Exploring conceptual representation and grounding through perceptual strength norms in deaf individuals

IF 1.1 3区 心理学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Simona Amenta, Giulia Loca, Gabriele Gianfreda, Pasquale Rinaldi, Francesco Pavani
{"title":"Exploring conceptual representation and grounding through perceptual strength norms in deaf individuals","authors":"Simona Amenta, Giulia Loca, Gabriele Gianfreda, Pasquale Rinaldi, Francesco Pavani","doi":"10.1017/langcog.2024.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, our objective was to explore the impact of hearing loss on the conceptual system underlying word meaning. We collected perceptual strength norms for 200 Italian words from early deaf individuals with limited or no access to auditory information and compared them to existing norms from hearing individuals. For each word, participants provided perceptual strength ratings for each perceptual modality. Our results revealed a significant reduction of the auditory modality in the norms provided by deaf individuals compared to the hearing population. However, we did not observe an overall decrease in reported perceptual strength. Interestingly, we found a heightened involvement of other sensory modalities accompanied by reduced modality exclusivity in the conceptualization of words, indicating that deaf individuals heavily rely on information coming from the other perceptual modalities to form concepts. These findings suggest that hearing loss leads to a reorganisation of word conceptualization, characterised by increased multisensoriality. Importantly, although diminished, the auditory modality remains present, suggesting that deaf individuals can still infer auditory-associated knowledge about words to some extent.","PeriodicalId":45880,"journal":{"name":"Language and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2024.13","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, our objective was to explore the impact of hearing loss on the conceptual system underlying word meaning. We collected perceptual strength norms for 200 Italian words from early deaf individuals with limited or no access to auditory information and compared them to existing norms from hearing individuals. For each word, participants provided perceptual strength ratings for each perceptual modality. Our results revealed a significant reduction of the auditory modality in the norms provided by deaf individuals compared to the hearing population. However, we did not observe an overall decrease in reported perceptual strength. Interestingly, we found a heightened involvement of other sensory modalities accompanied by reduced modality exclusivity in the conceptualization of words, indicating that deaf individuals heavily rely on information coming from the other perceptual modalities to form concepts. These findings suggest that hearing loss leads to a reorganisation of word conceptualization, characterised by increased multisensoriality. Importantly, although diminished, the auditory modality remains present, suggesting that deaf individuals can still infer auditory-associated knowledge about words to some extent.
通过聋人的知觉强度规范探索概念表征和基础
在这项研究中,我们的目标是探索听力损失对词义基础概念系统的影响。我们从早期聋人中收集了 200 个意大利语单词的感知强度标准,这些早期聋人只能获得有限的听觉信息或根本无法获得听觉信息,我们将这些标准与现有的听力标准进行了比较。对于每个单词,参与者为每种感知模式提供感知强度评级。我们的结果显示,与听力人群相比,聋人提供的标准中的听觉模式明显减少。然而,我们并没有观察到所报告的感知强度的整体下降。有趣的是,我们发现在词语的概念化过程中,其他感官模式的参与度有所提高,而模式的排他性有所降低,这表明聋人在很大程度上依赖于来自其他感知模式的信息来形成概念。这些研究结果表明,听力损失会导致词汇概念化的重组,其特点是多感官性增强。重要的是,听觉模式虽然减弱,但仍然存在,这表明聋人在一定程度上仍能推断出与听觉相关的词汇知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信