Comparisons of songbirds on sale across online and physical markets in Indonesia

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Emily I. Grimwood, Jochen K. Menner, Stuart J. Marsden
{"title":"Comparisons of songbirds on sale across online and physical markets in Indonesia","authors":"Emily I. Grimwood, Jochen K. Menner, Stuart J. Marsden","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02825-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Unsustainable wildlife trade is a leading threat to biodiversity, not least in Southeast Asia where serious overexploitation of songbirds has precipitated the ‘Asian Songbird Crisis’. While the nature of bird trade in physical markets is fairly well studied, the growing online trade in birds is far less understood, in terms of diversity and traits of birds on offer. Here, online trade, monitored across twelve broad spectrum Indonesian bird-selling Facebook groups over a period of six months in 2022, is compared to published data from physical markets, and from a machine learning web-scrape. Nearly 2,000 individuals of 190 Indonesian species were recorded from Facebook, with 9.5% of species being categorised as Threatened (IUCN 2022), 15.8% protected under Indonesian law, and 17.4% regarded as priority taxa according to the Asian Songbird Trade Specialist Group. These represent similar proportions of species to those from physical market surveys, although physical markets had more individuals of protected species than did Facebook groups. Bird family composition did not correlate between online and physical platforms, with the former dominated by Muscicapidae and the latter by Estrildidae. Controlling for trade volume, online groups had higher species richness than physical markets, although the difference was not significant. Bird ‘communities’ on offer in the individual Facebook groups were both similar to each other, and distinct from those in physical markets, although there was a geographical signature especially in the latter. Results highlight the importance of monitoring online trade as, while there are substantial differences in types of birds sold, it contains a similarly high number of species of conservation concern to physical markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":8843,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02825-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unsustainable wildlife trade is a leading threat to biodiversity, not least in Southeast Asia where serious overexploitation of songbirds has precipitated the ‘Asian Songbird Crisis’. While the nature of bird trade in physical markets is fairly well studied, the growing online trade in birds is far less understood, in terms of diversity and traits of birds on offer. Here, online trade, monitored across twelve broad spectrum Indonesian bird-selling Facebook groups over a period of six months in 2022, is compared to published data from physical markets, and from a machine learning web-scrape. Nearly 2,000 individuals of 190 Indonesian species were recorded from Facebook, with 9.5% of species being categorised as Threatened (IUCN 2022), 15.8% protected under Indonesian law, and 17.4% regarded as priority taxa according to the Asian Songbird Trade Specialist Group. These represent similar proportions of species to those from physical market surveys, although physical markets had more individuals of protected species than did Facebook groups. Bird family composition did not correlate between online and physical platforms, with the former dominated by Muscicapidae and the latter by Estrildidae. Controlling for trade volume, online groups had higher species richness than physical markets, although the difference was not significant. Bird ‘communities’ on offer in the individual Facebook groups were both similar to each other, and distinct from those in physical markets, although there was a geographical signature especially in the latter. Results highlight the importance of monitoring online trade as, while there are substantial differences in types of birds sold, it contains a similarly high number of species of conservation concern to physical markets.

Abstract Image

印度尼西亚网上和实体市场销售的鸣禽比较
不可持续的野生动植物贸易是生物多样性面临的主要威胁,尤其是在东南亚,对鸣禽的严重过度开发引发了 "亚洲鸣禽危机"。虽然对实体市场上鸟类贸易的性质已有相当深入的研究,但对日益增长的网上鸟类贸易的多样性和鸟类特征的了解却少得多。在此,我们将 2022 年 6 个月期间在 12 个广泛的印尼鸟类销售 Facebook 群组中监测到的在线交易与来自实体市场的公开数据以及来自机器学习网络抓取的数据进行了比较。Facebook 上记录了 190 个印尼物种的近 2000 个个体,其中 9.5% 的物种被归类为濒危物种(世界自然保护联盟,2022 年),15.8% 受印尼法律保护,17.4% 被亚洲鸣禽贸易专家小组视为优先类群。这些物种的比例与实体市场调查中的物种比例相似,但实体市场中受保护物种的个体数量多于 Facebook 群组。在线平台和实体平台的鸟类科属构成并不相关,前者以鹟科为主,后者以尾鸲科为主。在控制交易量的情况下,网络群组的物种丰富度高于实体市场,但差异并不显著。各个 Facebook 群组中提供的鸟类 "群落 "既相互类似,又与实体市场中的鸟类 "群落 "不同,但后者的地理特征尤为明显。研究结果凸显了监测网上交易的重要性,因为尽管所售鸟类的种类存在很大差异,但网上交易与实体市场相比同样包含大量受保护的物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biodiversity and Conservation
Biodiversity and Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Biodiversity and Conservation is an international journal that publishes articles on all aspects of biological diversity-its description, analysis and conservation, and its controlled rational use by humankind. The scope of Biodiversity and Conservation is wide and multidisciplinary, and embraces all life-forms. The journal presents research papers, as well as editorials, comments and research notes on biodiversity and conservation, and contributions dealing with the practicalities of conservation management, economic, social and political issues. The journal provides a forum for examining conflicts between sustainable development and human dependence on biodiversity in agriculture, environmental management and biotechnology, and encourages contributions from developing countries to promote broad global perspectives on matters of biodiversity and conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信