Assessing the attractiveness of chemical and process facilities to terrorism using a situational crime prevention approach

IF 3.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Giulia Marroni , Valeria Casson Moreno , Alessia Tortolini , Francesco Tamburini , Gabriele Landucci
{"title":"Assessing the attractiveness of chemical and process facilities to terrorism using a situational crime prevention approach","authors":"Giulia Marroni ,&nbsp;Valeria Casson Moreno ,&nbsp;Alessia Tortolini ,&nbsp;Francesco Tamburini ,&nbsp;Gabriele Landucci","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As intentional attacks to industry have been on the rise in the last years, researchers and institutions put effort in addressing risks of industrial assets exposed to acts of interference. One of the key steps of security risk assessment is the evaluation of the attractiveness, i.e. determining which installation or part of it could be of interest to a potential attacker. As security concerns are intrinsically tied to human intention, attractiveness does not only depend on technical characteristics of the facility, but also on the type of threat and its geographic, economic, and socio-political context. Therefore, interdisciplinarity is among the key features of a team tasked with assessing attractiveness. This work is the result of the joint effort of Physical Sciences and Engineering experts and Social Sciences and Humanities experts, and it presents a methodology for the assessment of attractiveness of process facilities to physical terroristic attacks developed using a “terrorist thinking” approach. Technical factors such as plant layout and physical protection systems were combined with modern criminology principles (namely Situational Crime Prevention, i.e. how actors take advantage of situated opportunities to commit a crime) to obtain a comprehensive picture of the possible motives behind a physical terroristic attack to a chemical and process facility (meant as facilities where chemical substances are present and where chemical and/or physical processes occurs). The methodology was applied to a case study featuring facilities located in a critical context; a ranking among facilities was obtained, and the robustness of the results was tested through a Monte Carlo-based uncertainty analysis. The results revealed that it is not possible to obtain a clear ranking of critical facilities accounting only for technical or non-technical factors, but both are necessary. The method developed was demonstrated easy to apply and could be used not only by plant security managers, but also by Institutions and Governments to prioritize critical assets in threatening contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423024000792","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As intentional attacks to industry have been on the rise in the last years, researchers and institutions put effort in addressing risks of industrial assets exposed to acts of interference. One of the key steps of security risk assessment is the evaluation of the attractiveness, i.e. determining which installation or part of it could be of interest to a potential attacker. As security concerns are intrinsically tied to human intention, attractiveness does not only depend on technical characteristics of the facility, but also on the type of threat and its geographic, economic, and socio-political context. Therefore, interdisciplinarity is among the key features of a team tasked with assessing attractiveness. This work is the result of the joint effort of Physical Sciences and Engineering experts and Social Sciences and Humanities experts, and it presents a methodology for the assessment of attractiveness of process facilities to physical terroristic attacks developed using a “terrorist thinking” approach. Technical factors such as plant layout and physical protection systems were combined with modern criminology principles (namely Situational Crime Prevention, i.e. how actors take advantage of situated opportunities to commit a crime) to obtain a comprehensive picture of the possible motives behind a physical terroristic attack to a chemical and process facility (meant as facilities where chemical substances are present and where chemical and/or physical processes occurs). The methodology was applied to a case study featuring facilities located in a critical context; a ranking among facilities was obtained, and the robustness of the results was tested through a Monte Carlo-based uncertainty analysis. The results revealed that it is not possible to obtain a clear ranking of critical facilities accounting only for technical or non-technical factors, but both are necessary. The method developed was demonstrated easy to apply and could be used not only by plant security managers, but also by Institutions and Governments to prioritize critical assets in threatening contexts.

采用情景犯罪预防方法评估化学和加工设施对恐怖主义的吸引力
近年来,针对工业的蓄意攻击不断增加,因此研究人员和机构都在努力应对工业资产受到干扰的风险。安全风险评估的关键步骤之一是评估吸引力,即确定潜在攻击者可能对哪些设备或其中的一部分感兴趣。由于安全问题与人的意图有着内在联系,因此吸引力不仅取决于设施的技术特征,还取决于威胁的类型及其地理、经济和社会政治背景。因此,跨学科性是负责评估吸引力的团队的主要特征之一。这项工作是物理科学和工程学专家与社会科学和人文科学专家共同努力的成果,它介绍了一种采用 "恐怖主义思维 "方法来评估加工设施对物理恐怖袭击的吸引力的方法。该方法将工厂布局和实体保护系统等技术因素与现代犯罪学原理(即情境犯罪预防,即行为人如何利用所处环境的机会实施犯罪)相结合,以全面了解对化学和加工设施(指存在化学物质以及进行化学和/或物理加工的设施)实施实体恐怖袭击的可能动机。该方法被应用于一项案例研究,其特点是位于关键环境中的设施;获得了设施之间的排名,并通过基于蒙特卡洛的不确定性分析对结果的稳健性进行了测试。结果表明,仅考虑技术因素或非技术因素不可能获得关键设施的明确排名,两者缺一不可。事实证明,所开发的方法易于应用,不仅工厂安全管理人员可以使用,机构和政府也可以使用,以便在受到威胁的情况下对关键资产进行优先排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信