Changes in vaccination practices among infants after the introduction of DTaP-IPV/Hib combination vaccines

IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Hee-Jin Kim , Suvin Park , Na-Young Jeong , Nam-Kyong Choi
{"title":"Changes in vaccination practices among infants after the introduction of DTaP-IPV/Hib combination vaccines","authors":"Hee-Jin Kim ,&nbsp;Suvin Park ,&nbsp;Na-Young Jeong ,&nbsp;Nam-Kyong Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis, polio, and Haemophilus influenza type B (DTaP-IPV/Hib) combination vaccine was introduced as a part of the Korea National Immunization Program (NIP) on June 19, 2017. Combination vaccines can improve vaccination rates by simplifying the vaccination schedule.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explain how the introduction of DTaP-IPV/Hib in the NIP has changed vaccination practices for infants.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a nationwide vaccine registry, the proportion of infants who completed the full recommended doses of the primary series of DTaP, IPV, and Hib (D-I-H) within 12 months of age was estimated among those born between 2013 and 2019. Among those, the proportions of those who received the same DTaP components for all 3 doses during the primary series were calculated for the 2013–2016 and the 2017–2019 birth cohorts. Those who received the same component of DTaP throughout the entire primary vaccination schedule were categorized into 3 groups by DTaP components to compare the average frequency of medical visits for vaccination.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 2,703,822 infants were born between 2013 and 2019, of which 96.7% completed full doses of the primary D-I-H series within 12 months of age. For the 2013–2016 birth cohorts, most received DTaP-IPV-only (75.4%), while most of the 2017–2019 birth cohorts received DTaP-IPV/Hib-only (81.0%) to complete the 3 doses for primary D-I-H series. The average frequency of medical visits for vaccination showed a significant difference across the 3 groups classified by DTaP components in every birth cohort (p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>After the introduction of DTaP-IPV/Hib, most infants completed the primary D-I-H series with the combination vaccine and there was a significant reduction in the average number of medical visits for vaccination. Our findings provide important insights for countries considering the introduction of combination vaccines into their NIP.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100484"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136224000573/pdfft?md5=d25c9ab2da475f1b17a466455153494f&pid=1-s2.0-S2590136224000573-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136224000573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis, polio, and Haemophilus influenza type B (DTaP-IPV/Hib) combination vaccine was introduced as a part of the Korea National Immunization Program (NIP) on June 19, 2017. Combination vaccines can improve vaccination rates by simplifying the vaccination schedule.

Objective

To explain how the introduction of DTaP-IPV/Hib in the NIP has changed vaccination practices for infants.

Methods

Using a nationwide vaccine registry, the proportion of infants who completed the full recommended doses of the primary series of DTaP, IPV, and Hib (D-I-H) within 12 months of age was estimated among those born between 2013 and 2019. Among those, the proportions of those who received the same DTaP components for all 3 doses during the primary series were calculated for the 2013–2016 and the 2017–2019 birth cohorts. Those who received the same component of DTaP throughout the entire primary vaccination schedule were categorized into 3 groups by DTaP components to compare the average frequency of medical visits for vaccination.

Results

A total of 2,703,822 infants were born between 2013 and 2019, of which 96.7% completed full doses of the primary D-I-H series within 12 months of age. For the 2013–2016 birth cohorts, most received DTaP-IPV-only (75.4%), while most of the 2017–2019 birth cohorts received DTaP-IPV/Hib-only (81.0%) to complete the 3 doses for primary D-I-H series. The average frequency of medical visits for vaccination showed a significant difference across the 3 groups classified by DTaP components in every birth cohort (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

After the introduction of DTaP-IPV/Hib, most infants completed the primary D-I-H series with the combination vaccine and there was a significant reduction in the average number of medical visits for vaccination. Our findings provide important insights for countries considering the introduction of combination vaccines into their NIP.

引入 DTaP-IPV/Hib 混合疫苗后婴儿接种疫苗方式的变化
背景2017年6月19日,白喉-破伤风-百日咳、脊髓灰质炎和乙型流感嗜血杆菌(DTaP-IPV/Hib)联合疫苗作为韩国国家免疫计划(NIP)的一部分被引入。联合疫苗可以通过简化接种计划来提高接种率。方法利用全国范围内的疫苗登记系统,对 2013 年至 2019 年间出生的婴儿中在 12 月龄内完成全部 DTaP、IPV 和 Hib(D-I-H)初级系列推荐剂量的婴儿比例进行了估算。其中,计算了 2013-2016 年出生组群和 2017-2019 年出生组群在初级系列中接受了 3 次相同剂量 DTaP 的比例。按照 DTaP 成分将在整个初级疫苗接种计划中接种了相同 DTaP 成分的婴儿分为 3 组,以比较接种疫苗的平均就诊频率。结果 2013 年至 2019 年间共出生了 2 703 822 名婴儿,其中 96.7% 的婴儿在 12 个月内完成了初级 D-I-H 系列的全部剂量。在 2013-2016 年出生的新生儿群中,大多数只接种了 DTaP-IPV (75.4%),而在 2017-2019 年出生的新生儿群中,大多数只接种了 DTaP-IPV/Hib (81.0%),以完成初级 D-I-H 系列的 3 剂接种。结论在引入 DTaP-IPV/Hib 后,大多数婴儿接种了联合疫苗,完成了初级 D-I-H 系列接种,接种疫苗的平均就诊次数显著减少。我们的研究结果为考虑在国家免疫计划中引入联合疫苗的国家提供了重要启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine: X
Vaccine: X Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
102
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信