Rethinking 13C-metabolic flux analysis – The Bayesian way of flux inference

Abstract

Metabolic reaction rates (fluxes) play a crucial role in comprehending cellular phenotypes and are essential in areas such as metabolic engineering, biotechnology, and biomedical research. The state-of-the-art technique for estimating fluxes is metabolic flux analysis using isotopic labelling (¹³C-MFA), which uses a dataset-model combination to determine the fluxes. Bayesian statistical methods are gaining popularity in the field of life sciences, but the use of ¹³C-MFA is still dominated by conventional best-fit approaches. The slow take-up of Bayesian approaches is, at least partly, due to the unfamiliarity of Bayesian methods to metabolic engineering researchers. To address this unfamiliarity, we here outline similarities and differences between the two approaches and highlight particular advantages of the Bayesian way of flux analysis. With a real-life example, re-analysing a moderately informative labelling dataset of E. coli, we identify situations in which Bayesian methods are advantageous and more informative, pointing to potential pitfalls of current ¹³C-MFA evaluation approaches. We propose the use of Bayesian model averaging (BMA) for flux inference as a means of overcoming the problem of model uncertainty through its tendency to assign low probabilities to both, models that are unsupported by data, and models that are overly complex. In this capacity, BMA resembles a tempered Ockham's razor. With the tempered razor as a guide, BMA-based ¹³C-MFA alleviates the problem of model selection uncertainty and is thereby capable of becoming a game changer for metabolic engineering by uncovering new insights and inspiring novel approaches.