Development and validation procedure of the higher educational facilities scale (HEFS)

IF 1.1 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Deepa Thomas, Joseph Chacko Chennattuserry, Kennedy Andrew Thomas
{"title":"Development and validation procedure of the higher educational facilities scale (HEFS)","authors":"Deepa Thomas, Joseph Chacko Chennattuserry, Kennedy Andrew Thomas","doi":"10.1108/pm-07-2023-0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a scale to assess the influence of Higher Educational Facilities for the growth of education in higher education institutions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The first step in the process of scale development is to generate an item pool containing as many items as possible which captures the construct of interest. A total of 111 items were constructed for the initial try-out of the scale measuring the construct of higher educational facilities. This rating scale was based on the Likert-type was designed, where each item had to be rated on a five-point scale. The scale consisted of a few items involving the dimensions of infrastructure, quality assessment and quality assurance regard to the vision actualization.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Higher Educational Facilities Scale (HEFS) was developed by the investigator and designed in the format of a 5-point rating scale of the Likert type. There are different phases identified for the scale construction. In the first phase, items are created and the content’s validity is determined. The scale is constructed in the second phase. Pre-testing the questions, administering the survey, reducing the number of items and determining how many factors the scale captures are all steps in the scale construction process. The number of dimensions, reliability and validity are all verified in the third phase, scale evaluation. In developing the scale, the content and face validity was ascertained. The reliability of the scale and its three subscales were established. This scale has potential value for policymakers to assess the perception held by the religious faculty members working in higher education institutions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The research is part of the doctoral thesis by Dr Deepa Thomas under the supervision of Dr Fr. Joseph C. C. and the co-supervision of Dr Kennedy Andrew Thomas. The purpose of the scale is to assess the higher educational facilities of in institutions of higher Education. Quality, excellence and service are the vision and purpose of higher education institutions to provide ample opportunities and good facilities for their beneficiaries, thus creating tremendous changes in the Indian education scenario.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46102,"journal":{"name":"Property Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Property Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pm-07-2023-0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a scale to assess the influence of Higher Educational Facilities for the growth of education in higher education institutions.

Design/methodology/approach

The first step in the process of scale development is to generate an item pool containing as many items as possible which captures the construct of interest. A total of 111 items were constructed for the initial try-out of the scale measuring the construct of higher educational facilities. This rating scale was based on the Likert-type was designed, where each item had to be rated on a five-point scale. The scale consisted of a few items involving the dimensions of infrastructure, quality assessment and quality assurance regard to the vision actualization.

Findings

Higher Educational Facilities Scale (HEFS) was developed by the investigator and designed in the format of a 5-point rating scale of the Likert type. There are different phases identified for the scale construction. In the first phase, items are created and the content’s validity is determined. The scale is constructed in the second phase. Pre-testing the questions, administering the survey, reducing the number of items and determining how many factors the scale captures are all steps in the scale construction process. The number of dimensions, reliability and validity are all verified in the third phase, scale evaluation. In developing the scale, the content and face validity was ascertained. The reliability of the scale and its three subscales were established. This scale has potential value for policymakers to assess the perception held by the religious faculty members working in higher education institutions.

Originality/value

The research is part of the doctoral thesis by Dr Deepa Thomas under the supervision of Dr Fr. Joseph C. C. and the co-supervision of Dr Kennedy Andrew Thomas. The purpose of the scale is to assess the higher educational facilities of in institutions of higher Education. Quality, excellence and service are the vision and purpose of higher education institutions to provide ample opportunities and good facilities for their beneficiaries, thus creating tremendous changes in the Indian education scenario.

高等教育设施量表(HEFS)的编制和验证程序
本研究的目的是开发并验证一个量表,以评估高等教育设施对高等教育机构教育发展的影响。设计/方法/途径量表开发过程的第一步是生成一个项目库,其中包含尽可能多的项目,以捕捉感兴趣的建构。在测量高等教育设施构念的量表的初步尝试中,共构建了 111 个项目。这个评分量表是基于李克特量表设计的,每个项目都必须用五点量表来评分。研究结果 高等教育设施量表(HEFS)由研究者编制,采用李克特式 5 点评分量表。量表的编制分为不同的阶段。在第一阶段,创建项目并确定内容的有效性。在第二阶段构建量表。对问题进行预先测试、实施调查、减少项目数量以及确定量表所包含的因素数量都是量表构建过程中的步骤。量表的维数、信度和效度都将在第三阶段,即量表评估中得到验证。在编制量表的过程中,要确定内容效度和表面效度。量表及其三个分量表的信度已经确定。本量表对政策制定者评估高等教育机构宗教教职人员的看法具有潜在价值。该量表旨在评估高等教育机构的高等教育设施。质量、卓越和服务是高等教育机构的愿景和宗旨,为受益者提供充足的机会和良好的设施,从而为印度的教育状况带来巨大的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Property Management
Property Management MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Property Management publishes: ■Refereed papers on important current trends and reserach issues ■Digests of market reports and data ■In-depth analysis of a specific area ■Legal updates on judgments in landlord and tenant law ■Regular book and internet reviews providing an overview of the growing body of property market research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信