Global Sagittal Angle and T9-tilt seem to be the most clinically and functionally relevant global alignment parameters in patients with Adult Spinal Deformity

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nabil Nassim , Elio Mekhael , Rami El Rachkidi , Maria Saadé , Elma Ayoub , Ali Rteil , Elena Jaber , Celine Chaaya , Rami Rehayem , Julien Abi Nahed , Mohamad Karam , Ismat Ghanem , Abir Massaad , Ayman Assi
{"title":"Global Sagittal Angle and T9-tilt seem to be the most clinically and functionally relevant global alignment parameters in patients with Adult Spinal Deformity","authors":"Nabil Nassim ,&nbsp;Elio Mekhael ,&nbsp;Rami El Rachkidi ,&nbsp;Maria Saadé ,&nbsp;Elma Ayoub ,&nbsp;Ali Rteil ,&nbsp;Elena Jaber ,&nbsp;Celine Chaaya ,&nbsp;Rami Rehayem ,&nbsp;Julien Abi Nahed ,&nbsp;Mohamad Karam ,&nbsp;Ismat Ghanem ,&nbsp;Abir Massaad ,&nbsp;Ayman Assi","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Radiographic analysis is necessary for the assessment and the surgical planning in adults with spinal deformity (ASD). Restoration of global alignment is key to improving patient's quality of life. However, the large number of existing global alignment parameters can be confusing for surgeons.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>To determine the most clinically and functionally relevant global alignment parameters in ASD.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>ASD and controls underwent full body biplanar X-ray to calculate global alignment parameters: odontoid to hip axis angle (OD-HA), global sagittal angle (GSA), global tilt (GT), SVA, center of auditory meatus to hip axis (CAM-HA), SSA, T1-tilt and T9-tilt. All subjects filled HRQoL questionnaires: ODI, SF-36, VAS for pain and BDI (Beck's Depression Inventory). 3D gait analysis was performed to calculate kinematic and spatio-temporal parameters. A machine learning model predicted gait parameters and HRQoL scores from global alignment parameters.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>124 primary ASD and 47 controls were enrolled. T9 tilt predicted the most BDI (31%), hip flexion/extension during gait (36%), and double support time (39%). GSA predicted the most ODI (26%), thorax flexion/extension during gait (33%), and cadence (36%).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>Among all global alignment parameters, GSA, evaluating both trunk shift and knee flexion, and T9 tilt, evaluating the shift of the center of mass, were the best predictors for most of HRQoL scores and gait kinematics. Therefore, we recommend using GSA and T9 tilt in clinical practice when evaluating ASD because they represent the most quality of life and functional kinematic of these patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000614/pdfft?md5=365199a7f18aa7ab6592023017b8215c&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424000614-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Radiographic analysis is necessary for the assessment and the surgical planning in adults with spinal deformity (ASD). Restoration of global alignment is key to improving patient's quality of life. However, the large number of existing global alignment parameters can be confusing for surgeons.

Research question

To determine the most clinically and functionally relevant global alignment parameters in ASD.

Material and methods

ASD and controls underwent full body biplanar X-ray to calculate global alignment parameters: odontoid to hip axis angle (OD-HA), global sagittal angle (GSA), global tilt (GT), SVA, center of auditory meatus to hip axis (CAM-HA), SSA, T1-tilt and T9-tilt. All subjects filled HRQoL questionnaires: ODI, SF-36, VAS for pain and BDI (Beck's Depression Inventory). 3D gait analysis was performed to calculate kinematic and spatio-temporal parameters. A machine learning model predicted gait parameters and HRQoL scores from global alignment parameters.

Results

124 primary ASD and 47 controls were enrolled. T9 tilt predicted the most BDI (31%), hip flexion/extension during gait (36%), and double support time (39%). GSA predicted the most ODI (26%), thorax flexion/extension during gait (33%), and cadence (36%).

Discussion and conclusion

Among all global alignment parameters, GSA, evaluating both trunk shift and knee flexion, and T9 tilt, evaluating the shift of the center of mass, were the best predictors for most of HRQoL scores and gait kinematics. Therefore, we recommend using GSA and T9 tilt in clinical practice when evaluating ASD because they represent the most quality of life and functional kinematic of these patients.

整体矢状角和 T9 倾斜似乎是与成人脊柱畸形患者的临床和功能最相关的整体对齐参数
导言:放射学分析是评估和规划成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术的必要条件。恢复整体对齐是提高患者生活质量的关键。材料和方法脊柱畸形患者和对照组接受全身双平面 X 光检查,以计算整体对齐参数:蝶骨与髋轴角 (OD-HA)、整体矢状角 (GSA)、整体倾斜度 (GT)、SVA、听小骨中心与髋轴角 (CAM-HA)、SSA、T1-倾斜度和 T9-倾斜度。所有受试者都填写了 HRQoL 问卷:ODI、SF-36、疼痛 VAS 和 BDI(贝克抑郁量表)。三维步态分析用于计算运动学和时空参数。一个机器学习模型根据全局排列参数预测步态参数和 HRQoL 评分。T9倾斜对BDI(31%)、步态过程中髋关节屈伸(36%)和双支撑时间(39%)的预测最大。讨论与结论在所有全局对齐参数中,评估躯干移位和膝关节屈曲的 GSA 和评估质心移位的 T9 倾斜是大多数 HRQoL 评分和步态运动学的最佳预测指标。因此,我们建议在临床实践中评估 ASD 时使用 GSA 和 T9 倾斜,因为它们最能代表这些患者的生活质量和功能运动学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信