Is open anterior advantageous to posterior decompression and reconstruction in fresh A3 to C3/AO type thoracolumbar junction fractures? A systematic review

IF 2.9 3区医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL

Expert Review of Medical Devices Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2024.2341109

P Korovessis, Vasileios Syrimpeis, Alkis Korovesis

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical outcomes of open anterior and open posterior approaches, for thoracolumbar A3 to C3/AO type fractures, are compared.A PubMed search was conducted from 1990 to 2024 related to anterior, pos...

查看原文本刊更多论文

对于新鲜的A3至C3/AO型胸腰椎交界处骨折，开放式前路减压和重建是否优于后路减压和重建？系统回顾

对胸腰椎 A3 至 C3/AO 型骨折的开放式前路和开放式后路手术效果进行了比较。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Expert Review of Medical Devices 医学-工程：生物医学

CiteScore

5.90

自引率

3.20%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The journal serves the device research community by providing a comprehensive body of high-quality information from leading experts, all subject to rigorous peer review. The Expert Review format is specially structured to optimize the value of the information to reader. Comprehensive coverage by each author in a key area of research or clinical practice is augmented by the following sections: Expert commentary - a personal view on the most effective or promising strategies Five-year view - a clear perspective of future prospects within a realistic timescale Key issues - an executive summary cutting to the author''s most critical points In addition to the Review program, each issue also features Medical Device Profiles - objective assessments of specific devices in development or clinical use to help inform clinical practice. There are also Perspectives - overviews highlighting areas of current debate and controversy, together with reports from the conference scene and invited Editorials.