Evolving Licensure Examination: Assessing Student Confidence and Accuracy With Next Generation NCLEX

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Ashley Helvig Coombe, PhD, RN, CNE, LisaMarie Wands, PhD, RN, CHSE-A, CNE, Shannon Stevenson, EdD, MSN, RNC-OB, RNC-MNN, CNE, Rowena W. Elliott, PhD, RN, CNN, AGNP-C, GS-C, CNE, LNC, ANEF, FAAN
{"title":"Evolving Licensure Examination: Assessing Student Confidence and Accuracy With Next Generation NCLEX","authors":"Ashley Helvig Coombe, PhD, RN, CNE, LisaMarie Wands, PhD, RN, CHSE-A, CNE, Shannon Stevenson, EdD, MSN, RNC-OB, RNC-MNN, CNE, Rowena W. Elliott, PhD, RN, CNN, AGNP-C, GS-C, CNE, LNC, ANEF, FAAN","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240207-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<section><h3>Background:</h3><p>The Next Generation NCLEX (NGN) includes new item types. Little is known about nursing students' confidence and accuracy in answering these questions.</p></section><section><h3>Method:</h3><p>A descriptive comparative study examined prelicensure nursing students' confidence and accuracy in answering NGN-style items versus multiple-choice questions (MCQs) of the same content via a 12-item quiz.</p></section><section><h3>Results:</h3><p>Less than one third of students (<i>n</i> = 194; 32.1%) reported feeling confident in answering NGN questions. Students' confidence levels had no relationship on scores with NGN items. When comparing NGN-style items to MCQs, students' (<i>n</i> = 221) scores on NGN-style items were lower with bowtie or a select-all-that-apply questions but higher with highlight table or matrix multiple-choice questions.</p></section><section><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>Students' lack of confidence with certain item types suggests faculty should incorporate these item types into classroom activities or course assignments. NGN test-taking strategies also should be incorporated and frequently reinforced throughout the curriculum. <strong>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(4):252–255.]</strong></p></section>","PeriodicalId":54781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Education","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240207-10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:

The Next Generation NCLEX (NGN) includes new item types. Little is known about nursing students' confidence and accuracy in answering these questions.

Method:

A descriptive comparative study examined prelicensure nursing students' confidence and accuracy in answering NGN-style items versus multiple-choice questions (MCQs) of the same content via a 12-item quiz.

Results:

Less than one third of students (n = 194; 32.1%) reported feeling confident in answering NGN questions. Students' confidence levels had no relationship on scores with NGN items. When comparing NGN-style items to MCQs, students' (n = 221) scores on NGN-style items were lower with bowtie or a select-all-that-apply questions but higher with highlight table or matrix multiple-choice questions.

Conclusion:

Students' lack of confidence with certain item types suggests faculty should incorporate these item types into classroom activities or course assignments. NGN test-taking strategies also should be incorporated and frequently reinforced throughout the curriculum. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(4):252–255.]

不断发展的执照考试:评估学生对下一代 NCLEX 的信心和准确性
背景:下一代NCLEX(NGN)包括新的题目类型。方法:一项描述性比较研究通过 12 个项目的测验,考察了执照前护理专业学生在回答 NGN 类型项目与相同内容的多项选择题(MCQ)时的信心和准确性。学生的自信水平与 NGN 题目的得分没有关系。当将 NGN 类型的题目与 MCQs 进行比较时,学生(n = 221)在 NGN 类型题目上的得分在蝴蝶结或 "全选 "问题上较低,但在高亮表格或矩阵选择题上较高。此外,还应在整个课程中纳入并经常强化 NGN 考试策略。[J Nurs Educ.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Education is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles and new ideas for nurse educators in various types and levels of nursing programs for over 50 years. The Journal enhances the teaching-learning process, promotes curriculum development, and stimulates creative innovation and research in nursing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信