Differential price pass-through in organic and conventional fresh fruit and vegetable markets

IF 4.2 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Qingxiao Li, Metin Çakır, Timothy K. M. Beatty, Timothy A. Park
{"title":"Differential price pass-through in organic and conventional fresh fruit and vegetable markets","authors":"Qingxiao Li, Metin Çakır, Timothy K. M. Beatty, Timothy A. Park","doi":"10.1111/ajae.12469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organic food production growth has remained relatively slow compared to organic retail sales growth in the United States. This paper questions whether the conduct of downstream agents plays any role in explaining the difference. Mainly, we shed light on structural differences between organic and conventional fresh fruit and vegetable markets by examining differential price pass-through rates. We estimate a rolling-window retail pricing model using retail and wholesale price data from five metropolitan statistical areas with terminal markets in the United States. We find that pass-through rates are 10 to 15 percentage points lower in the organic market, and the differences are statistically significant. We also find that the gap between pass-through rates narrows as the organic market share increases. Our results suggest the organic market is significantly less competitive than the conventional market. The implication is that farmers may have less incentive to convert to organic farming as they may not capture the full retail price premium consumers pay.","PeriodicalId":55537,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"255 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12469","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organic food production growth has remained relatively slow compared to organic retail sales growth in the United States. This paper questions whether the conduct of downstream agents plays any role in explaining the difference. Mainly, we shed light on structural differences between organic and conventional fresh fruit and vegetable markets by examining differential price pass-through rates. We estimate a rolling-window retail pricing model using retail and wholesale price data from five metropolitan statistical areas with terminal markets in the United States. We find that pass-through rates are 10 to 15 percentage points lower in the organic market, and the differences are statistically significant. We also find that the gap between pass-through rates narrows as the organic market share increases. Our results suggest the organic market is significantly less competitive than the conventional market. The implication is that farmers may have less incentive to convert to organic farming as they may not capture the full retail price premium consumers pay.
有机和常规新鲜果蔬市场的价格传递差异
与美国有机食品零售额的增长相比,有机食品生产的增长仍然相对缓慢。本文提出的问题是,下游代理商的行为是否在解释这种差异方面发挥了作用。我们主要通过研究不同的价格传递率来揭示有机和传统新鲜果蔬市场之间的结构性差异。我们利用美国五个大都市统计区终端市场的零售和批发价格数据,对滚动窗口零售定价模型进行了估算。我们发现,有机产品市场的价格传递率要低 10 到 15 个百分点,而且在统计上差异显著。我们还发现,随着有机市场份额的增加,转嫁率之间的差距也在缩小。我们的研究结果表明,有机市场的竞争力明显低于传统市场。这意味着,由于农民可能无法获得消费者支付的全部零售溢价,因此他们转为有机农业的积极性可能较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Agricultural Economics provides a forum for creative and scholarly work on the economics of agriculture and food, natural resources and the environment, and rural and community development throughout the world. Papers should relate to one of these areas, should have a problem orientation, and should demonstrate originality and innovation in analysis, methods, or application. Analyses of problems pertinent to research, extension, and teaching are equally encouraged, as is interdisciplinary research with a significant economic component. Review articles that offer a comprehensive and insightful survey of a relevant subject, consistent with the scope of the Journal as discussed above, will also be considered. All articles published, regardless of their nature, will be held to the same set of scholarly standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信