suggest improvement strategies in a single tertiary centre in Slovenia. Patients and methods We employed a comprehensive approach to carefully dissect all the steps in the diagnostic journey for individuals suspected of having lung cancer. We gathered and analysed information from employees and patients involved in the process by dedicated questionnaires. Further, we analysed the patients’ data and calculated the diagnostic intervals for patients in two different periods. Results The major concerns among employees were stress and excessive administrative work. The important result of the visual journey and staff reports was the design of electronic diagnostic clinical pathway (eDCP), which could substantially increase safety and efficacy by diminishing the administrative burden of the employees. The patients were generally highly satisfied with diagnostic journey, but reported too long waiting times. By analysing two time periods, we revealed that diagnostic intervals exceeded the recommended timelines and got importantly shorter after two interventions - strengthening the diagnostic team and specially by purchase of additional PET-CT machine (the average time from general practitioner (GP) referral to the multidisciplinary treatment board (MDTB) decision was 50.8 [± 3.0] prior and 37.1 [± 2.3] days after the interventions). Conclusions The study illuminated opportunities for refining the diagnostic journey for lung cancer patients, underscoring the importance of both administrative and capacity-related enhancements.","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background A fast and well-organized complex diagnostic process is important for better success in the treatment of lung cancer patients. The aim of our study was to reveal the gaps and inefficiencies in the diagnostic process and to suggest improvement strategies in a single tertiary centre in Slovenia. Patients and methods We employed a comprehensive approach to carefully dissect all the steps in the diagnostic journey for individuals suspected of having lung cancer. We gathered and analysed information from employees and patients involved in the process by dedicated questionnaires. Further, we analysed the patients’ data and calculated the diagnostic intervals for patients in two different periods. Results The major concerns among employees were stress and excessive administrative work. The important result of the visual journey and staff reports was the design of electronic diagnostic clinical pathway (eDCP), which could substantially increase safety and efficacy by diminishing the administrative burden of the employees. The patients were generally highly satisfied with diagnostic journey, but reported too long waiting times. By analysing two time periods, we revealed that diagnostic intervals exceeded the recommended timelines and got importantly shorter after two interventions - strengthening the diagnostic team and specially by purchase of additional PET-CT machine (the average time from general practitioner (GP) referral to the multidisciplinary treatment board (MDTB) decision was 50.8 [± 3.0] prior and 37.1 [± 2.3] days after the interventions). Conclusions The study illuminated opportunities for refining the diagnostic journey for lung cancer patients, underscoring the importance of both administrative and capacity-related enhancements.
解读肺癌诊断路径:找出差距和改进机会
背景快速而有序的复杂诊断过程对于肺癌患者的治疗取得更大成功非常重要。我们的研究旨在揭示诊断过程中存在的不足和效率低下的问题,并提出改进策略。患者和方法 我们采用了一种全面的方法来仔细剖析疑似肺癌患者诊断过程中的所有步骤。我们通过专门的调查问卷收集并分析了参与这一过程的员工和患者的信息。此外,我们还分析了患者的数据,并计算了患者在两个不同时期的诊断间隔。结果 员工的主要担忧是压力和过多的行政工作。视觉之旅和员工报告的重要成果是设计了电子临床诊断路径(eDCP),通过减轻员工的行政负担,大大提高了安全性和有效性。患者对诊断流程的满意度普遍较高,但表示等待时间过长。通过对两个时间段进行分析,我们发现诊断间隔超过了建议的时限,而在采取了加强诊断团队和特别是购买额外 PET-CT 设备这两项干预措施后,诊断间隔明显缩短(从全科医生(GP)转诊到多学科治疗委员会(MDTB)做出决定的平均时间在采取干预措施前为 50.8 [± 3.0]天,在采取干预措施后为 37.1 [± 2.3]天)。结论 该研究为完善肺癌患者的诊断过程提供了机会,强调了行政管理和能力提升的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiology and Oncology
Radiology and Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信