Quantitation of hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) and metabolites in blood from DUID-cases

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Robert Kronstrand, Markus Roman, Henrik Green, Michael T Truver
{"title":"Quantitation of hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) and metabolites in blood from DUID-cases","authors":"Robert Kronstrand, Markus Roman, Henrik Green, Michael T Truver","doi":"10.1093/jat/bkae030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) was first reported in the EU in May 2022. HHC has three chiral carbon atoms, but only (6aR,9R,10aR)-HHC (9R-HHC) and (6aR,9S,10aR)-HHC (9S-HHC) have been encountered in HHC products. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a method for the quantitative analysis of 9R-HHC, 9S-HHC, 11-OH-9R-HHC, 9R-HHC-COOH, 9S-HHC-COOH, and 8-OH-9R-HHC. In addition, an objective was to investigate the immunochemical cross reactivity. Blood samples from DUID-cases screened positive for cannabis using ELISA and confirmed negative for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), 11-hydroxy-THC, and THC-COOH were reanalyzed with a newly validated HHC method to investigate the presence of HHC and metabolites. The LC-MS/MS method was validated for matrix effects, lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), calibration model, precision, bias, and autosampler stability. Cross reactivity on an ELISA method was investigated separately for 9R-HHC-COOH and 9S-HHC-COOH at a concentration range between 5-200 ng/mL. The cross reactivity was found to be 120% for 9R-HHC-COOH and 48% for 9S-HHC-COOH. In the LCMSMS method 9R-HHC-COOH, 9S-HHC-COOH, and 11-OH-9R-HHC showed matrix effects less than 25% at both concentrations while 8-OH-9R-HHC, 9R-HHC, and 9S-HHC matrix effects exceeded 25% at both concentrations but showed good precision (<10% for both inter and between day) and low bias (<6%) in the further validation. The LLOQ was investigated and established at 0.2 ng/mL for all analytes except the carboxylated metabolites that had an LLOQ of 2.0 ng/mL. The upper limit of quantification was 20 and 200 ng/ml respectively. Reanalysis of cases (N=145) confirmed HHC and metabolites in 32 cases (22%). It was determined that the major metabolite in blood after administration of HHC was 9R-HHC-COOH followed by 11-OH-9R-HHC and that presumptive positive cases are caught by the routine ELISA screening for cannabis.","PeriodicalId":14905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of analytical toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of analytical toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) was first reported in the EU in May 2022. HHC has three chiral carbon atoms, but only (6aR,9R,10aR)-HHC (9R-HHC) and (6aR,9S,10aR)-HHC (9S-HHC) have been encountered in HHC products. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a method for the quantitative analysis of 9R-HHC, 9S-HHC, 11-OH-9R-HHC, 9R-HHC-COOH, 9S-HHC-COOH, and 8-OH-9R-HHC. In addition, an objective was to investigate the immunochemical cross reactivity. Blood samples from DUID-cases screened positive for cannabis using ELISA and confirmed negative for tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), 11-hydroxy-THC, and THC-COOH were reanalyzed with a newly validated HHC method to investigate the presence of HHC and metabolites. The LC-MS/MS method was validated for matrix effects, lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), calibration model, precision, bias, and autosampler stability. Cross reactivity on an ELISA method was investigated separately for 9R-HHC-COOH and 9S-HHC-COOH at a concentration range between 5-200 ng/mL. The cross reactivity was found to be 120% for 9R-HHC-COOH and 48% for 9S-HHC-COOH. In the LCMSMS method 9R-HHC-COOH, 9S-HHC-COOH, and 11-OH-9R-HHC showed matrix effects less than 25% at both concentrations while 8-OH-9R-HHC, 9R-HHC, and 9S-HHC matrix effects exceeded 25% at both concentrations but showed good precision (<10% for both inter and between day) and low bias (<6%) in the further validation. The LLOQ was investigated and established at 0.2 ng/mL for all analytes except the carboxylated metabolites that had an LLOQ of 2.0 ng/mL. The upper limit of quantification was 20 and 200 ng/ml respectively. Reanalysis of cases (N=145) confirmed HHC and metabolites in 32 cases (22%). It was determined that the major metabolite in blood after administration of HHC was 9R-HHC-COOH followed by 11-OH-9R-HHC and that presumptive positive cases are caught by the routine ELISA screening for cannabis.
DUID 病例血液中六氢大麻酚 (HHC) 和代谢物的定量分析
欧盟于 2022 年 5 月首次报告了六氢大麻酚(HHC)。HHC 具有三个手性碳原子,但在 HHC 产品中只出现了 (6aR,9R,10aR)-HHC(9R-HHC)和 (6aR,9S,10aR)-HHC(9S-HHC)。本研究的目标是开发并验证一种定量分析 9R-HHC、9S-HHC、11-OH-9R-HHC、9R-HHC-COOH、9S-HHC-COOH 和 8-OH-9R-HHC 的方法。此外,我们还研究了免疫化学交叉反应性。使用酶联免疫吸附法检测 DUID 病例的血液样本,结果显示大麻呈阳性,但确认四氢大麻酚(THC)、11-羟基-THC 和 THC-COOH 呈阴性。对 LC-MS/MS 方法的基质效应、定量下限 (LLOQ)、校准模型、精确度、偏差和自动进样器稳定性进行了验证。在 5-200 纳克/毫升的浓度范围内,分别对 9R-HHC-COOH 和 9S-HHC-COOH 的酶联免疫吸附法的交叉反应性进行了研究。结果发现,9R-HHC-COOH 和 9S-HHC-COOH 的交叉反应率分别为 120% 和 48%。在 LCMSMS 方法中,9R-HHC-COOH、9S-HHC-COOH 和 11-OH-9R-HHC 在两种浓度下的基质效应均小于 25%,而 8-OH-9R-HHC、9R-HHC 和 9S-HHC 在两种浓度下的基质效应均超过 25%,但在进一步验证中显示出良好的精密度(日间和日间均为 10%)和较低的偏差(6%)。除羧化代谢物的 LLOQ 为 2.0 纳克/毫升外,所有分析物的 LLOQ 均为 0.2 纳克/毫升。定量上限分别为 20 和 200 纳克/毫升。对病例(N=145)的再分析确认了 32 个病例(22%)中的 HHC 和代谢物。经测定,服用 HHC 后血液中的主要代谢物是 9R-HHC-COOH,其次是 11-OH-9R-HHC,通过常规 ELISA 大麻筛查可发现推定阳性病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Analytical Toxicology (JAT) is an international toxicology journal devoted to the timely dissemination of scientific communications concerning potentially toxic substances and drug identification, isolation, and quantitation. Since its inception in 1977, the Journal of Analytical Toxicology has striven to present state-of-the-art techniques used in toxicology labs. The peer-review process provided by the distinguished members of the Editorial Advisory Board ensures the high-quality and integrity of articles published in the Journal of Analytical Toxicology. Timely presentation of the latest toxicology developments is ensured through Technical Notes, Case Reports, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信